Cover not available
Part of
Last Papers in Linguistic Historiography
E.F.K. Koerner †
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 128] 2020
► pp. 163–192

Chapter 7
Edward Sapir

Assessments of his life and work

Article outline
  • 1.Introductory observations
  • 2.Obituaries and biographical sketches, 1939–1952
  • 3.Intellectual influences and exchanges
  • 4.Comments on Sapir’s work in the first half of the 20th century
  • 5.The reception of Sapir’s ideas in the second half of the 20th century
  • 6.The discussion of particular aspects of Sapir’s theories
    • 6.1Language typology and language classification
    • 6.2Sapir’s contribution to phonological theory
    • 6.3Sapir’s contribution to historical-comparative linguistics
    • 6.4Sapir’s ‘psychology of culture’ and other non-linguistic ideas
  • 7.Edward Sapir and the so-called ‘Sapir-Whorf hypothesis’
  • 8.Sapir’s other engagements, including his literary pursuits
  • 9.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.128.c7
References (171)
References
Allen, Robert J[ohn]. 1970. The Work and Thought of Edward Sapir in Anthropology: An analysis. An Honors Paper presented to the Faculty of the Department of Anthropology, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 20 April 1970, ii, 107 typed pp.Google Scholar
Allen, Robert J. 1974. “The Individual, His Culture and His Rights”. The Journal of Intergroup Relations 3:4.3–12.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1990. “The Structure of Drift”. Historical Linguistics 1987 ed. by Henning Andersen & E. F. K. Koerner, 1–20. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker Makkai, Valerie. 1972. Phonological Theory: Evolution and current practice, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Benedict, Ruth (Fulton). 1939. “Edward Sapir”. American Anthropologist 41.465–477. (Pp. 465–468; repr. as Item 4 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernier-Montminy, Hélène. 1976. “La recherche anthropologique au Musée National du Canada, 1910 à 1925”. Bulletin of the Canadian Ethnology Society / Société d’Ethnologie Canadienne No. 1 (Dec. 1976), 28–50. (Rev. version published in Historiographia Linguistica 11:3.397–412 [1984] = Item 54 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
Berthoff, Ann E. 1988. “Sapir and the Two Tasks of Language”. Semiotica 71: 1/2.1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. “Semiotics and Edward Sapir”. Semiotic Web 1990: Recent developments in theory and history ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, Jean Umiker-Sebeok & Evan P. Young, 47–59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1922. Review of Sapir (1921). The Classical Weekly 15.142–143 (13 March 1922). (Repr. as Item 32 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1939. “Edward Sapir”. International Journal of American Linguistics 10.58–63. (Pp. 58–59 repr. as Item 1 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Henry. 1923. Review of Sapir (1921). The Queen’s Quarterly 30:4.389–394.Google Scholar
Bright, James W[ilson]. 1922. Review of Sapir (1921). Modern Language Notes 37:3.188–192.Google Scholar
Bright, James W. 1991. Bright’s Old English Grammar and Reader. Ed. by Frederick G[omes] Cassidy & Richard N. Ringler. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bright, William. 1991. “Sapir and Distant Linguistic Relationship”. Bulletin of the Edward Sapir Society of Japan 19.19–25.Google Scholar
Cain, Michael. 1980. “Edward Sapir and Gestalt Psychology”. Anthropological Linguistics 22.141–150. [Cf. the reply by Murray (1981b).]Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1988. Review article on Greenberg (1987). Language 64:3.591–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1951. Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew. M.A. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania. (Revised version published, New York: Garland, 1979.)Google Scholar
Cole, Douglas. 1973. “The Origins of Canadian Anthropology, 1850–1910”. Journal of Canadian Studies 8.33–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Fay-Cooper. 1952. “Eminent Personalities of the Half Century”. American Anthropologist 54.157–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collinson, W[illiam] E[dward]. 1924. Review of Sapir (1921), together with Saussure (21922). Modern Language Review 19.253–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowan, William & Michael K. Foster & Konrad Koerner, eds. 1986. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality: Proceedings of the Edward Sapir Centenary Conference (Ottawa, 1–3 Oct. 1984). (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 41.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, xiv, 627 pp.; illustr.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dallaire, Louise, ed. 1984. Edward Sapir’s Correspondence: An alphabetical and chronological inventory, 1910–1925. Ottawa: National Museum of Man. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Regna (Diebold). 1976. “The Sapir Years at the National Museum, Ottawa”. The History of Canadian Anthropology: Proceedings of the plenary session of the Canadian Ethnology Society ed. by James Friedman, 98–121. Hamilton, Ont.: Canadian Ethnology Society. (Rev. version first published in Koerner, ed. 1984.159–178; repr in Volume II, Item 53 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna. 1990a. Edward Sapir: Linguist, anthropologist, humanist. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1990b. “Franz Boas, Edward Sapir, and the Americanist Text Tradition”. Historiographia Linguistica 17:1/2.129–144. (Repr. as Item 72 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991: “On the Occasion of Silversteinian Musings on the State of Sapiriana”. Historiographia Linguistica 18:2/3.419–424 (1991). [Reply to Silverstein 1991.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. And Along Came Boas: Continuity and revolution in the emergence of Boasian anthropology in America. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Indo-European Methodology, Bloomfield’s Central Algonquian and Sapir’s Distant Genetic Relationships”. The Emergence of the Modern Language Sciences: Studies on the transition from historical-comparative to structural linguistics in honour of E. F. K. Koerner ed. by Sheila Embleton, John E. Joseph & Hans-Josef Niederehe, vol. II, 3–16. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Edward Sapir’s Thought Experiment in the Interdisciplines of Cultural Anthropology and Psychiatry”. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes 64:1.17–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Regna & Dell Hymes. 1986. “Edward Sapir’s Six Unit Classification of American Indian Languages: The search for time perspective”. Essays in the History of Western Linguistics ed. by Theodora Bynon & Frank Palmer, 202–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna & Judith Irvine. 1997. “Edward Sapir, January 26, 1884–February 4, 1939”. National Academy of Sciences: Biographiccal memoirs 71, 281–300. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Davis, Jack L. 1976. “The Whorf Hypothesis and Native American Literature”. South Dakota Review 14:2.59–72.Google Scholar
De Angulo (y Mayo), Jaime. 1922 “A New View of Language [= Review of Sapir (1921)]”. The Canadian Bookman (May 1922), p.170.Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, David W. 1999. “Textuality and the ‘Voices’ of Informants: The case of Edward Sapir’s 1929 Navajo field work”. Anthropological Linguistics 41:2.165–192.Google Scholar
Dürbeck, Helmut. 1975. “Neuere Untersuchungen zur Sapir-Whorf Hypothese”. Linguistics No. 145.5–45.Google Scholar
Edgerton, Franklin. 1940. “Edward Sapir”. The American Philosophical Society Yearbook 1939.460–463. (Pp. 460–462 repr. as Item 2 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
Eramian, Gregory M. 1988. “Edward Sapir and the Prague School”. Historiographia Linguistica 15: 3.377–399. (Repr. as Item 19 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Jon, Marion Gymnich & Ansgar Nünning. 1997. “Wilhelm von Humboldt, Edward Sapir, and the Constructivist Framework”. Historiographia Linguistica 24: 3.285–306. (Repr. as Item 77 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández Casas, María Xosé. 2000. “El alcance de la tipología en la obra de Edward Sapir”. Verba: Anuario galego de filoloxía (Santiago de Compostela) 27.249–287.Google Scholar
. 2004. Edward Sapir en la lingüística actual: Lineas de continuidad en la historia de la lingüística. Santiago de Compostela: Servizo de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico. [Cf. the review by Natsuko Kato in Bulletin of the Edward Sapir Society of Japan 20.119–131 (2006).]Google Scholar
. 2005. “Analysing Language from a Mentalistic Viewpoint: Edward Sapir’s mentalism”. Bulletin of the Edward Sapir Society of Japan 19.1–14.Google Scholar
Ferry, Marie-Paule. 1970. “Sapir et l’ethnolinguistique”. Langages No. 18: L’ethnolinguistique ed. by Bernard Pottier, 14–21. Paris: Didier/Larousse.Google Scholar
Foster, Michael K. 1988. “Te Impact of Sapir’s Six-Phylum Linguistic Scheme on Speculation on North-American Indian Culture History: A bibliographical essay”. Anthropological Linguistics 30:1.37–67.Google Scholar
Fought, John, ed. 1999. Leonard Bloomfield: Critical assessments of leading linguists. 3 vols. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frederickson, Jon. 2001. “Sapir’s Vision on Culture and Personality”. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes 64: 1.32–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gipper, Helmut. 1972. Gibt es ein sprachliches Relativitätsprinzip? Untersuchungen zur Sapir–Whorf Hypothese. Frankfurt/Main: S. Fischer.Google Scholar
. 1976. “Die Sapir–Whorf Hypothese: Verbalismus oder Wissenschaft: Eine Entgegnung auf die Kritik Dürbecks”. Linguistics No. 178.25–46.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1996. “Harrington, John Peabody”. Lexicon Grammaticorum: Who’s Who in the History of Western Linguistics ed. by Harro Stammerjohann, 389–390. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. (2nd ed., Lexicon Grammaticorum: A biobibliographical companion to the history of linguistics ed. by Harro Stammerjohann, 611. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.)Google Scholar
Goldberg, G[eorge?]. 1922. “An Exclusive Art [= Review of Sapir 1921]”. Christian Science Monitor (1 Feb. 1922).Google Scholar
Golla, Victor, ed. 1984. The Sapir-Kroeber Corresponndence. (= Survey of California and other Indian languages, Report 6.) Berkeley: University of Calfornia Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “The Sapirian Approach to Language”. History of the Language Sciences: An international handbook on the evolution of the study of language from the beginnings to the present / Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Entwicklung der Sprachforschung von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart / Histoire des Sciences du Langage: Manuel international d’histoire des études linguistiques des origines à nos jours. Tome II ed. by E. F. K. Koerner et al., 1935–1950. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H[arold]. 1951. Review of Sapir (1949). American Anthropologist 52.516–518. (Repr. as Item 36 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1971. Language, Culture, and Communication: Essays by Joseph H. Greenberg. Ed. by Anwar S. Dil. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregores, Emma. 1953. Review of Sapir (1949). Filología (Buenos Aires) 2.210–220.Google Scholar
Guxman, M[irra] M[oiseevna]. 1954. “E. Sapir i ètnografičeskaja lingvistika [E. Sapir and ethnographic linguistics]”. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 3:1.110–127.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R[osamond]. 1953. “Sapir and the Training of Anthropological Linguists”. American Anthropologist 55.447–450. (Repr. as Item 41 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1976. “Boas, Sapir, and Bloomfield”. American Indian Languages and American Linguistics: The Second Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America ed. by Wallace L. Chafe, 59–69. Lisse/Holland: Peter de Ridder Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haase, Martin. 2001. “Sprachtypologie bei Edward Sapir”. Language Typology and Language Universals: An international handbook ed. by Martin Haspelmath et al., 264–266. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Handler, Richard. 1983. “The Dainty and the Hungry Man: Literature and anthropology in the work of Edward Sapir”. Observers Observed: Essays on ethnographic fieldwork ed. by George W. Stocking (= History of Anthropology, 1), 208–231. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (= Item 79 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
. 1984. “Sapir’s Poetic Experience”. American Anthropologist 86.416–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Zellig S[abbettai]. 1951. Review article on Sapir (1949). Language 27. 288–333. (Repr. as Item 39 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. 1968. “Sapir, Edward. II: Contributions to linguistics”. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 14.13–14. New York: Macmillan & Free Press.Google Scholar
Harrold, E[rnest] W[illiam]. 1922. Review of Sapir (1921). The Ottawa Citizen of 16 Feb. 1922. [Adapted under the title of “The Wonders of Speech” in the Toronto Daily Star on 22 Feb. 1922.]Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible, eds. 2001. Language Typology and Language Universals: An international handbook. 2 tomes. Berlin New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Tetsuro. 1984. “Edward Sapir in Japan: A survey of translations, 1940–1983”. Historiographia Linguistica 11:3.461–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1939. “Edward Sapir”. Acta Linguistica 1.76–77. (Repr. as Item 7 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F[rancis]. 1954. “Two Models of Grammatical Description”. Word 10.210–231. (Repr. in Joos, ed. 1957.386–398.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1987. “Letters from Bloomfield to Michelson and Sapir”. Historiographia Linguistica 14: 1/2.39–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoijer, Harry. 1941. “Methods in the Classification of American Indian Languages”. Spier et al. 1941.1–14.Google Scholar
. 1946. “Introduction”. Linguistic Structures of Native America. By Harry Hoijer et al. (= Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, 6), 9–29. New York: Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.Google Scholar
. 1951. “Cultural Implications of Some Navajo Linguistic Categories”. Language 27.111–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1954. “Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis”. Language and Culture: Conference on the interrelationship of language and other aspects of culture ed. by H. Hoijer, 92–105. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Repr., 1967.)Google Scholar
Hooton, Earnest A[lbert]. 1940. “Edward Sapir”. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 74: 6.157–159 (Nov. 1940).Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell H[athaway]. 1970. “Linguistic Method in Ethnography”. Method and Theory in Linguistics ed. by Paul L[ucian] Garvin, 249–311. The Hague: Mouton. (Repr., with revisions, in Hymes 1983.135–244.)Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1983. Essays in the History of Linguistic Anthropology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [Cf. the review article by Murray (1984).] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith, ed. 1994. Edward Sapir, The Psychology of Culture. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. (Cf. the review by Stephen O. Murray in Historiographia Linguistica 22: 3.419–421 [1995].)Google Scholar
Jenness, Diamond. 1939. “Edward Sapir”. Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada for 1939, 3rd series, 33.151–153 (1940). (Repr. as Item 3 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jessel, Levic. 1978. “Whorf: The differentiation of language”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 18.83–110.Google Scholar
Joos, Martin, ed. 1957. Readings in Linguistics [I]: The development of descriptive linguistics in America since 1925 [later changed to: … 1925–56]. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies. (4th ed., Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1966.)Google Scholar
Joseph, John E[arl]. 1996. “The Immediate Sources of the ‘Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis’”. Historiographia Linguistica 23:3.365–404. (Revised version, with ‘immediate’ omitted, in Joseph 2002.47–105. Repr. as Item 76.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, John E. 2002. From Whitney to Chomsky: Essays in the history of American linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E[rnst] F[rideryk] K[onrad]. 1977. “The Humbodltian Trend in Linguistics”. Studies in Descriptive and Historical Linguistics: Festschrift for Winfred P. Lehmann ed. by Paul J. Hopper, 145–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, [E. F.] Konrad, ed. & introd. 1984. Edward Sapir: Appraisals of his life and work. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 36.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, xxviii, 224 pp.; 8 photographs, 6 facsimiles. [Reviewed by John B. Carroll in Historiographia Linguistica 13:1.103–106 (1986).] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 1990. “Wilhelm von Humboldt and North American Ethnolinguistics: Boas (1894) — Hymes (1961)”. Historiographia Linguistica 17.1/2. 11–128.Google Scholar
1992. “The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis: A preliminary history and a bibliographical essay”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2:2.173–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Professing Linguistic Historiography. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. “Towards a ‘Full Pedigree’ of the ‘Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis’: From Locke to Lucy”. Explorations in Linguistic Relativity ed. by Martin Pütz & Marjolijn Verspoor, 1–23. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. “On the Sources of the ‘Sapir-Whorf-Hypothesis’”. Toward a History of American Linguistics by Koerner, Chap. 3 (= 39–62). London & New York: Routledge. (Repr. as Item 78 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, ed. 2007. Edward Sapir: Critical Assessments of Leading Linguists. 3 vols. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A[lfred] L[ouis]. 1922. “A Study of Language [= Review of Sapir 1921]”. The Dial 72: 3.314–117. (Excerpted as Item 21 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1984 [1959]. “Reflections on Edward Sapir, Scholar and Man”. Koerner, ed. 1984.131–139.Google Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko. 1925. Review of Sapir (1921). English Studies 7.177–179.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T[almach]. 1972. “Another Look at Drift”. Linguistic Change and Generative Theory: Essays from the UCLA conference on historical linguistics in the perspective of transformational theory ed. by Robert P. Stockwell & Ronald K. S. Macauley, 172–198. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Penny. 1996. The Whorf Theory Complex: A critical reconstruction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Léon, Pierre, Henry Schogt & Edward Burstynsky, eds. 1977. La Phonologie 1: Les écoles et les théories. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Lowie, Robert H[arry]. 1919. Review of Sapir (1916). American Anthropologist 21.75–77. (Repr. as Item 31.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowie, Robert H. 1923. Review of Sapir (1921). American Anthropologist 25.90–93. (Repr. as Item 34 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 [1956]. “Comments on Edward Sapir, his Personality and Scholarship”. Koerner, ed. 1984.21–30. (Repr. as Item 20 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1996. “The Scope of Linguistic Relativity: An analysis and review of empirical research”. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity ed. by John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson, 37–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1976. “What Did Edward Sapir Mean by Drift?”. Romance Philology 30.622.Google Scholar
. 1981. “Drift, Slope, and Slant: Background of, and variations upon, a Sapirian theme”. Language 57: 3.535–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984 [1959]. “The Prospects of a Sapir Renaissance in Linguistics”. Historiographia Linguistica 11:3.389–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malotki, Ekkehart. 1979. Hopi-Raum: Eine sprachwissenschaftliche Analyse der Raum-Vor-stellungen in der Hopi-Sprache. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
. 1983. Hopi Time: A linguistic analysis of the temporal concepts of the Hopi language. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, David G[oodman]. 1949. “Introduction”. Sapir (1949), v–xii.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, David G. 1968. “Edward Sapir I: Contribution to cultural anthropology”. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 14.9–13. New York: Macmillan & Free Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D[avid]. 1967. “Sapir’s Phonologic Representation”. International Journal of American Linguistics 33.106–111. (Repr. as Item 44.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1922. Review of Sapir (1921), together with Jespersen (1922) and Vendryes (1921). Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 23:2.1–9, especially pp. 6–8.Google Scholar
Mikuš, Radivoj Franciscus. 1953. “Edward Sapir et la syntagmatique”. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 11.11–30.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O[mar]. 1981a. “The Canadian ‘Winter’ of Edward Sapir”. Historiographia Linguistica 8.63–68. (Repr. as Item 2 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Stephen O. 1981b. “Sapir’s Gestalt”. Anthropological Linguistics 23: 1.8–12. [Reply to Cain (1980).] (Repr. as Item 15 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
1984. Review article on Hymes (1983). Historiographia Linguistica 11: 3.449–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985: “A Pre-Boasian Sapir?”. Historiographia Linguistica 12: 1/2.267–269. (Repr. as Item 16 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
1994. Theory Groups and the Study of Language in North America. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 69.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins [Chap. V, “Sapir” (77–111).] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Stephen O. & Wayne Dynes. 1986: “Edward Sapir’s Coursework in Linguistics and Anthropology”. Historiographia Linguistica 13:1.125–130. (Repr. as Item 17 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, Stanley S[tewart]. 1951. Review of Sapir (1949). International Journal of American Linguistics 17.180–186. (Repr. as Item 38 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Charles Kay & Ivor Armstrong Richards. 1923. The Meaning of Meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. London: Methuen; New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. [Frequently reprinted.]Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith. 1996. “Edward Sapir”. Lexicon Grammaticorum: Who’s Who in the History of Western Linguistics ed. by Harro Stammerjohann, 822–823. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. (2nd ed., Lexicon Grammaticorum: A biobibliographical companion to the history of linguistics ed. by Harro Stammerjohann, 1328–1329. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.)Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L[ee]. 1971. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. 2nd, rev. ed. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1984. “Some Teachers who Helped Me”. Historiographia Linguistica 11:1.493–495. (Repr. as Item 25 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preston, Richard J[oseph]. 1966. “Edward Sapir’s Anthropology: Style, structure and method”. American Anthropologist 68.1105–1128. (Repr. as Item 43 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preston, Richard J. 1980. “Reflections on Edward Sapir’s Anthropology in Canada”. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 17:4.367–374. (Repr. as Item 70 in Koerner, ed. 2007.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prokosch, Eduard. 1922. Review of Sapir (1921), together with Schrijnen (1921). Journal of English and Germanic Philology 21:2.353–357 (1922).Google Scholar
Remy, Arthur F[rank] J[oseph]. 1922. Review of Sapir (1921). The Literary Review of the New York Evening Post of 6 May 1922.Google Scholar
Robins, John D[aniel]. 1922. Review of Sapir (1921). The Canadian Forum 2: 24.762 and 764 (Sept. 1922).Google Scholar
Rodseth, Lars. 1998. “Distributive Models of Culture: A Sapirian alternative to essentialism”. American Anthropologist 100: 1.55–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Loris S. 1961. The National Museum of Canada 1910–1960. Ottawa: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources, v, 37 pp.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1907 [1905]. “Herder’s ‘Ursprung der Sprache’”. Modern Philology 5.109–142. (Repr. in Historiographia Linguistica 11:3.355–388 [1984] and in Sapir 1990–, vol. I, 179–194.)Google Scholar
. 1912. “Language and Environment”. American Anthropologist n.s. 14. 226–242. (Repr. in Sapir 1949.89–103 and in Sapir 1990–, vol. I, 135–149.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1916. Time Perspective in Aboriginal American Culture: A study in method. (= Canada, Department of Mines; Geological Survey, Memoir, 90 = Anthropological Series, 13.) Ottawa: Government Printing Bureau. (Repr., with a few omissions, in Sapir 1949.389–462.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1917. Dreams and Gibes. Boston: The Poet Lore Co.Google Scholar
. 1921. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. (Also published Oxford: Oxford University Press; London: Humphrey Milford, [1922].)Google Scholar
. 1925. “Sound Patterns in Language”. Language 1.37–51. (Repr. in Sapir 1949.33–45 and in Sapir 1990–, vol. I, 219–226.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1929. “The Status of Linguistics as a Science”. Language 5.207–214. (Repr. in Sapir 1949.160–166.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1933. “La réalité psychologique des phonèmes”. Revue de Psychologie normale et pathologique 30.247–265. [English original version first published in Sapir 1949.46–60; both reprinted in Sapir 1990–. Vol. I, 518–538, 539–555.]Google Scholar
. 1949. Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Personality. Ed. with an introduction by David G. Mandelbaum. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Repr., with a “Foreword to the [first] paperback edition” [iii-iv] and a “Epilogue” by Dell H. Hymes [598–600], 1985.)Google Scholar
. 1959. “Selections from the Correspondence of Edward Sapir with Ruth Benedict, 1923–1938”. An Anthropologist at Work: Writings of Ruth Benedict ed. by Margaret Mead, 158–197. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
. 1990–. The Collected Works of Edward Sapir. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [9 out of 16 volumes scheduled for publication.]Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward & Leslie Spier. 1930. “Wishram Ethnology”. University of Washington Publications in Anthropology 3.151–300. (Repr. in Sapir 1990–. Vol. 7, 357–506.)Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward & Morris Swadesh. 1932. The Expression of the Ending-Point Relation in English, French, and German. Ed. by Alice V[anderbilt] Morris. Baltimore, Md.: Waverly Press for the Linguistic Society of America. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1939. Nootka Texts: Texts and ethnological narratives with grammatical notes and lexical materials. Baltimore, Md.: Waverly Press for the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
. 1946. “American Indian Grammatical Categories”. Word 2.103–112. [For 1953, 1955, and 1960 publications as well as 1966 and 1978 reprints of the 1932 and 1939 studies, see the Sapir’s Bibliography in Koerner, ed. 2007.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1922 [1916]. Cours de linguistique générale. Publié par Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye avec la collaboration de Albert Riedlinger. 2e édition. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schrijnen, Josef. 1921. Einführung in das Studium der indogermanischen Sprachwissenschaft. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael. 1987. “Sapir’s Concept of Drift in Semiotic Perspective”. Semiotica 67.159–171. (Repr. as Item 47 in Koerner, ed. 2007) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1991. “Problems of Sapir Historiography”. Historiographia Linguistica 18:1.181–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith Stark, Thomas C. 1992. “El método de Sapir para establecer relaciones genéticas remotas”. Reflexiones Lingüísticas y Literarias I: Lingüística ed. by Rebeca Barriga Villanueva & Josefina García Fajardo, 17–42. México: Colegio de México. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommerfelt, Alf. 1952. Review of Sapir (1949). Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 16.465–467.Google Scholar
Spier, Leslie. 1939a. “Edward Sapir”. Science 89.237–238. (Repr. as Item 6 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
. 1939b. “Edward Sapir”. Man 39.92–93.Google Scholar
Spier, Leslie, A[lfred] Irwing Hallowell & Stanley S[tewart] Newman, eds. 1941. Language, Culture, and Personality: Essays in memory of Edward Sapir. Menasha, Wis.: Edward Sapir Memorial Fund.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1939. “Edward Sapir”. Language 15.132–135.Google Scholar
. 1961. “The Culture Historic Implications of Sapir’s Linguistic Classification”. A William Cameron Townsend en el vigésimo quinto aniversario del Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, 663–671. México, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia. (Repr. as Item 42 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
. 1971. The Origin and Diversification of Language. Ed. by Joel Sherzer. With a foreword and an article on “Morris Swadesh: From the first Yale school to world prehistory” by Dell Hymes. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre. 1991. “Notes sur la linguistique générale en 1921–1922. Avec l’édition de deux lettres de Joseph Vendryes à Edward Sapir”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 1.185–191.Google Scholar
Tarpent, Marie-Lucie. 1997. “Tsimshianic and Penutian: Problems, methods, results, and implications”. International Journal of American Linguistics 63.65–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trager, George L[eonard]. 1951. Review note on Sapir (1949). Studies in Linguistics 9:1.18–19.Google Scholar
Trager, George L. 1959. “The Systematization of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis”. Anthropological Linguistics 1:1.31–38.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N[ikolaj] S[ergeevič]. 2001. Studies in General Linguistics and Language Structure. Transl. by Marvin Taylor & Anatoly Liberman. Durham, N.C. & London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Van West, John. 1974. The History of Anthropology in Canada. Toronto: Dept. of Anthropology, University of Toronto, mimeographed, 47 pp.Google Scholar
Vendryes, Joseph. 1921. Le Langage: Introduction linguistique à l’histoire. Paris: La Renaissance du Livre. (Repr., with additions, Paris: Albin Michel, 1950.)Google Scholar
. 1925. Language: A linguistic introduction to history. Transl. from the French by Paul Radin. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. (Repr., New York: Barnes & Noble, 1951; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1952.)Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1975. “An Explanation of Drift”. Word Order and Word Order Change ed. by Charles N. Li, 269–305. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Voegelin, C[harles] F[rederick]. 1942. “Sapir: Insight and rigor”. American Anthropologist 44.322–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voegelin, C. F. 1952. “Edward Sapir”. Word Study 27:4.1–3. (Repr. as Item 40 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
Voegelin, C. F. & F[lorence] M[argaret] Voegelin. 1963. “On the History of Structuralizing in 20th-Century America”. Anthropological Linguistics 5:1.12–37.Google Scholar
Warnotte, D[aniel]. 1922. Review of Sapir (1921), together with Vendryes (1921). Revue de l’Institut de Sociologie (Brussels) 2:2.309–314 (March 1922), esp. pp. 312–213.Google Scholar
Woolfson, A. Peter. 1970. “An Explanation of Sapir’s Concept of Language in the Light of Ethnological Theory and Piagetian Developmental Psychology”. Language Sciences No. 11.8–10 (August 1970). (Revised version published as Item 64 in Koerner, ed. 2007.)Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Jacob. 1922. Review of Sapir (1921). The Nation (New York, 8 March 1922).Google Scholar