Cover not available
Part of
History of Linguistics 2014: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25–29 August 2014
Edited by Carlos Assunção, Gonçalo Fernandes and Rolf Kemmler
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 126] 2016
► pp. 233–246

A first history of Functional Grammar

ORCID logo
The history is told of Functional Grammar (FG), as developed by Simon C. Dik (1940–1995) of the University of Amsterdam and his co-workers. The presentation covers the genesis of the theory, its international recognition, the early death of its originator and main protagonist as well as Dik’s Nachleben in current linguistics, including the emergence of a successor theory in the form of Functional Discourse Grammar. The article assesses FG’s reception in linguistics, emphasizing its openness to incorporating ideas from other sources, and evaluates its contribution to linguistic theory and descriptive practice.
Published online: 17 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.126.18mac
References (48)
References
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio. 1972. Estudios de gramática funcional del español. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Allan, Keith. 2007. The Western Classical Tradition in Linguistics (= Equinox Textbooks & Surveys in Linguistics). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Anstey, Matthew P. 2004. “Functional Grammar from its Inception”. A New Architecture for Functional Grammar, ed. by J. Lachlan Mackenzie & María de los Ángeles Gómez-González (= Functional Grammar Series, 24), 23–72. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1968. “Nouns and Noun Phrases”. Universals in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms, 91–122. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bondarko, Alexander V. 1991. Functional Grammar: A Field Approach (= Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe, 35) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical Functional Syntax (= Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. 2003. Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories. 2 parts (= Studies in Language Companion Series, 63–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connolly, John H. & Simon C. Dik, eds. 1989. Functional Grammar and the Computer. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1967. “Review of Vachek (1966)”. Lingua 18.80–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1968. Coordination: Its Implications for the Theory of General Linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland (2nd printing 1972).Google Scholar
. 1969. “Seuren over Coordination ”. De Gids 132.243–262.Google Scholar
. 1972. “ Beginnen: semantische en syntaktische eigenschappen”. Spektator 2.165–179.Google Scholar
. 1975. “Oppervlaktestruktuur en dieptestruktuur”. Transformationeel-generatieve grammatica in artikelen, ed. by Hans Hulshof, 75–97. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
. 1977. “Vraagzinnen in een Funktionele Grammatika”. Spektator 6.407–412.Google Scholar
. 1978. Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Over Funktionele Grammatika”. Forum der Letteren 20.42–51.Google Scholar
. 1980a. “Seventeen Sentences: Basic Principles and Application of Functional Grammar”. Syntax and Semantics 13: Current Approaches to Syntax, ed. by Edith Moravcsik & Jessica R. Wirth, 45–75. New York etc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1980b. Studies in Functional Grammar. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. “On the Notion ‘Functional Explanation’”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 1.11–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1987. “Linguistically Motivated Knowledge Representation”. Language and Artificial Intelligence, ed. by Makoto Nagao, 145–170. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1992. Functional Grammar in Prolog: An Integrated Implementation for English, French, and Dutch. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. 2 parts, ed. by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C., A. Machtelt Bolkestein, Henk A. Combé, Casper de Groot, Jadranka Gvozdanović, Albert Rijksbaron & Co Vet. 1981. Predication and Expression in Functional Grammar. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel. 2003. Funcionalismo y lingüística: La Gramática Funcional de S.C. Dik. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
Groot, Casper de & Kees Hengeveld. 1996. Bibliography of the Published Works of Simon C. Dik. Available at [URL].Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2013. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1986. “Copular Verbs in a Functional Grammar of Spanish”. Linguistics 24:2.393–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. “Layers and Operators in Functional Grammar”. Journal of Linguistics 25:1.127–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun. 1978. “Funktionele grammatika: Naar aanleiding van S.C. Dik, Functional Grammar”. Forum der Letteren 19.293–312.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1963. “Efforts towards a Means-Ends Model of Language in Interwar Continental Linguistics”. Trends in Modern Linguistics, ed. by Christine Mohrmann, Frederick Norman, Alf Sommerfelt, 104–108. Utrecht & Antwerp: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva. 2011. “On Thetical Grammar”. Studies in Language 35:4.852–897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kooij, Jan G. 2002. “Simon Cornelis Dik”. Jaarboek van de Maatschappij der Nederlandse Letterkunde 2001. Leiden: Maatschappij der Nederlandse Letterkunde: 62–66.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1982. “Recensie van S.C. Dik, Studies in Functional Grammar”. De Nieuwe Taalgids 75.360–369.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 1988. “Functionele Grammatica: een thema, geen variatie”. TTT, Interdisciplinair tijdschrift voor Taal- en Tekstwetenschap 8.47–56.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1979. Grammaire fonctionnelle du français. Paris: Didier et St-Cloud.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter. 1969. “Review Article on Dik (1968)”. Lingua 23.349–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Philip. 1986. “On Certain Formal Properties of Dik’s Functional Grammar”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 1.171–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 1988. “Taalkunde in F-groot en F-klein”. TTT, Interdisciplinair tijdschrift voor Taal- en Tekstwetenschap 8:1.35–46.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 1983. “Funktionele grammatika: een notationele variant?” De Nieuwe Taalgids 76.19–26.Google Scholar
. 1986. “What Formalists Seem not to Understand about Functionalism”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 1.223–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Periñán Pascual, Carlos. 2012. “En defensa del procesamiento del lenguaje natural fundamentado en la lingüística teórica”. Onomázein 26.13–48.Google Scholar
Peterson, Thomas H. 1979. “Constraining Grammars through Proper Generalization: Multiple Order Grammar”. Linear Order and Generative Theory, ed. by Jürgen H. Meisel & Martin D. Pam, 99–163 (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A.M. 1969. “Echte en onechte taalkunde”. De Gids 132.25–42.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1991. Functional Grammar (= Linguistic Theory Guides). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef. 1966. The Linguistic School of Prague: An Introduction to its Theory and Practice. Bloomington, Ind. & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

[no author supplied]
2021. Bibliography. In Pragmatics and its Applications to TESOL and SLA, ► pp. 198 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.