Cover not available
Part of
History of Linguistics 2011: Selected Papers from the 12th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XII), Saint Petersburg, 28 August - 2 September 2011
Edited by Vadim Kasevich, Yuri A. Kleiner and Patrick Sériot
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 123] 2014
► pp. 37–49

The main characteristics of grammar-writing in Slovenia between 1584 and 1758

| Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts | University of Nova Gorica
The paper discusses some of the characteristic approaches to composing grammar books and other grammatical treatises in the area of present-day Slovenia between 1584 and 1758. Its focus is on Adam Bohorič’s method of adapting foreign models (1584), on the parallel presentation of paradigms from different languages in the four-language dictionary by Hieronymus Megiser (1592), and on sundry attempts at explaining the growing discrepancy between the traditional written norm and the spoken language – attempts which occur in the revisions of the Bohorič grammar (1715, 1755, 1758) and in the grammatical introductions to literary works of the 17th and early 18th centuries. It is thus intended to provide some basic guidelines for future research.
Published online: 29 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.123.04aha
References (32)
References
Ahačič, Kozma. 2007. Zgodovina misli o jeziku in književnosti na Slovenskem: protestantizem. (= Linguistica et philologica, 18.) Ljubljana: Založba ZRC, ZRC SAZU.Google Scholar
. 2008. “The treatment of ‘nomen’ in the first Slovenian grammar (Bohorič 1584)”. Historiographia Linguistica 35.2–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Zgodovina misli o jeziku na Slovenskem: katoliška doba (1600–1758). (= Linguistica et philologica, 28.) Ljubljana: Založba ZRC, ZRC SAZU.Google Scholar
. 2013. The History of Linguistic Thought and Language Use in 16th Century Slovenia. (Thought, Society, Culture: Slovenian and South Eastern European Perspectives, 1). Frankfurt am Main [etc.]: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Albertus, Laurentius. 1573. Teutsch Grammatick oder Sprach-Kunst. Augsburg: Michael Manger.Google Scholar
[Anon.]. 1755. Grammatica Latino-Germanico-Slavonica. Manuscript [BSB München, cod. Slav. 8].
. 1758. Grammatica oder Windisches Sprach-Buch. Klagenfurt: Johann Friderich Kleinmayr seel. Erben.Google Scholar
Basar, Jernej. 1734. Conciones juxta Libellum Exercitiorum S. P. Ignatij. Ljubljana: Adam Fride­ricus Reichhardt.Google Scholar
Berčič, Branko, ed. 1971. Adam Bohorič: Arcticae horulae: Die erste Grammatik der slowenischen Sprache. Munich: Rudolf Trofenik.Google Scholar
Bohorič, Adam. 1584. Arcticae horulae succisivae de Latinocarniolana literatura. Wittenberg: np.Google Scholar
Bretschneider, Karl Gottlieb. 1854. Philipi Melanthonis Opera quae supersunt omnia. (= Corpus reformatorum, 20.) Braunschweig: apud C. A. Schwetschke et filium.Google Scholar
Clajus, Johannes. 1578. Grammatica germanicae linguae. Leipzig: Iohannes Rhamba.Google Scholar
Colombat, Bernard & Manfred Peters, eds. 2008. Konrad Gessner: Mithridates. (= Travaux d’Humanisme et Renaissance, 452.) Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Gessner, Konrad. 1555. Mithridates: De differentiis linguarum tum veterum tum quae hodie apud diversas nationes in toto orbe terrarum in usu sunt. Zürich: Froschouerus.Google Scholar
Grdina, Igor. 1999. Od Brižinskih spomenikov do razsvetljenstva. Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Marc. 2000. A historical phonology of the Slovene language. (= Historical phonology of the Slavic languages, 13.) Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Hippolytus of Novo Mesto. 1715. Grammatica Latino-Germanico-Slavonica. Ljubljana: Joannes Georgius Mayr.Google Scholar
Megiser, Hieronymus. 1592. Dictionarium quatuor linguarum. Graz: Iohannes Faber.Google Scholar
. 1603. Thesaurus polyglottus. Frankfurt am Main: sumptibus authoris.Google Scholar
Melanchthon, Philippus. [n. d.]. Grammatica Philippi Melanchthonis, Latina, iam denuo recognita, et plerisque in locis locupletata. Nürnberg: Iohannes Petreius. (= MGL.)
. 1538. Syntaxis olim a Philippo Melanthone collecta, nunc locupletata, ut sit ad usum scholarum accommodatior. Strasbourg: Millius.Google Scholar
. 1571. [Grammaticae Graecae libellus Philippi Melanchtonis cum accessionibus Joachimi Camerarii Papebergensis editus]. Leipzig: Andr. Scheider.Google Scholar
. 1585. Grammatica Philippi Melancthonis recognita et locupletata. Accessit tractatus de Orthographia, recens. Leipzig: Iohannes Steinman.Google Scholar
Ölinger, Albert. 1574. Underricht der Hoch Teutschen Spraach. Strasbourg: Nicolaus Wyriot.Google Scholar
Paglovec, Franc Mihael. 1741. Evangelia, inu branie. Ljubljana: Adam Fridericus Reichhardt.Google Scholar
Pogorelec, Breda. 2011. Zgodovina slovenskega knjižnega jezika: jezikoslovni spisi I. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC, ZRC SAZU, Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete.Google Scholar
Rossebastiano, Alda. 2000. “Anvers: les Colloquia de Noël de Berlaimont”. History of the Language Sciences […], eds. by Sylvain Auroux, E.F.K. Koerner, et al., vol. 1, 693–698. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schönleben, Janez Ludvik. 1672. Evangelia inu listuvi. Graz: Skuſi Widmanstetterske erbe.Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, Edward, 1984. Grammars and Dictionaries of the Slavic Languages from the Middle Ages up to 1850: An Annotated Bibliography. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
Statorius, Petrus. 1568. Polonicae grammatices institutio. Kraków: Mathias Wirzbieta, Typographus Regius.Google Scholar
Svetokriški, Janez. 1691–1707. Sacrum promptuarium. 5 vols. Venice: Zacharia Conzatti and Ljubljana: typographeus Mayrianus.Google Scholar
Toporišič, Jože. 1984. “Oblikoslovje v Bohoričevih Zimskih uricah”. 20. Seminar slovenskega jezika, literature in kulture, 189–222.Google Scholar