Cover not available
Part of
Processes of Change: Studies in Late Modern and Present-Day English
Edited by Sandra Jansen and Lucia Siebers
[Studies in Language Variation 21] 2019
► pp. 115–138

Chapter 7
Early immigrant English

Midwestern English before the dust settled

We explore the development of final obstruent neutralization (German Bad ‘bath’: /ba:d/ = [ba:t]) and other features of an emerging Wisconsin English variety that has been shaped by contact, while considering multiple factors such as input, contact, and influence from other varieties. We draw our data from immigrant letters and supplement these with what is known about education and language guides available to early immigrants, as well as contact with other language varieties and dialects. Through time and over remarkably heterogeneous varieties of English and German, we trace the presence of this feature in German and English, where it has been transformed.
Keywords: sound change, language variation, immigrant languages, final obstruent neutralization, new dialect formation, koineization, imposition
Article outline
  • 0.Introduction
  • 1.Context
  • 2.The twisted path of one innovation and the possible role of education
  • 3.The broader picture: English dialect features in immigrant letters
    • 3.1The Asbach letters
    • 3.2Sophia Goth’s English letter: Excerpts
    • 3.3Fred Volkmann English letter: Excerpts
  • 4.Feature analysis
    • 4.1Transitional nonnative features
    • 4.2Enduring but less directly structural features
    • 4.3Ambiguous features
    • 4.4Possible dialectal American English-origin patterns
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.21.07lit
References (50)
References
Ahn, Franz Heinrich. 1923. Ahn’s neuer amerikanischer Dolmetscher für Deutsche zum Erlernen der englischen Sprache ohne Lehrer: Anleitung zur Aussprache des Englischen. Kurgefasste Grammatik nebst leichten Beispielen Gespräche, Wörtersammlungen, Inserate und Zeitungartikel, Schriftlicher Verkehr usw. (New American Interpreter). New York, NY: Steiger. (Originally published 1920.)Google Scholar
Allen, Harold. 1973–79. The linguistic atlas of the Upper Midwest. 3 volumes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Avery, Peter & William J. Idsardi. 2001. Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement. In T. Allen Hall (ed.), Distinctive feature theory, 41–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, Angela & Mike Olson. 2006a. ‘I got my knife yet’: German imposition on Wisconsin English. Paper presented at the Germanic linguistics annual conference , University of Illinois, April.
. 2006b. Languages in contact: Uncovering the sources of German imposition on Wisconsin English. Paper presented at the German language and immigration in International Perspective Conference . University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Bagwell, Angela, Samantha Litty & Mike Olson. (Forthcoming). Wisconsin immigrant letters: German transfer to Wisconsin English. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Keeping in touch. Familiar letters across the English-speaking world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Benor, Sarah Bunin. 2015. How synagogues became shuls. In Janne Bondi Johannessen & Joseph C. Salmons (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 217–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, Frederic G. & Joan Houston Hall (eds). 1985–2017. The dictionary of American regional English. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Curme, George O. 1922. A grammar of the German language, designed for a thoro and practical study of the language as spoken and written to-day. 2nd edition. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Davies, Winifried V. & Nils Langer. 2006. The making of bad language. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Delahanty, Jennifer. 2011. Changes in Wisconsin English over 110 Years: A real-time acoustic account. PhD thesis: University of Wisconsin – Madison.Google Scholar
Eichhoff, Jürgen. 1971. German in Wisconsin. In Glenn Gilbert (ed.), The German language in America: A symposium, 41–57. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan. 2005. Sprachgeschichte von unten: Untersuchungen zum geschriebenen Alltagsdeutsch im 19. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frazer, Timothy C. 2006. Grammar. In Richard Sisson, Christian Zacher & Andrew Clayton (eds.), The American midwest: An interpretative encyclopedia, 291–294. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Frey, Benjamin E. 2013. Toward a general theory of language shift: A case study in Wisconsin German and North Carolina Cherokee. PhD thesis: University of Wisconsin – Madison.Google Scholar
Geiger, Steven R. and Joseph C. Salmons. 2006. Reconstructing variation at shallow time depths: The historical phonetics of 19th-century German dialects in the U.S. In Thomas Cravens (ed.), Variation and reconstruction, 37–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2004. Introduction. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Legacies of colonial English: Studies in transported dialects, 1–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. Language contact: Reconsideration and reassessment. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 1–28. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howell, Robert B. 1993. German immigration and the development of regional variants of American English: Using contact theory to discover our roots. In Joseph Salmons (ed.), The German language in America, 190–212. Madison: Max Kade Institute.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. and Joseph C. Salmons. 1995. Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic. Phonology 12. 369–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansen, Kjell. 1962. A vocabulary study of Gillespie and Kendall counties, Texas. MA thesis: University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul 2002. Koineization and accommodation. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 669–702. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2008. Mysteries of the substrate. In Miriam Meyerhoff and Naomi Nagy (eds.), Social lives in language–sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities: celebrating the work of gillian sankoff, 315–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina. 1997. English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Litty, Samantha. 2014. Variation in English VOT in three southern Wisconsin counties. Poster presented at The Mid-Continental phonetics and phonology Conference (MidPhon). University of Wisconsin-Madison.
. 2015. Variation in word final obstruent neutralization in Wisconsin English. Paper presented at the sixth annual workshop on immigrant languages in the Americas (WILA6). Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
. 2017. We talk German now yet: The sociolinguistic development of voice onset time and final obstruent neutralization in Wisconsin German and English varieties, 1863–2013. PhD thesis: University of Wisconsin – Madison.Google Scholar
Lockwood, William Burley. 1968. Historical German syntax. Volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Petty, Antje. 2013. Immigrant languages and education: Wisconsin’s German schools. In Thomas Purnell, Eric Raimy, and Joseph Salmons (eds.), Wisconsin talk: linguistic diversity in the badger state, 37–57. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas. 2008. Prevelar raising and phonetic conditioning: The role of labial and anterior tongue gestures. American Speech 83 (4). 373–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Dilara Tepeli, and Joseph Salmons. 2005a. German substrate effects in Wisconsin English: Evidence for final fortition. American Speech 80. 135–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Joseph Salmons, Dilara Tepeli, and Jennifer Mercer. 2005b. Structured heterogeneity and change in laryngeal phonetics: Upper Midwestern final obstruents. Journal of English linguistics 33 (4). 307–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Eric Raimy, and Joseph Salmons (eds.). 2013. Wisconsin talk: Linguistic diversity in the badger state. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Mary. 2006. Language, place and identity in later life. PhD thesis: Stanford.Google Scholar
Salmons, Joseph. 2017. Keineswegs Feinde der englischen Sprache: Deutsch, Englisch und Schulpolitik in Wisconsin. In Muttersprache. Zur Soziolinguistik regionaler Mehrsprachigkeit im deutschsprachigen Raum (Special issue ed. by Nils Langer) (4). 310–323.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Laryngeal phonetics, phonology, assimilation and final neutralization. In Richard Page & Michael T. Putnam (ed.), Cambridge handbook of germanic linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salmons, Joseph, Dilara Tepeli & Thomas Purnell. 2006. Deutsche Spuren im amerikanischen Englischen? Auslautverhärtung in Wisconsin. In Nina Berend and Elisabeth Knipf-Komlósi (eds.), Sprachinselwelten / The world of language islands, 205–225. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Salmons, Joseph and Thomas Purnell. forthcoming. Language contact and the development of American English. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sawyer, Janet B. 1959. Aloofness from Spanish influence in Texas English. Word 15. 270–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seifert, Lester W. J. 1993. The development and survival of the German language in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. In Joseph Salmons (ed.), The German language in America, 1683–1991, 322–337. Madison, Wis.: Max Kade Institute for German-American Studies.Google Scholar
Schirmunski, Viktor. 1962. Deutsche Mundartkunde. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Tepeli, Dilara, Joseph Salmons & Thomas Purnell. 2007. Was bleibt bestehen? Der deutsche Einfluß auf das Amerikanische.” In Josef Raab and Jan Wirrer (ed.), Die deutsche präsenz in den USA / The German presence in the U.S.A., 595–613. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
van Coetsem, Frans. 2000. A general and unified theory of the transmission process in language contact. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
van Dalen, Carl. 1879. Brieflicher Sprach- und Sprech-Unterricht für das Selbststudium Erwachsener: Englisch. Berlin: Langenscheidtsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, Miranda & Joseph Salmons. 2008. Good old immigrants of yesteryear who didn’t learn English: Evidence from Germans in Wisconsin. American Speech 83 (3). 259–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Linguistic marginalities: Becoming American without learning English. Journal of Transnational American Studies 4 (2). [URL].Google Scholar
Wilkerson, Miranda, Mark Livengood & Joseph Salmons. 2014. The socio-historical context of imposition in substrate effects. Journal of English linguistics 42 (4). 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Joseph B. 1980. The English spoken by German Americans in central Texas. In Paul Schach (ed.), Languages in conflict, 157–173. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 2001. Counting chad. Paper presented at the Stanford SemFest. (Handout available at [URL].)Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Litty, Samantha
2024. Chapter 10. Language dominance across the lifespan in Wisconsin German and English varieties. In Lifespan Acquisition and Language Change [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 14], ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Salmons, Joseph & Miranda E. Wilkerson
2019. English in German-Speaking Wisconsin and the Aftermath. In English in the German-Speaking World, ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.