Chapter published in:
Acquiring Sociolinguistic Variation
Edited by Gunther De Vogelaer and Matthias Katerbow
[Studies in Language Variation 20] 2017
► pp. 1–41

Bridging the gap between language acquisition and sociolinguistics

Introduction to an interdisciplinary topic

| University of Münster
| Laboratoire LIDILEM – Université Grenoble Alpes
| Philipps-Universität Marburg
| Laboratoire LIDILEM – Université Grenoble Alpes
Despite repeated calls for in-depth research, the acquisition of patterns of sociolinguistic variation has long been an underinvestigated topic both in sociolinguistics and in language acquisition research. With the exception of a few exploratory studies, most notably Labov (1964), it has long been rare for sociolinguistic research to focus on non-adults, whereas most research on language acquisition tended to take place in a sociolinguistic vacuum (see, e.g. Mills 1985: 142 and Labov 1989: 96 for statements to this effect). Over the last few years, however, the situation seems to be changing. Two reasons may be given for this: first, and quite trivially perhaps, technical advancements are making it possible to gather, store and explore data in cheap and efficient ways, providing researchers with the necessary data to conduct empirically sound research on the topic. And second, parallel to a paradigm shift from rule-based to usage-based conceptions of grammar, linguistic variation has moved into the centre of the attention of theoretical linguistics. As a result, the acquisition of variation can now be considered an ‘emergent topic’ in research on language variation in general.The aim of this book is to offer a state-of-the-art of current research on the topic, thereby focusing on two particular objectives: (1) the acquisition of sociolinguistic variation presents itself as an interesting research topic for sociolinguists and psycholinguists working on acquisition, but also for a broad range of other sub-disciplines of linguistics, including historical linguistics, dialectology, and for researchers working in different theoretical frameworks. This book aims at bridging the gap between these disciplines and frameworks and allowing an interdisciplinary perspective on the topic; and (2) in order to enable cross-linguistic comparison, the book wants to bring together research carried out in different sociolinguistic constellations, as most obviously found in different language areas or different countries.
Keywords: language acquisition, psycholinguistics, language variation, sociolinguistics, cognition
Published online: 30 September 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.20.01dev
References

References

Allerup, Peter, Mogens Jansen, Henrik Löb, and Børge Prien
1979 Retstavning: Nogle første analyser af folkeskolens afgangsprøve i 1978: Vol. III: Nogle statistiske analyser. København: Danmarks Pædagogiske Institut.Google Scholar
Ambridge, Ben, and Lieven, Elena V.M.
2011 Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ammon, Ulrich
1989 “Aspects of Dialect and School in the Federal Republic of Germany.” In Dialect and Education: Some European Perspectives, ed. by Jenny Cheshire, Viv Edwards, Henk Münstermann, and Bert Weltens, 113–138. Clevedon, and Philadelphia: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Andler, Daniel
2006 “Sciences Cognitives. Encyclopædia Universalis.” Accessed October 11, 2016. http://​www​.universalis​.fr​/encyclopedie​/sciences​-cognitives/
Auer, Peter
2005 “Europe's Sociolinguistic Unity, or: A Typology of European Dialect/Standard Constellations.” In Perspectives on Variation: Sociolinguistic, Historical, Comparative, ed. by Nicole Delbecque, Johan van der Auwera, and Dirk Geeraerts, 7–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, and Frans Hinskens
2005 “The Role of Interpersonal Accommodation in a Theory of Language Change.” In Dialect Change: The Convergence and Divergence of Dialects in Contemporary Societies, ed. by Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens, and Paul Kerswill, 335–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbu, Stéphanie, Aurélie Nardy, Jean-Pierre Chevrot, and Jacques Juhel
2013 “Language Evaluation and Use during Early Childhood: Adhesion to Social Norms or Integration of Environmental Regularities?” Linguistics 51 (2): 381–411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beller, Sieghard, Andrea Bender, and Douglas L. Medin
2012 “Should Anthropology Be Part of Cognitive Science?” Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3): 342–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Basil
1971–1975 Class, Codes and Control: Volume 1–3. St. Albans: Paladin. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berthele, Raphael
2002 “Learning a Second Dialect. A Model of Idiolectal Dissonance.” : Multilingual 21 (4): 327–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne, Joel Winston, and Uta Frith
2004 “Social Cognitive Neuroscience: Where Are We Heading?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (5): 216–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blom, Jan-Petter, and John J. Gumperz
1972 “Social Meaning in Linguistic Structures: Code Switching in Northern Norway.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. by John J. Gumperz, and Dell Hymes, 407–434. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Ben Rampton
2011 “Language and Superdiversity.” Diversities 13 (2): 1–21.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
2004 “The Role of Peer Interaction in Later Pragmatic Development: The Case of Speech Representation.” In Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence, ed. by Ruth A. Berman, 191–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary
1999 “ ‘Why Be Normal?’ Language and Identity Practices in a Community of Nerd Girls.” Language in Society 28 (2): 203–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buson, Laurence
2009 Variation stylistique entre 5 et 11 ans et réseaux de socialisation scolaire: Usages, représentations, acquisition et prise en compte éducative. Ph.D. Dissertation University of Grenoble.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2001a “Frequency Effects on French Liaison.” In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, ed. by Joan L. Bybee, and Paul J. Hopper, 337–359. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001b Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition.” Language 82 (4): 711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., and Dan I. Slobin
1982 “Rules and Schemas in the Development and Use of the English Past Tense.” Language 58 (2): 265–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
2010 “New Directions in sociolinguistic cognition.” In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15 (2): 31–39.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K.
1988 “Acquisition of Phonological Variants.” In Methods in Dialectology: Proceedings of the 6. Internat. Conference Held at the Univ. College of North Wales, 3rd–7th August 1987, ed. by Alan Thomas, and Martin Ball, 650–665. Clevedon.Google Scholar
1992 “Dialect Acquisition.” Language 68 (4): 673–705. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and Its Social Significance. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Viv Edwards, Henk Münstermann, and Bert Weltens
1989 “Introduction.” In Dialect and Education: Some European Perspectives, ed. by Jenny Cheshire, Viv Edwards, Henk Münstermann, and Bert Weltens, 113–138. Clevedon, and Philadelphia: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Jacomine Nortier, and David Adger
2015 Emerging Multiethnolects in Europe. London: University of London.Google Scholar
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre
1994 “La variation phonétique: Un point de vue cognitif.” Langage et société 70 (1): 5–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Que reste-t-il de la distinction compétence-performance dans les théories fondées sur l’usage?” Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 22 (‘L’éventail des compétences linguistiques et la (dé)valorisation des performances’): 49–68.Google Scholar
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, Aurélie Nardy, and Stéphanie Barbu
2011 “Developmental Dynamics of SES-Related Differences in Children’s Production of Obligatory and Variable Phonological Alternations.” Language Sciences 33 (1): 180–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, Laurence Beaud, and Renata Varga
2001 “Developmental Data on a French Sociolinguistic Variable: The Word-Final Post-Consonantal /R/.” Language Variation and Change 12 (3): 295–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, and Paul Foulkes
2013 “Introduction: Language Acquisition and Sociolinguistic Variation.” Linguistics 51 (2): 251–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Lynn
2009 “Cognitive Sociolinguistics: A Viable Approach to Variation in Linguistic Theory.” Lacus Forum 33: 105–118.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael
2000 “Lingua Franca and Ethnolects in Europe and Beyond.” Sociolinguistica 14 (1): 83–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Roger L.
1975 “Divergent and Convergent Attitudes towards the Alsatian Dialect.” Anthropological Linguistics 17 (6): 293–304.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, Georg
1998 “Taal en onderwijs in Noord-Limburg in de Franse tijd (1794–1814).” Vereniging voor Limburgse Dialect- en Naamkunde 96: 3–30.Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie, and Aafke Hulk
2006 “External and Internal Factors in Bilingual and Bidialectal Language Development: Grammatical Gender of the Dutch Definite Determiner.” In L2 Acquisition and Creole Genesis: Dialogues, ed. by Claire Lefebvre, Lydia White, and Christine Jourdan, 355–378. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cremona, Cristiana, and Elizabeth Bates
1977 “The Development of Attitudes toward Dialect in Italian Children.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 6: 223–232.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2000 Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daan, Jo, Kas Deprez, Roeland van Hout, and Jan Stroop
1985 Onze veranderende taal. Utrecht: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Day, Richard R.
1980 “The Development of Linguistic Attitudes and Preferences.” TESOL Quarterly 14 (1): 27–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, Annick
2003 “Language Variation and Local Elements in Family Discourse.” Language Variation and Change 15 (3): 329–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Saussure, Ferdinand
1916 Cours de linguistique générale, ed. by Charles Bally, and Albert Sechehaye. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther, and Guido Seiler
2012 “The Dialect Laboratory: Introductory Remarks.” In The Dialect Lab: Using Dialects as a Testing Ground for Theories of Language Change, ed. by Gunther De Vogelaer, and Guido Seiler, 1–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther, and Jan Klom
2013 “Mikrovariation beim Erwerb des niederländischen Genussystems.” In Dialektologie in neuem Gewand: Zu Mikro-/Varietätenlinguistik, Sprachenvergleich und Universalgrammatik, ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss, 141–169. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Díaz-Campos, Manuel
2004 “Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Variables in Spanish: Do Children Acquire Individual Lexical Forms or Variable Rules.” In Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, ed. by Timothy L. Face, 221–236. Berlin, and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005 “The Emergence of Adult-like Command of Sociolinguistic Variables: A Study of Consonant Weakening in Spanish-Speaking Children.” In Selected Proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages, ed. by David Eddington, 56–65. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2012 “New Perspectives, Theories and Methods: Diachronic Change and Language Acquisition.” In Historical Linguistics of English: An International Handbook, ed. by Alexander Bergs, and Laurel Brinton, 1599–1613. Berlin, and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard J., and Paul Foulkes
2014 “An Evaluation of Usage-Based Approaches to the Modelling of Sociophonetic Variability.” Lingua 142: 42–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dorleijn, Margreet, Maarten Mous, and Jacomine Nortier
2015 “Urban Youth Speech in Kenya and the Netherlands.” In Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century: Linguistic Practices across Urban Spaces, ed. by Jacomine Nortier, and Bente A. Svendsen, 271–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
1989 Jocks and Burnouts: Social Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
1997 “Why Ethnography?” In Ungdomssprak i Norden, ed. by Ulla-Britt Kotsinas, Anna-Brita Stenstrom, and Anna-Malin Karlsson, 52–62. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
2004 “Adolescent Language.” In Language in the USA, ed. by Edward Finegan, and John R. Rickford, 361–374. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M.
1973 “The Structure of Communicative Choice.” In Language Acquisition and communicative choice, ed. by Susan M. Ervin-Tripp, and Anwar S. Dil, 302–373. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W.
1991 “The Quiet Demise of Variable Rules.” American Speech 66 (1): 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul
2010 “Exploring Social-Indexical Knowledge: A Long Past but a Short History.” Laboratory Phonology 1 (1): 5–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, and Gerard J. Docherty
2006 “The Social Life of Phonetics and Phonology.” Journal of Phonetics 34: 409–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Gerard J. Docherty, and Dominic J.L. Watt
2001 “The Emergence of Structured Variation.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 7.3 – A Selection of Papers from NWAV 29: 67–84.Google Scholar
2005 “Phonological Variation in Child Directed Speech.” Language 81 (1): 177–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Peter
2007 “Language attitudes.” In The Routledge Companion to Sociolinguistics, ed. by Carmen Llamas, Louise Mullany, and Peter Stockwell, 116–121. London, and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garrod, Simon, and Martin J. Pickering
2004 “Why is conversation so easy?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (1): 8–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
2003 “Cultural Models of Linguistic Standardization.” In Cognitive Models in Language and Thought: Ideology, Metaphors, and Meaning, ed. by René Dirven, Roselyn Frank, and Martin Pütz, 25–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geerts, Guido, Johan Nootens, and Jef van den Broeck
1978 “Flemish Attitudes towards Dialect and Standard Language: A Public Opinion Poll.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 15 (1): 33–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghimenton, Anna, Jean-Pierre Chevrot, and Jacqueline Billiez
2013 “Language Choice Adjustments in Child Production during Dyadic and Multiparty Interactions: A Quantitative Approach to Multilingual Interactions.” Linguistics 51 (2): 413–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giesbers, Herman
1989 Code-switching tussen dialect en standaardtaal. Amsterdam: P.J. Meertens-Instituut.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Richard Bourhis, Alan Lewis, and Peter Trudgill
1974 “The Imposed Norm Hypothesis: A Validation.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 60 (4): 405–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Yetla, and Kenneth Goodman
1981 “Twenty Questions about Teaching Language.” Educational Leadership 38: 437–443.Google Scholar
Gregoire, Henri-Baptiste
1794 Rapport sur la nécessité et les moyens d'anéantir les patois et d'universaliser la langue française. Paris.Google Scholar
Gülzow, Insa, and Natalia Gagarina
2011 Frequency Effects in Language Acquisition: Defining the Limits of Frequency as an Explanatory Concept. Berlin, and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Häcki Buhofer, Annelies, and Harald Burger
1998 Wie Deutschschweizer Kinder Hochdeutsch lernen: Der ungesteuerte Erwerb des gesprochenen Hochdeutschen durch Deutschschweizer Kinder zwischen sechs und acht Jahren. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris
1962 “Phonology in Generative Grammar.” Word 18: 54–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Alison
1995 Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting. Oxford, and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinskens, Frans, Peter Auer, and Paul Kerswill
2005 “The Study of Dialect Convergence and Divergence: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations.” In The Convergence and Divergence of Dialects in Contemporary Societies, ed. by Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens, and Paul Kerswill, 1–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, Brian
1989 “Education and the Vernacular.” In Dialect and Education: Some European Perspectives, ed. by Cheshire, Jenny, Viv Edwards, Henk Münstermann, and Bert Weltens, 293–302. Clevedon: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Hoyle, Susan M., and Carolyn T. Adger
1998 “Introduction.” In Kids Talk: Strategic Language Use in Later Childhood, ed. by Susan M. Hoyle, and Carolyn T. Adger, 3–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyams, Nina M.
1986 Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht et al.: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Hans
1943 Leben und Macht der Mundart in Niedersachsen. Oldenburg: Gerhard Stalling.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter E.
2013 “Bernstein’s ‘Codes’ and the Linguistics of ‘Deficit’.” Language and Education 27 (2): 161–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katerbow, Matthias
2013 Spracherwerb und Sprachvariation: Eine phonetisch-phonologische Analyse zum regionalen Erstspracherwerb im Moselfränkischen. Berlin, and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katerbow, Matthias, Lena Eichele, and Christina Kauschke
2011 “Einstellungen zu kindlicher Sprachvariation: Eine empirische Studie zur Fremdbewertung regionalsprachlicher und/oder störungsbedingter Variation von Kindern.” Linguistische Berichte 228: 467–484.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Laurence, and Fabrice Clément
2011 “L’esprit des sociétés. Bilan et perspectives en sociologie cognitive.” In La sociologie cognitive, ed. by Laurence Kaufmann, and Fabrice Clément, 7–40. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne, and Michael Barlow
2000 “Introduction: A Usage-Based Conception of Language.” In Usage-based Models of Language Use, ed. by Michael Barlow, and Suzanne Kemmer, VII–XXVIII. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne, and Michael Israel
1994 “Variation and the Usage-Based Model.” In Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Para-Session on Variation and Linguistic Theory: Vol. 2, ed. by Katherine Beals, Jeannette Denton, Robert Knippen, Lynette Melnar, Hisami Suzuki, and Erica Zeinfeld, 165–179. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Kern, Friederike, and Margret Selting
2011 Ethnic Styles in European Metropolitan Areas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul
1996 “Children, Adolescents, and Language Change.” Language Variation and Change 8 (2): 177–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Social Class.” In The Routledge Companion to Sociolinguistics, ed. by Carmen Llamas, Louise Mullany and Peter Stockwell, 51–61. London, and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, and Ann Williams
2000 “Creating a New Town Koine: Children and Language Change in Milton Keynes.” Language in Society 29 (1): 65–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kinzler, Katherine D., and Jasmine M. DeJesus
2013 “Northern = Smart and Southern = Nice: The Development of Accent Attitudes in the United States.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (6): 1146–1158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Gitte, and René Dirven
2008 Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore, and Jens Normann Jørgensen
2011 “Subjective Factors in Dialect Convergence and Divergence.” In Dialect Change: Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, ed. by Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens, and Paul Kerswill, 287–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kroon, Sjaak, and Ton Vallen
2009 “Discoursen over dialect en school.” In De klank van de stad: Stedelijke meertaligheid en interculturele communicatie, ed. by Jürgen Jaspers, 165–181. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1964 “Stages in the Acquisition of Standard English.” In Social Dialects and Language Learning, ed. by Roger W. Shuy, Alva Davis, Robert Hogan, 77–103. Champaign: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
1972a Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1972b Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1989 “The Child as Linguistic Historian.” Language Variation and Change 1 (1): 85–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Transmission and Diffusion.” Language 83 (2): 344–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “What Is to Be Learned? The Community as the Focus of Social Cognition.” In Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Social and Cultural Variation in Cognition and Language Use, ed. by Martin Pütz, Justyna A. Robinson, and Monika Reif, 23–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lacoste, Véronique, and Lisa Green
2016 “Child Language Variation: Sociolinguistic and Formal Approaches.” Linguistic Variation 16: 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lafontaine, Dominique
1986 Le Parti Pris des Mots. Bruxelles: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Laks, Bernard
2013 “Why is There Variation Rather than Nothing?” Language Sciences 39: 31–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2012 “The Original Sin of Cognitive Science.” Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3): 396–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1999 The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Loudermilk, Brandon C.
2013 “Psycholinguistic Approaches.” In The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Robert Bayley, Richard Cameron, and Ceil Lucas, 132–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K.S.
1977 Language, Social Class, and Education: A Glasgow Study. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Makoni, Sinfree, and Alastair Pennycook
2007 “Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages.” In Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages, ed. by Sinfree Makoni, and Alastair Pennycook, 1–41. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Martin, Nathaël
2005 Réseaux sociaux et variations phonétiques. Grenoble: Université Stendhal Master 1 dissertation.Google Scholar
Martin, Nathaël, Jean-Pierre Chevrot, and Stéphanie Barbu
2010 “Stylistic Variations in the Social Network of a 10-Year-Old Child: Pragmatic Adjustments or Automatic Alignment?” Journal of Sociolinguistics 14 (5): 678–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martino, Josephine
1982 “The Phoneme /θ/ and Its Alternative Realization as /f/: A Study of Variation in Australian English among Primary School Boys, According to Socio-Economic Background.” Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 39–42.Google Scholar
Mattheier, Klaus J.
1980 Pragmatik und Soziologie der Dialekte: Einführung in die kommunikative Dialektologie des Deutschen. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
Mills, Anne E.
1985 “The Acquisition of German.” In: The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, ed. by Dan I. Slobin, 141–254. Hillsdals: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1986 The Acquisition of Gender. A Study of English and German. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molénat, Xavier
2012 “Les sociologues à l’assaut de l’esprit.” Sciences humaines 233 (1): 14–14.Google Scholar
Møller, Janus Spindler, and Jens Normann Jørgensen
2009 “From Language to Languaging: Changing Relations between Humans and Linguistic Features.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41: 143–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, David L., and Michael L. Schwalbe
1990 “Mind and Self in Society: Linking Social Structure and Social Cognition.” Social Psychology Quarterly 3 (2): 148–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munson, Benjamin
2010 “Levels of Phonological Abstraction and Knowledge of Socially Motivated Speech-Sound Variation.” Laboratory Phonology 1 (1): 157–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nardy, Aurélie
2008 Acquisition des variables sociolinguistiques entre 2 et 6 ans: facteurs sociologiques et influences des interactions au sein du réseau social. Grenoble: Université Stendhal Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Nardy, Aurélie, Jean-Pierre Chevrot, and Stéphanie Barbu
2013 “The Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Variation: Looking Back and thinking Ahead.” Linguistics 51 (2): 255–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Sociolinguistic Convergence and Social Interactions within a Group of Preschoolers: A Longitudinal Study.” Language Variation and Change 26 (3): 273–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ostermai, Guido
2000 Sprachvariation im Grenzbereich: Eine Untersuchung zur Standardsprache nordwestschweizerischer und südbadischer PrimarschülerInnen. Aarau: Sauerländer.Google Scholar
Patterson, Janet Lee
1992 The Development of Sociolinguistic Phonological Variation Patterns for (ing) in Young Children. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1886 Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Payne, Arvilla
1976 The Acquisition of the Phonological System of a Second Dialect. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet
2001 “Stochastic Phonology.” GLOT 5 (6): 1–13.Google Scholar
2002 “Word-Specific Phonetics.” In Laboratory Phonology: Vol. VII, ed. by Carlos Gussenhoven, and Natasha Warner, 101–139. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology.” Language and Speech 46 (2–3): 115–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “The Next Toolkit.” Journal of Phonetics 34 (6): 516–530. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven
1999 Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, Lauren Zentz, and Nathalie Dion
2012 “Phrase-Final Prepositions in Quebec French: An Empirical Study of Contact, Code-Switching and Resistance to Convergence.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15 (2): 203–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quéré, Louis
2008 “How Could Trust be Restored to Nature?” Intellectica 46–47: 105–122.Google Scholar
Reid, Euan
1978 “Social and Stylistic Variation in the Speech of Children: Some Evidence from Edinburgh.” In Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English, ed. by Peter Trudgill, 158–171. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie
1994 Acquisition of Variable Rules: (-t,d) Deletion and (ing) Production in Preschool Children. Philadelphia: Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
1997 “Acquisition of Variable Rules: A study of (-t, d) Deletion in Preschool Children.” Journal of Child Language 24 (2): 351–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodina, Yulia, and Marit Westergaard
2013 “The Acquisition of Gender and Declension Class in a Non-Transparent System: Monolinguals and Bilinguals.” Studia Linguistica 67 (1): 47–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1984 The Language of Children and Adolescents: The Acquisition of Communicative Competence. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Peter
1989 “Dialect and Education in West Germany.” In Dialect and Education: Some European Perspectives, ed. by Jenny Cheshire, Viv Edwards, Henk Münstermann, and Bert Weltens, 62–93. Clevedon, and Philadelphia: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Rys, Kathy
2007 Dialect as a Second Language: Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Factors in Secondary Dialect Acquisition by Children and Adolescents. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ghent University.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, and Hélène Blondeau
2007 “Longitudinal Change across the Lifespan: R in Montreal French.” Language 83 (3): 560–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schulte Kemminghausen, Karl
1939 Mundart und Hochsprache in Norddeutschland. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz Verlag.Google Scholar
Schultze, Fritz
1880 “Die Sprache des Kindes: Eine Anregung zur Erforschung des Gegenstandes.” Darwinistische Schriften 10: 1–46.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff
2010 Second Dialect Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Mercedes Durham, and Liane Fortune
2007 ““Mam, My Trousers is Fa’in Doon!”: Community, Caregiver, and Child in the Acquisition of Variation in a Scottish Dialect.” Language Variation and Change 19 (1): 63–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Mercedes Durham, and Hazel M. Richards
2013 “The social and linguistic in the acquisition of sociolinguistic variation.” Linguistics 51 (2): 258–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Squires, Lauren
2013 “It Don’t Go Both Ways: Limited Bidirectionality in Sociolinguistic Perception.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 17 (2): 200–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Otto
1988 “Divergence and Convergence of Dialect and Standard from the Perspective of the Language Learner. Standard Language Acquisition by the Swiss-German Dialect Speaking Child.” In Variation and Convergence: Studies in Social Dialectology, ed. by Peter Auer, and Aldo Di Luzio, 134–156. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tesink, Cathelijne, Karl-Magnus Petersson, Jos Van Berkum, Danielle Van den Brink, Jan Buitelaar, and Peter Hagoort
2009 “Unification of Speaker and Meaning in Language Comprehension: An fMRI Study.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21 (11): 2085–2099. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003 Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1986 Dialects in contact. Oxford, and New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Valian Virginia, and Andrea Levitt
1996 Prosody and Adults’ Learning of Syntactic Structure. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 497–516. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkum, Jos, Danielle Van den Brink, Cathelijne Tesink, Miriam Kos, and Peter Hagoort
2008 “The Neural Integration of Speaker and Message.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 (4): 580–591. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, Marilyn M.
1980 “Sound Change and Child Language.” In Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott, Rebecca La Brum, and Susan Shepherd, 303–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Weijnen, Antoon
1967 “Sociodialectologische onderzoekingen in Limburg.” In ‘Taalsociologie’: Bijdragen en Mededelingen der Dialectencommissie van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, ed. by Jo Daan, and Antoon Weijnen, 16–27. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandse Uitgeversmaatschappij.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin Herzog
1968 “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change.” Directions for Historical Linguistics, ed. by Winfried Lehmann, and Yakov Malkiel, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit R.
2004 “The Interaction of Input and UG in the Acquisition of Verb Movement in a Dialect of Norwegian.” Nordlyd 32: 110–134.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike
2013 “What Can New Urban Dialects Tell Us about Internal Language Dynamics? The Power of Language Diversity.” In Dialektologie in neuem Gewand: Zu Mikro-/Varietätenlinguistik, Sprachenvergleich und Universalgrammatik, ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss, 207–245. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Wilson, John, and Alison Henry
1998 “Parameter Setting within a Socially Realistic Linguistics.” Language in Society 27: 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Charles
2000 “Internal and External Forces in Language Change.” Language Variation and Change 12: 231–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Three Factors in Language Variation.” Lingua 120: 1160–1177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Ghyselen, Anne-Sophie & Gunther De Vogelaer
2018. Seeking Systematicity in Variation: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations on the “Variety” Concept. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo
Zenner, Eline, Laura Rosseel & Dirk Speelman
2020. Starman or Sterrenman: An acquisitional perspective on the social meaning of English in Flanders. International Journal of Bilingualism ► pp. 136700692096081 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.