Cover not available
Part of
History of Linguistics 2011: Selected Papers from the 12th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XII), Saint Petersburg, 28 August - 2 September 2011
Edited by Vadim Kasevich, Yuri A. Kleiner and Patrick Sériot
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 123] 2014
► pp. 117–125

Questioning the idea of ‘founding text’

Harris’s Discourse Analysis and French Analyse du discours

| CNRS, University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité
The notion of ‘founding text’ is an uneasy one for the history of sciences where it always refers to an après-coup construction. This paper aims to disentangle the threads of this aftermath effect in the case of Harris’s text, Discourse Analysis, published in 1952, which became a founding text for French Discourse Analysis in the late 1960s. Two trends will be examined, Jean Dubois’ and Michel Pêcheux’s, who constructed two different versions of the notion of founding text. Furthermore, this research should contribute to the study of Harris’s reception in France, and to the specificity of his reception.
Published online: 29 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.123.10leo
References (22)
References
Primary literature
Dubois, Jean. 1962. Le vocabulaire politique et social en France de 1869 à 1872. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
. 1969. “Lexicologie et analyse d’énoncé”. Cahiers de Lexicologie 15.115–126.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Catherine. 1982. La Paraphrase. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. 1946. “From Morpheme to Utterance”. Language 22.161–183. (Translated by Maurice Gross as “Du morphème à l’expression”. Langages 9. 1968. 23–50). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1951. Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1952. “Discourse Analysis”. Language 28: 1–30. (Translated into French by Françoise Dubois-Charlier. Langages 13. 1969.8–45). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1957. “Co-Occurrence and Transformation in Linguistic Structure”. Language 33.283–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1959. “Linguistic Transformations for Information Retrieval”. (= Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 1958: 2.) Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council.Google Scholar
. 1963. Discourse Analysis. Reprints. La Haye: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
. 1969. “The two systems of grammar: report and paraphrase”. Transformations and Discourse Analysis Papers, 79, University of Pennsylvania. (Translated into French as “Les deux systèmes de la grammaire: prédicat et paraphrase”. Langages 29. 1973.55–81).Google Scholar
Leeman, Danielle. 1973. “Les paraphrases”. Langages 29.43–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marandin, Jean-Marie. 1979. “Problèmes d’analyse du discours. Essai de description du discours français sur la Chine”. Langages 55.17–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pêcheux, Michel. 1969. Analyse Automatique du Discours. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Pêcheux, Michel, ed. 1975. Mises au point et perspectives à propos de l’analyse automatique du discours. Langages 37.Google Scholar
Pêcheux, Michel, Simone Bonnafous, Jacqueline Léon, Jean-Marie Marandin. 1982. “Présentation de l’analyse automatique du discours (AAD69): théorie, procédures, résultats, perspectives”. Mots 4.95–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Togeby, Knud. 1951. Structure immanente de la langue française. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Copenhague.Google Scholar
Secondary literature
Chevalier, Jean-Claude. 2006. Combats pour la linguistique, de Martinet à Kristeva. Lyon: ENS Editions.Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad. 2002. “Zellig Sabbettai Harris. A comprehensive bibliography of his writings 1932–2002”. The Legacy of Zellig Harris, ed. by Bruce E. Nevin, vol. II, 293–304. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Léon, Jacqueline. 2010a. “AAD69. Archéologie d’une étrange machine”. Semen, 79–98.Google Scholar
. 2010b. “Automatisation-mathématisation de la linguistique en France dans les années 1960. Un cas de réception externe”. Actes du 2e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, La Nouvelle-Orléans, 12–15 July 2010 , ed. by Frank Neveu, Valelia Muni-Toke, Jacques Durand, Thomas Kingler, Lorenza Mondada, Sophie Prévost, 825–838. Paris: Institut de la Langue Française.Google Scholar
Maldidier, Denise, ed. 1990. L’inquiétude du discours. Textes de Michel Pêcheux, Paris: Editions des Cendres.Google Scholar
Puech, Christian. 2008. “Qu’est-ce que faire l’histoire du ‘récent’?” Actes du 1er Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, Paris, 9–12 July 2008, ed. by Jacques Durand, Benoît Habert, Bernard Laks, 1093–1102. Paris: Institut de la Langue Française.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Léon, Jacqueline
2019. Note sur la notion de corpus en analyse de discours : de Harris à l’analyse de discours française. In Grammaticalia, ► pp. 283 ff. DOI logo
Léon, Jacqueline
2020. Jean Dubois, un passeur ?. Linx :80 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.