References (34)
References
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco, Nicola Grandi & Bernhard Wälchli. 2010. “Coordination in Compounding”. Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding edited by S. Scalise & I. Vogel, 177–198. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte L.M. 2017. Nominal Apposition in Indo-European: Its forms and functions, and its evolution in Latin-Romance. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2017. Compounds and Compounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belvalkar, S. K., translator. 1924. Kāvyādarśa of Daṇḍin: Sanskrit text and English translation. Poona: The Oriental Book-Supplying Agency.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2009. “Compounding and Construction Morphology”. The Oxford Handbook of Compounding edited by R. Lieber & P. Štekauer, 201–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candotti, Maria Piera & Tiziana Pontillo. 2013. “The Earlier Paninian Tradition on the Imperceptible Sign”. Signless Signification in Ancient India and Beyond edited by T. Pontillo & M. P. Candotti, 99–153. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Late Sanskrit Literary Theorists and the Role of Grammar in Focusing the Separateness of Metaphor and Simile”. Journal of Indian Philosophy 45:2.349–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Lexical Subordination in Derivation and Compounding”. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 57:2.11–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardona, George. 1997. Pāṇini: His work and its tradition, vol. I: Background and Introduction. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and Linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggeling, Julius, translator. 1882–1900. The Satapatha-Brâhmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School, books I-XIV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Robert P. & Sally J. Sutherland Goldman, translators. 1996. The Rāmāyaṇa of Vālmīki: An epic of Ancient India, vol. V, Sundarakāṇḍa. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio. This volume. “Can Linguistics and History of Linguistics Profit from each other?”. History of Linguistics 2021. Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS 15), Milan, 28 August–1 September edited by S. Raynaud, M.P. Tenchini, & E. Galazzi, 14–30. Amsterdam & Philadeplhia: John Benjamins.
Grandi, Nicola. 2006. “Considerazioni sulla definizione e la classificazione dei composti”. Annali online di Ferrara — Lettere 1:1.31–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guevara, Emiliano & Sergio Scalise. 2009. “Searching for Universals in Compounding”. Universals of Language Today edited by S. Scalise, E. Magni, & A. Bisetto. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 76.101–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie W. & Joel P. Brereton, translators, 2014. The Rigveda: The earliest religious poetry of India, 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2009. “On the Architecture of Pāṇini’s Grammar”. Sanskrit Computational Linguistics: Proceedings of the First and Second International Symposia, Rocquencourt, 29–31 October 2007, Providence, 15–17 May 2008 edited by G. Huet, A. Kulkarni, & P. Scharf. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5402.33–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowe, John J. 2015. “The Syntax of Sanskrit Compounds”. Language 91:3.71–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2024. Modern Linguistics in Ancient India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masini, Francesca & Sergio Scalise. 2012. “Italian Compounds”. Probus 24.61–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mocci, Davide. 2023. “Pāṇini and the non-Head (upasarjana) of Attributive Endocentric Compounds”. Bhasha: Journal of South Asian Linguistics, Philology and Grammatical Traditions 2:2.279–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mocci, Davide & Tiziana Pontillo. 2019. “Predication in Aṣṭādhyāyī 2.1.56: Syntactic analysis of a karmadhāraya compound”. Aevum 93:1.3–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2016. Impossible Languages. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “The Geometry of Predication: A configurational derivation of the defining property of clause structure”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375:1791.1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olivelle, Patrick. 1998. The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated text and translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pontillo, Tiziana. 2003a. “Morfi ‘zeromorfi’ in Pāṇini: un’introduzione alle regole specifiche di formazione con zero fonologico nella posizione di dati morfemi”. ΑIWΝ 22.129–184.Google Scholar
. 2003b. “La definizione di upasarjana- in Pāṇini”. Atti del Primo Incontro Genovese di Studi Vedici e Pāṇiniani, Genova, 16 July 2002 edited by R. Ronzitti & G. Borghi, 21–35. Recco: Le Mani.Google Scholar
. 2021. “Did the Sanskrit Model Bring «True Enlightenment to European Scholars» when they Analysed and Classified the Bahuvrīhi Compounds?”. Studi Classici e Orientali 67.497–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Antonietta Bisetto. 2009. “The Classification of Compounds”. The Oxford Handbook of Compounding edited by R. Lieber & P. Štekauer, 34–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Antonio Fábregas. 2010. “The Head in Compounding”. Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding edited by S. Scalise & I. Vogel, 109–126. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Irene Vogel. 2010. “Why Compounding?”. Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding edited by S. Scalise & I. Vogel, 1–18. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speijer, Jacob Samuel. 1886. Sanskrit Syntax. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar