Cover not available
Part of
History of Linguistics 2014: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25–29 August 2014
Edited by Carlos Assunção, Gonçalo Fernandes and Rolf Kemmler
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 126] 2016
► pp. 69–82

On the typology of ancient grammars

The regulae grammars

In my study I explore three approaches to noun declensions in ancient grammar. The most popular ancient grammar, Donatus’ Ars minor, adheres to a purely descriptive method, which consists in quoting a chosen headword and giving its full morphological paradigm. The second approach presents the case forms as being based on the genitive singular endings of the five declensions. I will argue that these two approaches were the outcome of the third approach, the regulae-method, which originated in the study of analogy in the early stages of Latin grammar. This heuristic method was originally designed as a discovery procedure for native speakers to account for the facts of their mother tongue.
Published online: 17 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.126.06luh
References (19)
Bibliography
Barwick, Karl. 1922. Remmius Palaemon und die römische ars grammatica. (= Philologus Suppl. 15.2.) Leipzig: Dieterich’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Charisius. Charisii artis grammaticae libri V. Ed. C. Barwick. (= Bibliotheca scriptorum graecorum et romanorum teubneriana). Leipzig: Teubner, 1964.Google Scholar
Consentius. Ars de duabus partibus orationis nomine et verbo. GL 5, 338–404.
Donatus. Ars minor and Ars maior (see Holtz 1981:5 85–674).
Diomedes. Diomedis artis grammatiae libri III. GL 1, 299–529.
Garcea, Alessandro. 2012. Caesar’s De analogia. Edition, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
GL = Grammatici latini. Ed. Heinrich Keil (8 vols [vol. 8 = Anecdota Helvetica , ed. Hermann Hagen], Leipzig 1857–1880.Google Scholar
Holtz, Louis. 1981. Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical. Étude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (IVe–IXe siècle) et édition critique. Paris: C.N.R.S.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. 1997. “Late Latin grammars in the Early Middle Ages: a typological history”. Grammar and Grammarians in the Early Middle Ages, 54–69. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Luhtala, Anneli. 2010. “Latin Schulgammatik and the Emergence of Grammatical Commentaries”. Condensed Texts − Condensing Texts, ed. by Marietta Horster and Christiane Reitz (= Palingenesia, 98), 209–243. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Varro’s Parts of Speech System and the Method of Definitions”. Language & Language Behavior. The Linguistic Society of St. Petersburg, 103–115.Google Scholar
Phocas. Ars Phocae de nomine et verbo. GL 5, 410–439.
Pompeius. Commentum Artis Donati. GL 5, 95–312.
Probus (Palladius). Catholica. GL 4, 3–43. Instituta artium. GL 4, 47–192.
Ps. Remmius Palaemon. PS. Remmii Palaemonis regulae. Introduzione, testo critico e commento a cura di Michela Rossellini. (= Collectanea grammatica latina 1). Hildesheim: Olms, 2001.Google Scholar
Ps. Augustine. PS. Remmii Palaemonis regulae. Introduzione, testo critico e commento a cura di Luca Martorelli. (= Collectanea grammatica latina 7). Hildesheim: Olms, 2001.Google Scholar
Quintilian. Institutio Oratoria with an English Translation by H.E. Butler. Loeb Classical Library . London: Heinemann, 1920.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert H. 1967. A Short History of Linguistics. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Servius. Commentarius in Artem Donati. GL 4, 405–428 and 443–448.