Article published in:
History of Linguistics 2011: Selected Papers from the 12th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XII), Saint Petersburg, 28 August - 2 September 2011
Edited by Vadim Kasevich, Yuri A. Kleiner and Patrick Sériot
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 123] 2014
► pp. 117–125

Questioning the idea of ‘founding text’

Harris’s Discourse Analysis and French Analyse du discours

| CNRS, University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité
The notion of ‘founding text’ is an uneasy one for the history of sciences where it always refers to an après-coup construction. This paper aims to disentangle the threads of this aftermath effect in the case of Harris’s text, Discourse Analysis, published in 1952, which became a founding text for French Discourse Analysis in the late 1960s. Two trends will be examined, Jean Dubois’ and Michel Pêcheux’s, who constructed two different versions of the notion of founding text. Furthermore, this research should contribute to the study of Harris’s reception in France, and to the specificity of his reception.
Published online: 29 August 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.123.10leo
References

References

Primary literature

Dubois, Jean
1962 Le vocabulaire politique et social en France de 1869 à 1872. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
1969 “Lexicologie et analyse d’énoncé”. Cahiers de Lexicologie 15.115–126.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Catherine
1982 La Paraphrase. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1946 “From Morpheme to Utterance”. Language 22.161–183. (Translated by Maurice Gross as “Du morphème à l’expression”. Langages 9. 1968. 23–50). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1951 Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1952 “Discourse Analysis”. Language 28: 1–30. (Translated into French by Françoise Dubois-Charlier. Langages 13. 1969.8–45). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1957 “Co-Occurrence and Transformation in Linguistic Structure”. Language 33.283–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1959 “Linguistic Transformations for Information Retrieval”. (= Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 1958: 2.) Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council.Google Scholar
1963 Discourse Analysis. Reprints. La Haye: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
1969 “The two systems of grammar: report and paraphrase”. Transformations and Discourse Analysis Papers, 79, University of Pennsylvania. (Translated into French as “Les deux systèmes de la grammaire: prédicat et paraphrase”. Langages 29. 1973.55–81).Google Scholar
Leeman, Danielle
1973 “Les paraphrases”. Langages 29.43–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marandin, Jean-Marie
1979 “Problèmes d’analyse du discours. Essai de description du discours français sur la Chine”. Langages 55.17–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pêcheux, Michel
1969 Analyse Automatique du Discours. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Pêcheux, Michel, ed
1975 Mises au point et perspectives à propos de l’analyse automatique du discours. Langages 37.Google Scholar
Pêcheux, Michel, Simone Bonnafous, Jacqueline Léon, Jean-Marie Marandin
1982 “Présentation de l’analyse automatique du discours (AAD69): théorie, procédures, résultats, perspectives”. Mots 4.95–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Togeby, Knud
1951 Structure immanente de la langue française. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Copenhague.Google Scholar

Secondary literature

Chevalier, Jean-Claude
2006 Combats pour la linguistique, de Martinet à Kristeva. Lyon: ENS Editions.Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
2002 “Zellig Sabbettai Harris. A comprehensive bibliography of his writings 1932–2002”. The Legacy of Zellig Harris, ed. by Bruce E. Nevin, vol. II, 293–304. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Léon, Jacqueline
2010a “AAD69. Archéologie d’une étrange machine”. Semen, 79–98.Google Scholar
2010b “Automatisation-mathématisation de la linguistique en France dans les années 1960. Un cas de réception externe”. Actes du 2e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, La Nouvelle-Orléans, 12–15 July 2010 , ed. by Frank Neveu, Valelia Muni-Toke, Jacques Durand, Thomas Kingler, Lorenza Mondada, Sophie Prévost, 825–838. Paris: Institut de la Langue Française.Google Scholar
Maldidier, Denise
ed. 1990 L’inquiétude du discours. Textes de Michel Pêcheux, Paris: Editions des Cendres.Google Scholar
Puech, Christian
2008 “Qu’est-ce que faire l’histoire du ‘récent’?” Actes du 1er Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, Paris, 9–12 July 2008, ed. by Jacques Durand, Benoît Habert, Bernard Laks, 1093–1102. Paris: Institut de la Langue Française.Google Scholar