Cover not available
Part of
Language Variation - European Perspectives V: Selected papers from the Seventh International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 7), Trondheim, June 2013
Edited by Eivind Torgersen, Stian Hårstad, Brit Mæhlum and Unn Røyneland
[Studies in Language Variation 17] 2015
► pp. 169–182

A new view of Basque through eighteenth-century correspondence

This contribution deals with a recently discovered Basque correspondence which poses new research questions. The letters, written in Labourdin dialect in 1757, provide insight into the practice of writing, depicting an unexpected panorama of literate women and semi-professional scribes. Because of their nature, these records attest to some linguistic features lacking in the printed tradition of Labourdin. The goal of this paper is to discuss the linguistic importance of these newly discovered letters and, in particular, to show how they change our understanding of the history of the language. To that end, I focus on differences between the language used in literary texts and private correspondence. As an example of this divergence between literary texts and personal letters, I analyze two epenthesis rules: the insertion of a [β] after u and the insertion of [ ʝ] after i.

Keywords: correspondence, epenthesis, Labourdin dialect, language history 'from below'
Published online: 9 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.17.13pad
References
Dossena, Marina
2012 “The study of correspondence. Theoretical and methodological issues”. In Dossena, Marina, and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds). 13–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dossena, Marina, and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti
(eds) 2012 Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan
2012a “The Use of Private Letters and Diaries in Sociolinguistic Investigation.” In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, ed. by Juan M. Hernández-Campoy, and Juan C. Conde-Silvestre, 156–169. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b “Between Linguistic Creativity and Formulaic Restriction. Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Nineteenth-Century Lower Class Writers’ Private Letters.” In Dossena, Marina, and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds), 45–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth, and Wim Vandenbussche
(eds) 2007 Germanic Language Histories ‘from Below’ (1700–2000). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosperrin, Bernard
1984 Les petites écoles sous l'Ancien Régime. Rennes: Ouest-France.Google Scholar
Hualde, José I., and Iñaki Gaminde
1997 “Vowel Interaction in Basque: A Nearly Exhaustive Catalogue.” International Journal of Basque Philology and Linguistics 31 (1): 211–245.Google Scholar
Hualde, José I., and Jon Ortiz de Urbina
2003 A Grammar of Basque. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamikiz, Xabier, Manuel Padilla-Moyano, and Charles Videgain
2014 Othoi çato etchera. Le Dauphin itsasontziko euskarazko gutunak (1757) - Correspondance basque du corsaire Le Dauphin (1757) [special issue of Lapurdum]. Bayonne: IKER UMR 5478 (CNRS).Google Scholar
Martineau, France, and Sandrine Tailleur
2010 “Correspondance familiale acadienne au tournant du XXe siècle: fenêtre sur l’évolution d’un dialecte.” In 2ème Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, ed. by Franck Neveu et al., 291–303. Paris: Institute de Linguistique Française.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael
1995 “The Linguistic Value of Ulster Emigrant Letters.” Ulster Folklife 41: 26–41.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
n.d). Corpora of Early English Correspondence. At [URL] (last accessed October 2013).
Oyharçabal, Bernard
2001 “Statut et évolution des lettres basques durant les XVIIème et XVIIIème siècles.” Lapurdum 6: 219–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padilla-Moyano, Manuel
2014 “ Le Dauphin itsasontziko gutuneria (1757) edo euskararen historia behetik ” [The Correspondence from the Ship Le Dauphin (1757) or the History of Basque ‘from Below’]. In Lamikiz, Xabier, Manuel Padilla, and Charles Videgain (eds).Google Scholar
Rijk, Rudolf de
1970 “Vowel Interaction in Biscayan Basque.” Fontes Linguae Vasconum: Studia et documenta 5: 149–168.Google Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert, and Marijke van der Wal
2013 “Epistolary Formulae and Writing Experience in Dutch Letters from the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” In van der Wal, Marijke, and Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 45–65.Google Scholar
Sarasola, Ibon
1976 Historia Social de la Literatura Vasca. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W
2002 “Investigating Variation and Change in Written Documents.” In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. by Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes, 67–96. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Staes, Jacques
1979–1992 “Lettres de soldats béarnaise de la Révolution et du Permier Empire.” Revue de Pau et de Béarn 7 (1979); 8 (1980); 9 (1981); 10 (1982); 11 (1983); 16 (1989) & 19 (1992).Google Scholar
Urgell, Blanca
2015(forthcoming). “Lehen euskara modernoa [First modern Basque].” In Euskararen historia [The History of Basque], ed. by Joaquín Gorrocahtegui, Iván Igartua, and Joseba Lakarra. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Basque Government.Google Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke
2007 “Eighteenth-Century Linguistic Variation from the Perspective of a Dutch Diary and a Collection of Private Letters.” In Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth, and Wim Vandenbussche (eds), 83–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke, and Gijsbert Rutten
(eds) 2013, Touching the Past. Studies in the Historical Sociolinguistics of the ego-documents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke, Gijsbert Rutten, and Tanja Simons
2012 “Letters as Loot. Confiscated Letters Filling Major Gaps in the History of Dutch.” In Dossena, Marina, and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds), 139–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar