Cover not available
Part of
History of Linguistics 2011: Selected Papers from the 12th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XII), Saint Petersburg, 28 August - 2 September 2011
Edited by Vadim Kasevich, Yuri A. Kleiner and Patrick Sériot
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 123] 2014
► pp. 159–167

Soviet linguistics and world linguistics

 | Russian Academy of Sciences
Soviet linguistics was always part of world science, influenced by global processes. The transition to structuralism took place in the Soviet Union as well. The two main schools of those years, the Leningrad and Moscow schools, belonged to the structural paradigm, although the term ‘structuralism’ was not adopted at that time. The gap between Soviet and world linguistics was not as great as it is now considered to be, because Soviet scholars were informed about the developments in Western linguistics. It was much harder to gain recognition in the West. The ideas of Western structural linguistics began to penetrate into Soviet scholarship in the second half of the 1950s. Soviet structuralism, however, developed into a separate trend, which did not constitute a unity. The influence of generative linguistics in its canonical form prior to the 1990s was not significant.
Published online: 29 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.123.14alp
References (20)
References
Abaev, Vasilij. 2006. Stat’ji po teorii i istorii jazykoznanija [Articles on Theory and History of Linguistics] . Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Alpatov, Vladimir. 2001. “Čto takoje Moskovskaja lingvističeskaja škola? [What is the Moscow linguistic school]”. Moskovskij Lingvističeskij Žurnal [Moscow Linguistic Journal] 5:2.11–34.Google Scholar
Avanesov, Ruben. 2004. Vladimir Nikolaevič Sidorov Otcy I deti Moscovskoj lingvističeskoj školy. Pamjati Vladimira Nikolaeviča Sidorova [Fathers and Children of the Moscow Linguistic School . In memory of Vladimir Nikolaevič Sidorov], ed. by Svetlana Borunova & Vera 
Plotnikova-Robinson, 13–19. Moscow: Institut Russkogo Jazyka.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1962. “Sintaksičeskie Struktury [Syntactic Structures]”. Novoe v lingvistike [New Ideas in Linguistics], ed. by Vladimir Zvegincev, 2, 412–527. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Inostrannoy Literatury.Google Scholar
Editorial. 1952. “Zadači sovetskogo jazykoznanija v svete trudov I. V. Stalina i žurnal ‘Voprosy jazykoznanija’” [Tasks of the Soviet Linguistics in the Light of the Works of I. V. Stalin and the Journal “Voprosy Jazykoznanija”]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1:1.3–40.Google Scholar
Gleason, Henry. 1959. Vvedenije v deskriptivnuju lingvistiku [Introduction in the Descriptive Linguistics] . Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Inostrannoj Literatury.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1960. “Prolegomeny k teorii jazyka [Prolegomena to the Theory of Language]”. Novoe v lingvistike [New Ideas in Linguistics], ed. by Vladimir Zvegincev, 1, 264–389. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Inostrannoj Literatury.Google Scholar
Ilizarov, Boris. 2003.“Počyotnyi akademik Stalin protiv akademika Marra. K istorii diskussii po voprosam jazykoznanija v 1950 g. [Honorary academician Stalin against academician Marr. On the history of the discussion of the linguistic problems in 1950]” Novaja i novejšaja istorija 5.162–187.Google Scholar
Izvestija AN SSSR, serija literatury i jazyka [ Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Series of Literature and Language ] 1946. V:6. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR.
Kuznecov, Pjotr. 2003. “Vospominanija [Memoirs]” Moskovskij Lingvističeskij Žurnal [Moscow Linguistic Journal] 7:1.155–250.Google Scholar
Polivanov, Evgenij. 1968. Stat’i po obščemu jazykoznaniju [Articles on General Linguistics]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Reformackij, Aleksandr. 1970. Iz istorii otečestvennoj fonologii [From the History of the Russian Phonology]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Robinson, Mixail. 2004. Sud’by akademičeskoj elity: Otečestvennoje slavjanovedenie (1917–načalo 1930-x godov) [Destinies of the Academic Elite: Russian Slavic Studies (1917–beginning of 1930s)] . Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1934. Jazyk [Language] . Moscow: Socekgiz.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1933. Kurs obščey lingvistiki [Course in General Linguistics] . Moscow: Socekgiz.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergej. 1999. “O dokazatel’stve jazykovogo rodstva [On the proof of the kinship of languages]”. Tipologija i teorija jazyka. Ot opisanija k objasneniju. K 60-letiju Alexandra Evgenjeviča Kibrika [Typology and Theory of Language. From Description to Explanation. In Honour of the 60th Birthday of A. E. Kibrik]. Moscow: Jazyki Russkoj Kul’tury. 57–69.Google Scholar
Trubačov, Oleg. 1997. “Moi vospominanija o Nikite Iljiče Tolstom [My memoirs about Nikita Tolstoy]”. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 46:2.3–8.Google Scholar
Trubeckoj, Nikolaj. 1960. Osnovy fonologii [Foundations of Phonology] . Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Inostrannoj Literatury.Google Scholar
Vološinov, Valentin. 1929. Marksizm I filosofija jazyka [ Marxism and Philosophy of Language ]. Leningrad: Priboj. [Translated by Ladislav Matejka and I.R. Titunik, as Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Harvard University Press, 1973.]Google Scholar
Zvegincev, Vladimir. 1996. Mysli o lingvistike [Thoughts about Linguistics] . Moscow: Moskovskij Universitet.Google Scholar