200 Years of Syntax

A critical survey

| University of Verona
ISBN 9789027245878 (Eur) | EUR 140.00
ISBN 9781588110527 (USA) | USD 210.00
ISBN 9789027284570 | EUR 140.00 | USD 210.00
This book argues convincingly against the widespread opinion that very few syntactic studies were carried out before the 1950s. Relying on the detailed analysis of a large amount of original sources, it shows that syntactic matters were in fact carefully investigated throughout both the 19th century and during the first half of the 20th century. Moreover, it illustrates how the enormous development of syntactic research in the last fifty years has already condemned even several recent ideas and analyses to oblivion, and deeply influenced current research programs. The wealth of research undertaken over the last two centuries is presented here in a systematic way, taking as its starting point the relationship of syntax with psychology throughout this period. The critical ideas expressed in the text are based on a detailed illustration of the different syntactic models and analyses rather than on the polemics between the different schools.
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 98]  2001.  xiv, 551 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
Part I: The age of psychologism in linguistics
2. The rise and fall of ‘psychologistic’ syntax
3. “What is syntax?”
4. The analyses of the sentence and of the word groups
Part II: The age of structural linguistics
5. The role of syntax in the structuralist systems
6. Structuralist approaches to sentence analysis
7. The techniques of syntactic description
Part III: The age of syntactic theories
8. The shaping of syntactic theories
9. Different views of syntax
10. The ‘Chomskian program’
Index of names
Index of subjects
“A marvelous work, equally rich in factual detail and in interpretation of the historical record. I would unhesitatingly recommend it to anyone who desires to understand the tortuous development of syntactic theory in the past two centuries.”
“[...] an outstanding work by any standard according to which a broad historical overview might be judged, including (but not limited to) descriptive coverage, analysis, and insight. I have no doubt that it will remain the standard source on the history of syntactic theorizing for years to come.”
“This is [...] a pioneering work. No earlier work reconstructs the general area of syntax as it developed during these two centuries.”
“[...] highly educational for modern syntacticians, who may not be aware of the wealth and the scope of syntactic research which dates back to the 19th Century and before. [...] The real value of this book lies in its treatment of the larger issues in the history of syntactic theory and how they relate to our modern concerns.”
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  00069803
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Brattico, Pauli & Mikko Maatta
2009.  In Open Information Management,  pp. 158 ff. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-246-6.ch007
Elffers-van Ketel, Els
2014.  In History of Linguistics 2011 [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 123],  pp. 127 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.123.11elf
Graffi, Giorgio
2017. Harris, Chomsky and the origins of transformational grammar. Lingvisticae Investigationes 39:1  pp. 48 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.39.1.03gra
Hinzen, Wolfram
2012. Human Nature and Grammar. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 70  pp. 53 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246112000045
López Arroyo, Belén & Roda P. Roberts
2015. Unusual sentence structure in wine tasting notes: A contrastive corpus-based study. Languages in Contrast 15:2  pp. 162 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.15.2.01lop
Martin-Nielsen, Janet
2011. A forgotten social science? Creating a place for linguistics in the historical dialogue. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 47:2  pp. 147 ff. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20493
Mazziotta, Nicolas
2016. Drawing Syntax before Syntactic Trees. Historiographia Linguistica 43:3  pp. 301 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.43.3.03maz
Moro, Andrea
2017.  In The Companion to Syntax,  pp. 1 ff. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom044
Narita, Hiroki
2014.  In Endocentric Structuring of Projection-free Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 218], https://doi.org/10.1075/la.218
Oniga, Renato
2016. The Emergence of the Syntactic Concept of Phrase in Comenius. Historiographia Linguistica 43:3  pp. 285 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.43.3.02oni
Raynaud, Savina
2016.  In History of Linguistics 2014 [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 126],  pp. 163 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.126.13ray
Sgouros, Tom
2005. What Is Context For? Syntax in a Non-Abstract World. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14:2  pp. 235 ff. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-005-3926-z

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2018. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.