Limiting the Arbitrary
Linguistic naturalism and its opposites in Plato's Cratylus and modern theories of language
| University of Edinburgh
The idea that some aspects of language are ‘natural’, while others are arbitrary, artificial or derived, runs all through modern linguistics, from Chomsky’s GB theory and Minimalist program and his concept of E- and I-language, to Greenberg’s search for linguistic universals, Pinker’s views on regular and irregular morphology and the brain, and the markedness-based constraints of Optimality Theory. This book traces the heritage of this linguistic naturalism back to its locus classicus, Plato’s dialogue Cratylus. The first half of the book is a detailed examination of the linguistic arguments in the Cratylus. The second half follows three of the dialogue’s naturalistic themes through subsequent linguistic history — natural grammar and conventional words, from Aristotle to Pinker; natural dialect and artificial language, from Varro to Chomsky; and invisible hierarchies, from Jakobson to Optimality Theory — in search of a way forward beyond these seductive yet spurious and limiting dichotomies.
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 96] 2000. x, 224 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Foreword | p. vii
-
Introduction
-
Natural and Unnatural Language | p. 1
-
Part one: cratylus
-
1. Nature and Convention: Cratylus 383a1–391d1 | p. 13
-
2. Words and Truth: Cratylus 391d2–422e1 | p. 39
-
3. Imitation and Essence: Cratylus 422e1–440e1 | p. 59
-
Part two: after cratylus
-
4. Natural Grammar and Conventional Words, from Aristotle to Pinker | p. 93
-
5. Natural Dialect and Artificial Language, from Varro to Chomsky | p. 141
-
6. Invisible Hierarchies, from Jakobson to Optimality Theory | p. 169
-
Afterword
-
Linguistics after Naturalism | p. 201
-
-
Index | p. 217
“[A] must-read for any serious linguist, let alone a linguistic historiographer. [The author's] mission is to challenge linguists to reflect on their own fundamental assumptions and to recognize that there is nothing much new under the sun — and in this he succeeds admirably. The whole is an enjoyable and thought-provoking read.”
Nicola McLelland, Trinity College, Dublin
Cited by
Cited by 21 other publications
No author info given
2012. Reviews.
Language & History 55:2 ► pp. 144 ff. 
No author info given
2021.
In A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 129],
Amsler, Mark E.
2010. Premodern Letters and Textual Consciousness.
Historiographia Linguistica 37:3 ► pp. 279 ff.
Ayres-Bennett, Wendy
2004.
In Sociolinguistic Variation in Seventeenth-Century France,
Cram, David
2020. Review of Joseph (2018): Language, Mind, and Body: A conceptual history.
Historiographia Linguistica 47:2-3 ► pp. 332 ff.
De Cuypere, Ludovic & Klaas Willems
2008. Meaning and Reference in Aristotle’s Concept of the Linguistic Sign.
Foundations of Science 13:3-4 ► pp. 307 ff.
Denecker, Tim, Gert Partoens, Pierre Swiggers & Toon Van Hal
2012. Language Origins, Language Diversity, and Language Classification in Early Christian Latin Authors.
Historiographia Linguistica 39:2-3 ► pp. 429 ff.
Goddard, Cliff
2009. The ‘Communication Concept’ and the ‘Language Concept’ in Everyday English.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Joseph, John E.
2000. The unconscious and the social in Saussure.
Historiographia Linguistica 27:2-3 ► pp. 307 ff.
Joseph, John E.
2012. Language Pedagogy and Political-Cognitive Autonomy in Mid-19th Century Geneva.
Historiographia Linguistica 39:2-3 ► pp. 259 ff.
Joseph, John E.
2015. Iconicity in Saussure’s Linguistic Work.
Historiographia Linguistica 42:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Joseph, John E.
2019. La norme et le naturel.
Histoire Epistémologie Langage 41:2 ► pp. 13 ff.
Joseph, John E. & Frederick J. Newmeyer
2012. ‘All Languages Are Equally Complex’.
Historiographia Linguistica 39:2-3 ► pp. 341 ff.
Kelly, Piers
2016. The origins of invented vocabulary in a utopian Philippine language.
Asia-Pacific Language Variation 2:1 ► pp. 82 ff.
McLelland, Nicola
2006. Letters, sounds and shapes: Reflections on the sounds of german in early modern linguistic awareness.
Transactions of the Philological Society 104:2 ► pp. 229 ff.
Meißner, David
2022. Reappraising Plato’s Cratylus
.
Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 0:0
Mühlhäusler, Peter & Adrian Peace
2006. Environmental Discourses.
Annual Review of Anthropology 35:1 ► pp. 457 ff.
Giuseppe Pezzini & Barnaby Taylor
2019.
In Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World,
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil
2016. Language and identity: national, ethnic, religious.
<i>WORD</i> 62:4 ► pp. 276 ff.
Wolff, Tristram
2016. Arbitrary, Natural, Other: J. G. Herder and Ideologies of Linguistic Will.
European Romantic Review 27:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Woolard, Kathryn A.
2020.
In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology,
► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
Philosophy
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General