Chapter published in:
Acquiring Sociolinguistic Variation
Edited by Gunther De Vogelaer and Matthias Katerbow
[Studies in Language Variation 20] 2017
► pp. 235–265

Language acquisition in bilectal environments

Competing motivations, metalinguistic awareness, and the Socio-Syntax of Development Hypothesis

| University of Cyprus, Cyprus Acquisition Team
| Cyprus Acquisition Team, University of Cyprus
The linguistic reality of Cyprus is diglossic between the local variety of Cypriot Greek and the official language Standard Modern Greek. One of the better studied differences between the two varieties is clitic placement in syntactic environments where one requires enclisis and the other proclisis. This paper discusses the findings of two studies on the acquisition of object clitics so as to (i) explore the connection between bidialectalism and metalinguistic awareness and (ii) argue that competing motivations are relevant for the linguistic development in diglossic environments. Framed as the Socio-Syntax of Development Hypothesis, the process of constructing a socio-syntactic repertoire captures competing motivations by assuming that the linguistic development of Greek Cypriot children primarily involves the need to resolve linguistic accommodation and adjust to the “high” variety.
Keywords: acquisition, bi-, comparative bilingualism, diglossia, metalinguistic awareness, socio-syntax
Published online: 30 September 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.20.09lei
References

References

Agathocleous, Marina, Alexandra Charalambous, Elena Papadopoulou, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann
2014 “The Role of the Social Environment on Linguistic Development: A View from Cypriot Greek Clitic Placement.” In Developments in the Acquisition of Clitics, ed. by Kleanthes K. Grohmann, and Theoni Neokleous, 41–86. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Agouraki, Yioryia
1997 “On the Enclisis/Proclisis Alternation.” In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Greek Linguistics: Vol. II, ed. by Gaberell Drachman, Ageliki Malikouti-Drachman, John Fykias, and Celia Klidi, 393–404. Salzburg: University of Salzburg.Google Scholar
Antoniou, Kyriakos, Kleanthes K. Grohmann, Maria Kambanaros, and Napoleon Katsos
2016 “The Effect of Childhood Bilectalism and Multilingualism on Executive Control.” Cognition 149: 18–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia
2002 “The Maintenance of Diglossia in Cyprus and the Emergence of Cypriot Standard Greek.” Ms., University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
2006 “Linguistic Practices in Cyprus and the Emergence of Cypriot Standard Greek.” San Diego Linguistic Papers 2, 1–24. [Reprinted in Mediterranean Language Review 17, 15–45 2010.]Google Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar
2000 “Clitics: A Window into the Null Subject Property.” In New Comparative Studies, ed. by João Costa, 31–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth, and Brian MacWhinney
1987 “Competition, Variation, and Language Learning.” In Mechanisms of Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Carnegie-Mellon Conference on Cognition, ed. by Brian MacWhinney, 157–193. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A.
1985 “The Acquisition of Hebrew.” In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition: The Data: Vol. I, ed. by Daan Isaac Slobin, 255–371. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen
1991 Language Processing in Bilingual Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, and Karen P. Corrigan
2011 ““Judge not Lest Ye Be Judged”: Exploring Methods for the Collection of Socio-Syntactic Data.” In Language Variation – European Perspectives III: Selected Papers from the 5th International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, ed. by Frans Gregersen, Jeffrey K. Parrott, and Pia Quist, 149–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Michal Starke
1999 “The Typology of Structural Deficiency: A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns.” In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, ed by Henk C. van Riemsdijk, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carroll, David W.
2008 The Psychology of Language. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Cazden, Courtney B.
1976 “Play with Language and Metalinguistic Awareness: One Dimension of Language Experience.” In Play: Its Role in Development and Evolution, ed. by Jerome S. Bruner, Allison Jolly, and Kathy Sylva, 603–608. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Chatzikyriakidis, Stergios
2010 Clitics in Four Dialects of Modern Greek: A Dynamic Account. PhD dissertation King’s College London.zGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie, and Corrigan, Karen P.
2005 “Toward an Integrated Approach to Syntactic Variation: A Retrospective and Prospective Synopsis.” In Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social, ed. by Leonie Cornips, and Karen P. Corrigan, 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
COST Action A33
2006–10 Cross-Linguistically Robust Stages of Children’s Linguistic Performance with Applications to the Diagnosis of Specific Language Impairment: European Research Network. Brussels: COST Office.Google Scholar
Davy, Jim, Yannis Ioannou, and Anna Panayotou
1996 “French and English Loans in Cypriot diglossia.” Travaux de la Maison de l’Orient Méditerranéen 25 (1): 127–136.Google Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther, and Jolien Toye
this volume). “Acquiring Attitudes towards Varieties of Dutch: A Quantitative Perspective.”
Delpit, Lisa
1995 Other People’s Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John. A.
1985 “Competing Motivations.” In Iconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24–6, 1983, ed. by John Haiman, 343–366. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenchlas, Susana Alicia
2003 “Clitics in child Spanish.” First Language 23 (2): 193–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A.
1959 “Diglossia.” Word 15, 325–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Janet Dean, and Stephen Crain
1987 “Simplicity and Generality of Rules in Language Acquisition.” In Mechanisms of Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Carnegie-Mellon Conference on Cognition, ed. by Brian MacWhinney, 35–63. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
2011 “Some Directions for the Systematic Investigation of the Acquisition of Cypriot Greek: A New Perspective on Production Abilities from Object Clitic Placement.” In The Development of Grammar: Language Acquisition and Diachronic Change, ed. by Esther Rinke, and Tanja Kupisch, 179–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014a “CAT Research on Object Clitic Placement: Where We Are Now.” In Developments in the Acquisition of Clitics, ed. by Kleanthes K. Grohmann, and Theonie Neokleous, 1–40. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2014b “Towards Comparative Bilingualism.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4 (3): 336–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K., and Maria Kambanaros
2016 “The Gradience of Multilingualism in Typical and Impaired Language Development: Positioning Bilectalism within Comparative bilingualism.” Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences 7: 37, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K., and Evelina Leivada
2012 “Interface Ingredients of Dialect Design: Bi-x, Socio-Syntax of Development, and the Grammar of Cypriot Greek.” In Towards a Biolinguistic Understanding of Grammar, ed. by Anna-Maria Di Sciullo, 239–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K., Eleni Theodorou, Natalie Pavlou, Evelina Leivada, Elena Papadopoulou, and Silvia Martínez-Ferreiro
2012 The Development of Object Clitic Placement in Cypriot Greek and the Romance Connection. In Selected Proceedings of the Romance Turn IV Workshop on the Acquisition of Romance Languages, ed. by Sandrine Ferré, Philippe Prévost, Laurie Tuller, and Rasha Zebib, 128–152. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Raphiq, Zohar Eviatar, and Judith Aharon Peretz
2007 “Metalinguistic Awareness and Reading Performance: A Cross Language Comparison.” Journal of Psycholinguist Research 36 (4): 297–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidou, Elena
2007 “This Ain’t My Real Language, Miss: The use of the Cypriot dialect and Standard Modern Greek in a typical classroom interaction.” In Sociolinguistic and Pedagogical Dimensions of Dialects in Education, ed. by Andreas Papapavlou, and Pavlos Pavlou, 165–193. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Jessner, Ulrike
2005 “Multilingual Metalanguage, or the Way Multilinguals Talk about Their Languages.” Language Awareness 14 (1): 56–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karpava, Sviatlana, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann
2014 “Bilingual Acquisition of Cypriot Greek Object Clitic Placement.” In Developments in the Acquisition of Clitics, ed. by Kleanthes K. Grohmann, and Theoni Neokleous, 87–137. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Kolitsis, Andreas M.
1988 “The Present Day Cypriot Dialect.” In The History of the Greek Language in Cyprus: Proceedings of an International Symposium, ed. by Jacqueline Karageorghis, Oliver Masson, and Hidryma Pieride, 215–222. Larnaca: Piérides Foundation.Google Scholar
Leivada, Evelina, Maria Kambanaros, Loukia Taxitari, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann
to appear). “(Meta)linguistic Abilities of Bilectal Educators: The Case of Cyprus.” International Journal of Bilingualism and Bilingual Education.
Leivada, Evelina, Elena Papadopoulou, Maria Kambanaros, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann
2017 The Influence of Bilectalism and Non-Standardization on the Perception of Native Grammatical Variants. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences 8: 205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leivada, Evelina, Paraskevi Mavroudi, and Anna Epistithiou
2010 “Metalanguage or Bidialectism? Acquisition of Clitic Placement by Hellenic Greeks, Greek Cypriots and Binationals in the Diglossic Context of Cyprus.” In Proceedings of ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics 2010, ed. by Antonis Botinis, 97–100. Athens: ISCA and the University of Athens.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Erich Heinz
1967 Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Loukaidou, Marina
2004 Διαλεκτικά στοιχεία σε μαθητικά γραπτά: Η περίπτωση ενός περιφερειακού δημοτικού σχολείου της Κύπρου [Dialectal elements in student texts: The case of a rural primary school in Cyprus]. BA thesis, University of the Aegean, Rhodes.Google Scholar
Marinis, Theodore
2000 “The Acquisition of Clitic Objects in Modern Greek: Single Clitics, Clitic Doubling, Clitic Left Dislocation.” ZAS Papers in Linguistics 15, 260–283.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Barry
1984 Second Language Acquisition in Childhood: Preschool Children: Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M.
1994 “Code-Switching in Young Bilingual Children: The Acquisition of Grammatical Constraints.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16 (4): 413–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neokleous, Theoni
2013 The L1 Acquisition of Clitic Placement in Cypriot Greek. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Fredereick J.
2000 Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004 “Formal and Functional Motivation for Language Change.” In Motives for Language Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 18–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Brian
1972 Cypriot Greek: Its Phonology and Inflections. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papapavlou, Andreas, and Theklia Kouridou
2007 “Bidialectism and Metalinguistic Awareness.” In Sociolinguistic and Pedagogical Dimensions of Dialects in Education, ed. by Andreas Papapavlou, and Pavlos Pavlou, 216–235. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Pappas, Panayotis
2006 “Object Clitic Placement in the Dialects of Medieval Greek.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory (Mytilene, Greece, 30 September – 3 October 2004), ed. by Mark Janse, Brian D. Joseph, and Angela Ralli, 314–328. Patras: University of Patras.Google Scholar
Petinou, Kakia, and Arhonto Terzi
2002 “Clitic Misplacement among Normally Developing Children and Children with Specific Language Impairment and the Status of Infl Heads.” Language Acquisition 10 (1), 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Revithiadou, Anthi, and Vassilios Spyropoulos
2008 “Greek Object Clitic Pronouns: A Typological Survey of Their Grammatical Properties.” STUF – Language Typology and Universals 61 (1): 39–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, Charley, and Kleanthes K.
2013 “Discrete Bilectalism: Towards Co-Overt Prestige and Diglossic Shift in Cyprus.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 224, 119–142.Google Scholar
Rowe, Charley, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann
2014 “Canaries in a Coal Mine: Native Speakerhood and Other Factors as Predictors of Moribundity, Death, and Diglossic Shift in Cypriot Greek.” Mediterranean Language Review 21: 121–142.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, Roberta
2006 “The Acquisition of Object Clitics in Italian: Data from an Elicited Production Task.” Annali Online di Ferrara – Lettere 2: 31–42.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2004 “The Cypriot Koiné: A Recent Development?” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Crete, September 18–21, 2003, ed. by Georgis Catsimali, Alexis Kalokairinos, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Ionna Kappa. Rethymno: Linguistics Lab e-Book. [http://​www​.philology​.uoc​.gr​/conferences​/6thICGL]
Terzi, Arhonto
1999a “Clitic Combinations, Their Hosts and Their Ordering.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17 (1): 85–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999b “Cypriot Greek Clitics and Their Positioning Restrictions.” In Studies in Greek Syntax, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Geoffrey Horrocks, and Melita Stavrou, 227–240. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Theodorou, Eleni
2013 Specific Language Impairment in Cypriot Greek: Diagnostic and Experimental Investigations. PhD dissertation University of Cyprus Nicosia.Google Scholar
Theodorou, Eleni, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann
(2015) “Object Clitics in Cypriot Greek Children with SLI.” Lingua 161: 144–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsakali, Vina, and Wexler Kenneth
2004 “Why Children Omit Clitics in Some Languages but Not in Others: New Evidence from Greek.” In Proceedings of GALA 2003: Vol II., ed. by Jacqueline van Kampen, and Sergio Baauw, 493–504. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria
2014 “Early, Late or Very Late? Timing Acquisition and Bilingualism.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4 (3): 283–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsiplakou, Stavroula
2007 “Switching and Mixing within and outside of a Dialect Continuum: The Case of Greek-Speaking Cyprus.” Polydromo. [http://​www​.polydromo​.gr​/Yliko​_epistimoniko2​.asp]
2009 “Language Alternation, Competing Grammars and Interlanguage: Another Facet of the Cyprus Problem.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, ed. by Georgios Giannakis, Mary Baltazani, George Xydopoulos, and Tasos Tsangalidis, 1195–1209. Ioannina: University of Ioannina. [http://​www​.linguist‐uoi​.gr​/cd​_web​/docs​/greek​/044​_ Tsiplakou​.icgl8​.pdf]
2014 “Does Convergence Generate Stability? The Case of the Cypriot Greek Koiné.” In Stability and Divergence in Language Contact: Factors and Mechanisms, ed. by Kurt Braunmüller, Steffen Höder, and Karoline Kühl, 163–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tsiplakou, Stavroula, Andreas Papapavlou, Pavlos Pavlou, and Marianna Katsoyannou
2006 “Levelling, Koineization and Their Implications for Bidialectism.” In Language Variation: European Perspectives: Selected Papers from the Third International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 3), Amsterdam, June 2005, ed. by Frans Hinskens, 265–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tzakosta, Marina
2004 Multiple Parallel Grammars in the Acquisition of Stress in Greek L1. PhD dissertation Leiden University.Google Scholar
Varlokosta, Spyridoula, Adriana Belletti, João Costa, Naama Friedmann, Anna Gavarró, Kleanthes K. Grohmann, Maria Teresa Guasti., et al.
2016 “A Cross-Linguistic Study of the Acquisition of Pronoun and Clitic Production.” Language Acquisition 23: 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varlokosta, Spyridoula, Katerina Konstantzou, and Michaela Nerantzini
2014 “On the Production of Direct Object Clitics in Greek Typical Development and Specific Language Impairment: The Effect of Task Selection.” In Developments in the Acquisition of Clitics, ed. by Kleanthes K. Grohmann, and Theoni Neokleous, 188–211. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Von der Gabelentz, Georg
1891 Die Sprachwissenschaft: Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Weigel.Google Scholar
Yiakoumetti, Androula, Michael Evans, and Edith Esch
2005 “Language Awareness in a Bidialectal Setting: The Oral Performance and Language Attitudes of Urban and Rural Students in Cyprus.” Language Awareness 14 (4): 254–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Grohmann, Kleanthes K., Elena Papadopoulou & Charalambos Themistocleous
2017. Acquiring Clitic Placement in Bilectal Settings: Interactions between Social Factors. Frontiers in Communication 2 Crossref logo
Leivada, Evelina, Roberta D’Alessandro & Kleanthes K. Grohmann
2019. Eliciting Big Data From Small, Young, or Non-standard Languages: 10 Experimental Challenges. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Leivada, Evelina, Maria Kambanaros, Loukia Taxitari & Kleanthes K. Grohmann
2020. (Meta)linguistic abilities of bilectal educators: the case of Cyprus. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23:8 ► pp. 1003 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.