Cover not available
Part of
History of Linguistics 2014: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25–29 August 2014
Edited by Carlos Assunção, Gonçalo Fernandes and Rolf Kemmler
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 126] 2016
► pp. 233–246

A first history of Functional Grammar

ORCID logo

The history is told of Functional Grammar (FG), as developed by Simon C. Dik (1940–1995) of the University of Amsterdam and his co-workers. The presentation covers the genesis of the theory, its international recognition, the early death of its originator and main protagonist as well as Dik’s Nachleben in current linguistics, including the emergence of a successor theory in the form of Functional Discourse Grammar. The article assesses FG’s reception in linguistics, emphasizing its openness to incorporating ideas from other sources, and evaluates its contribution to linguistic theory and descriptive practice.

Published online: 17 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.126.18mac
References
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio
1972 Estudios de gramática funcional del español. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Allan, Keith
2007 The Western Classical Tradition in Linguistics (= Equinox Textbooks & Surveys in Linguistics). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Anstey, Matthew P
2004 “Functional Grammar from its Inception”. A New Architecture for Functional Grammar, ed. by J. Lachlan Mackenzie & María de los Ángeles Gómez-González (= Functional Grammar Series, 24), 23–72. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Emmon
1968 “Nouns and Noun Phrases”. Universals in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms, 91–122. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bondarko, Alexander V
1991 Functional Grammar: A Field Approach (= Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe, 35) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
2001 Lexical Functional Syntax (= Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S
2003 Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories. 2 parts (= Studies in Language Companion Series, 63–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connolly, John H. & Simon C. Dik
eds. 1989 Functional Grammar and the Computer. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C
1967 “Review of Vachek (1966)”. Lingua 18.80–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1968 Coordination: Its Implications for the Theory of General Linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland (2nd printing 1972).Google Scholar
1969 “Seuren over Coordination ”. De Gids 132.243–262.Google Scholar
1972 “ Beginnen: semantische en syntaktische eigenschappen”. Spektator 2.165–179.Google Scholar
1975 “Oppervlaktestruktuur en dieptestruktuur”. Transformationeel-generatieve grammatica in artikelen, ed. by Hans Hulshof, 75–97. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
1977 “Vraagzinnen in een Funktionele Grammatika”. Spektator 6.407–412.Google Scholar
1978 Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1979 “Over Funktionele Grammatika”. Forum der Letteren 20.42–51.Google Scholar
1980a “Seventeen Sentences: Basic Principles and Application of Functional Grammar”. Syntax and Semantics 13: Current Approaches to Syntax, ed. by Edith Moravcsik & Jessica R. Wirth, 45–75. New York etc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1980b Studies in Functional Grammar. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1986 “On the Notion ‘Functional Explanation’”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 1.11–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 “Linguistically Motivated Knowledge Representation”. Language and Artificial Intelligence, ed. by Makoto Nagao, 145–170. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1989 The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1992 Functional Grammar in Prolog: An Integrated Implementation for English, French, and Dutch. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 The Theory of Functional Grammar. 2 parts, ed. by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C., A. Machtelt Bolkestein, Henk A. Combé, Casper de Groot, Jadranka Gvozdanović, Albert Rijksbaron & Co Vet
1981 Predication and Expression in Functional Grammar. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel
2003 Funcionalismo y lingüística: La Gramática Funcional de S.C. Dik. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
Groot, Casper de & Kees Hengeveld
1996 Bibliography of the Published Works of Simon C. Dik. Available at [URL].Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
2013 Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1986 “Copular Verbs in a Functional Grammar of Spanish”. Linguistics 24:2.393–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 “Layers and Operators in Functional Grammar”. Journal of Linguistics 25:1.127–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun
1978 “Funktionele grammatika: Naar aanleiding van S.C. Dik, Functional Grammar”. Forum der Letteren 19.293–312.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1963 “Efforts towards a Means-Ends Model of Language in Interwar Continental Linguistics”. Trends in Modern Linguistics, ed. by Christine Mohrmann, Frederick Norman, Alf Sommerfelt, 104–108. Utrecht & Antwerp: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva
2011 “On Thetical Grammar”. Studies in Language 35:4.852–897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kooij, Jan G
2002 “Simon Cornelis Dik”. Jaarboek van de Maatschappij der Nederlandse Letterkunde 2001. Leiden: Maatschappij der Nederlandse Letterkunde: 62–66.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan
1982 “Recensie van S.C. Dik, Studies in Functional Grammar”. De Nieuwe Taalgids 75.360–369.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
1988 “Functionele Grammatica: een thema, geen variatie”. TTT, Interdisciplinair tijdschrift voor Taal- en Tekstwetenschap 8.47–56.Google Scholar
Martinet, André
1979 Grammaire fonctionnelle du français. Paris: Didier et St-Cloud.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter
1969 “Review Article on Dik (1968)”. Lingua 23.349–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Philip
1986 “On Certain Formal Properties of Dik’s Functional Grammar”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 1.171–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
1988 “Taalkunde in F-groot en F-klein”. TTT, Interdisciplinair tijdschrift voor Taal- en Tekstwetenschap 8:1.35–46.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
1983 “Funktionele grammatika: een notationele variant?” De Nieuwe Taalgids 76.19–26.Google Scholar
1986 “What Formalists Seem not to Understand about Functionalism”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 1.223–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Periñán Pascual, Carlos
2012 “En defensa del procesamiento del lenguaje natural fundamentado en la lingüística teórica”. Onomázein 26.13–48.Google Scholar
Peterson, Thomas H
1979 “Constraining Grammars through Proper Generalization: Multiple Order Grammar”. Linear Order and Generative Theory, ed. by Jürgen H. Meisel & Martin D. Pam, 99–163 (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947 Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A.M
1969 “Echte en onechte taalkunde”. De Gids 132.25–42.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
1991 Functional Grammar (= Linguistic Theory Guides). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef
1966 The Linguistic School of Prague: An Introduction to its Theory and Practice. Bloomington, Ind. & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

[no author supplied]
2021. Bibliography. In Pragmatics and its Applications to TESOL and SLA, ► pp. 198 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.