Cover not available
Part of
Germanic Heritage Languages in North America: Acquisition, attrition and change
Edited by Janne Bondi Johannessen † and Joseph C. Salmons
[Studies in Language Variation 18] 2015
► pp. 97–116

Heritage Language Obstruent Phonetics and Phonology

American Norwegian and Norwegian-American English

| University of Wisconsin–Madison
ORCID logo | University of Wisconsin–Madison
This chapter explores the acoustics and phonology of speech sounds produced by Norwegian heritage speakers in the Upper Midwest in Norwegian and to a lesser extent in English. The study reports work on acoustic differences in obstruents spoken by heritage speakers whose L1 and L2 are both ‘aspiration’ languages, namely Norwegian and American English, but which differ phonologically in other ways. Our focus falls in particular on laryngeal features, that is, the realization of the distinction between ‘voiced’ and ‘voiceless’ or ‘lenis’ and ‘fortis’ consonants, along with the closely related issue of durational contrasts in Norwegian. Building on Allen and Salmons (2012), we argue that the Norwegian and English spoken by Norwegian-American bilinguals will each show influence from the other language, but asymmetrically.
Keywords: aspiration, duration, laryngeal phonetics, laryngeal phonology, passive voicing, sonorant devoicing
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 20 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.18.04all
References (51)
Allen, Brent. 2011. “Laryngeal Phonology in Norwegian: Sonorant Devoicing.” Manuscript. University of Wisconsin – Madison.
Allen, Brent and Joseph Salmons. 2012. “Obstruenters fonetikk og fonologi i amerikanorsk og norskamerikansk engelsk.” Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift [Norwegian Linguistics Journal] 30: 149–169.Google Scholar
Annear, L., E. Clare, A. Groh, T.C. Purnell, E. Raimy, M. Simonsen and J.C. Salmons. 2011. Why do English speakers neutralize VOICING finally? Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV), Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Avery, Peter and William Idsardi. 2001. “Laryngeal Dimensions, Completion and Enhancement.” In Distinctive Feature Theory, ed. by T. Alan Hall, 41–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill and Catherine Ringen. 2009. “A Typological Investigation of Evidence for [sg] in Fricatives.” Paper Presented at the Manchester Phonology Meeting.
Bradley, Travis G. 2002. “Gestural Timing and Derived Environment Effects in Norwegian Clusters.” In WCCFL 21 Proceedings, ed. by Line Mikkelsen and Christopher Potts, 43–56. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Morphological Derived-Environment Effects in Gestural Coordination: A Case Study of Norwegian Clusters.” Lingua 117: 950–985. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Matthew. 1970. “Vowel Length Variation as a Function of the Voicing of Consonant Environment.” Phonetica 22: 129–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckman, Fred R. and Gregory K. Iverson. Forthcoming. “Second Language Acquisition and Phonological Change.” In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, ed. by Patrick Honeybone and Joseph Salmons. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo
Endresen, Rolf Theil. 1989. Fonetikk: Ei elementær innføring. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Fintoft, Knut. 1961. “The Duration of Some Norwegian Speech Sounds.” Phonetica 7: 19–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E. 1987. “The Production of ‘New’ and ‘Similar’ Phones in a Foreign Language: Evidence for the Effect of Equivalence Classification.” Journal of Phonetics 15: 47–65.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1953. The Norwegian Language in America (2 vols.). Madison: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hjelde, Arnstein. 1992. Trøndsk talemål i Amerika. Trondheim: Tapir.Google Scholar
. This volume. “Changes in a Norwegian Dialect in America.”
Honeybone, Patrick. 2005. “Sharing Makes us Stronger: Process Inhibition and Segmental Structure.” In Headhood, Elements, Specification and Contrastivity, ed. by Philip Carr, Jacques Durand and Colin Ewen, 167–192. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Arthur S. and Grant Fairbanks. 1953. “The Influence of Consonant Environment Upon the Secondary Acoustical Characteristics of Vowels.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25: 105–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howell, Robert B. 1993. “German Immigration and the Development of Regional Variants of American English: Using Contact Theory to Discover Our Roots.” In The German Language in America, ed. by Joseph Salmons, 190–212. Madison: Max Kade Institute.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory and Joseph Salmons. 1995. “Aspiration and Laryngeal Representation in Germanic.” Phonology 12: 369–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Glottal Spreading Bias in Germanic.” Linguistische Berichte 178: 135–151.Google Scholar
. 2003a. “Laryngeal Enhancement in Early Germanic.” Phonology 20: 43–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003b. “Legacy Specification in the Laryngeal Phonology of Dutch.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 15(2): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “On the Typology of Final Laryngeal Neutralization: Evolutionary Phonology and Laryngeal Realism.” Theoretical Linguistics 32: 205–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Domains and Directionality in the Evolution of German Final Fortition.” Phonology 24: 121–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Germanic Aspiration: Phonetic Enhancement and Language Contact.” Sprachwissenschaft 33(3): 257–278.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Final Devoicing and Final Laryngeal Neutralization.” In Companion to Phonology Volume 3, ed. by Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Beth Hume and Keren Rice, 1622–1643. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi, Joel Priestley, Kristin Hagen, Tor Anders Åfarli and Øystein Alexander Vangsnes. 2009. “The Nordic Dialect Corpus — An Advanced Research Tool.” In Proceedings of the 17th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics NODALIDA 2009, NEALT Proceedings Series, Volume 4, ed. by Kristiina Jokinen and Eckhard Bick, online at [URL].Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi and Joseph Salmons (eds). 2012. Norsk i Amerika. Special issue of the Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift / Norwegian Linguistics Journal 2.Google Scholar
Keyser, Samuel Jay and Kenneth Stevens. 2006. “Enhancement and Overlap in the Speech Chain.” Language 82: 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristoffersen, Gjert. 2000. The Phonology of Norwegian. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 2011. “Phonemically Contrastive Fricatives in Old English?” English Language and Linguistics 15: 31–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moen, Per. 1988. “The English Pronunciation of Norwegian-Americans in Four Midwestern States.” American Studies in Scandinavia 20: 105–121.Google Scholar
. 1991. “The Influence of a Norwegian Substratum on the Pronunciation of Norwegian-Americans in the Upper Midwest.” In Norsk språk i Amerika – Norwegian Language in America, ed. by Botolv Helleland, 97–115. Olso: Novus.Google Scholar
. 2001. “The English of Norwegian Americans in the Upper Midwest with Special Reference to the Substratum Effect on Syntax and Idioms.” In Global Eurolinguistics: European Languages in North America – Migration, Maintenance and Death, ed. by Sture Ureland, 243–264. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi and Alexei Kochetov. 2011. “VOT Across the Generations: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Contact-Induced Change.” Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 6), Freiburg, Germany, June 29. [URL]
Nützel, Daniel and Joseph Salmons. 2011. “Language Contact and New Dialect Formation: Evidence from German in North America.” Language and Linguistics Compass 5: 705–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G.E. and Ilse Lehiste. 1960. “Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32: 693–703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piske, Thorsten, Ian R.A. MacKay and James E. Flege. 2001. “Factors Affecting Degree of Foreign Accent in an L2: A Review.” Journal of Phonetics 29: 191–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popperwell, R.G. 1963. The Pronunciation of Norwegian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Joseph Salmons, Dilara Tepeli and Jennifer Mercer. 2005. “Structured Heterogeneity and Change in Laryngeal Phonetics: Upper Midwestern Final Obstruents.” Journal of English Linguistics 33(4): 307–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringen, Catherine and Wim A. Van Dommelen. 2013. “Quantity and laryngeal contrasts in Norwegian.” Journal of Phonetics 41: 479–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Jason. 2009. “Understanding the Nature and Outcomes of Early Bilingualism: Romance Languages as Heritage Languages.” The International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2): 155–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simley, Anne. 1930. “A Study of Norwegian Dialect in Minnesota.” American Speech 5: 469–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N., Sheila E. Blumenstein, Laura Glicksman, Martha Burton, and Kathleen Kurowski. 1992. “Acoustic and Perceptual Characteristics of Voicing in Fricatives and Fricative Clusters.” Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 91: 2979–3000. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Coetsem, Frans. 1988. Loan Phonology and the Two Transfer Types in Language Contact. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. A General and Unified Theory of the Transmission Process in Language Contact. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Van Dommelen, Wim A. and Catherine Ringen. 2007. “Intervocalic Fortis and Lenis Stops in a Norwegian Dialect.” Proceedings Fonetik 2007, Stockholm, May 30-June 1, 2007. Speech, Music and Hearing, Quarterly Progress and Status Report, TMH-QPSR 50: 5–8.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert. 1998. “The Laryngeal Specifications of Fricatives.” Linguistic Inquiry 29: 497–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2005. “Contact-Induced Changes: Classification and Processes. Diachronica 22: 373–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Samuel A. and Stanley M. Sapon. 1958. “Note on Vowel Duration Seen Crosslinguistically.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 30: 152–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Petersen, Jan Heegård, Gert Foget Hansen & Jacob Thøgersen
2020. Correlations between linguistic change and linguistic performance among heritage speakers of Danish in Argentina. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10:5 ► pp. 690 ff. DOI logo
Putnam, Michael T., Tanja Kupisch & Diego Pascual y Cabo
2018. Chapter 12. Different situations, similar outcomes. In Bilingual Cognition and Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 54], ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Hjelde, Arnstein
2015. Changes in a Norwegian Dialect in America. In Germanic Heritage Languages in North America [Studies in Language Variation, 18], ► pp. 283 ff. DOI logo
Pierce, Marc, Hans C. Boas & Karen A. Roesch
2015. The History of Front Rounded Vowels in New Braunfels German. In Germanic Heritage Languages in North America [Studies in Language Variation, 18], ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Heritage Languages [Studies in Bilingualism, 58], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.