References

References

Aelbrecht, Lobke, Liliane Haegeman, and Rachel Nye
2012Main Clause Phenomena. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder
2007 “Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure.” Studies in Language 31(3): 569–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
2008Analyzing Linguistic Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Tanya K., and Lars Heltoft
2010 “Mood in Danish.” In Mood in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Björn Rothstein & Rolf Thieroff, 85–102. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Tanya Karoli
2007Hyperparadigmer – en undersøgelse af paradigmatiske samspil i danske modussystemer, Roskilde Universitetscenter.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2003Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels
1996 “Discourse particles in Danish.” In Content, Expression and Structure. Studies in Danish functional grammar, ed. by Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen, Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder, Lars Heltoft & Lisbeth Falster Jakobsen, 283–314. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diderichsen, Paul
1946Elementær Dansk Grammatik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Dines, Elizabeth R.
1980 “Variation in Discourse: ‘And Stuff like That’.” Language in Society 9(1): 13–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie, and Jennifer Hay
2012 “Exploiting random intercepts: Two case studies in sociophonetics.” Language Variation and Change 24(1): 59–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Thomas B.
2002The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2000From Cognitive Semantics to Lexical Pragmatics: The Functional Polysemy of Discourse Particles. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Frans
2009 “The data and design of the LANCHART study.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41: 3–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3, ed. by Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik, and Lars Heltoft
2011Grammatik over det Danske Sprog. København: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1997 “Adverbs in functional grammar.” In Toward a functional lexicology, ed. by Gerd Wotjak, 121–136. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline
2007 “Embedded root phenomena.” In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Vol. II, ed. by Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk, 174–209. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline, Antonella Sorace, and Zakaris Svabo Hansen
2010 “V-to-I and V2 in subordinate clauses: an investigation of Faroese in relation to Icelandic and Danish.” Journal of Comparative German Linguistics 13: 67–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B., and Sandra A. Thompson
1973 “On the applicability of root transformations.” Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465–497.Google Scholar
Jensen, Torben Juel, and Tanya Karoli Christensen
2013 “Promoting the demoted: The distribution and semantics of “main clause word order” in spoken Danish complement clauses.” Lingua 137: 38–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit
2007 “Embedded V2 in Norwegian and Swedish.” Working papers in scandinavian syntax 80: 103–161.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky
1971 “Fact.” In Semantics An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, ed. by Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krylova, Elvira
2005 “Epistemisk polyfoni i danske modalpartikler.” Sproglig polyfoni. Arbejdspapirer 4: 75–87.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
1999Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That. General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Inge Lise
1996 “'Der kan jo være nogen der kan itte tåle det' - Om hovedsætningsordstilling i bisætninger i danske dialekter.” In Studier i talesprogsvariation og sprogkontakt. Til Inger Ejskjær på halvfjerdsårsdagen den 20. maj 1996, ed. by Inger Ejskjær, Bent Jul Nielsen & Inge Lise Pedersen, 242–251. København: C. A. Reitzel.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Derek Denis
2010 “The stuff of change: General extenders in Toronto, Canada.” Journal of English Linguistics 38(2): 335–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and R. Harald Baayen
2012 “Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice.” Language Variation and Change 24(2): 135–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Therkelsen, Rita
2004 “Polyfoni som sproglig begrebsramme og som redskab i tekstanalysen.” Sproglig polyfoni. Arbejdspapirer I: 79–109.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
2002 ““Object complements” and conversation towards a realistic account.” Studies in Language 26: 125–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac
1991 “The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English.” Journal of Pragmatics 15(3): 237–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1995Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Voller, Inge
2002 “Die Modalpartikeln auf Deutsch und Dänisch - eine kontrastive Analyse.” Hermes 28: 135–154.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Kristine Bentzen, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson, and Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir
2009 “On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses.” Lingua 119: 1914–1938. CrossrefGoogle Scholar