Chapter 13
Borders and language
We expect to find dialect differences dispersed along a geographic continuum, under normal circumstances.
That is, unless some contingency disrupts the geography, we expect to find only minor differences in the speech of one
community and the communities on either side. The differences proliferate as distance increases, so that dialect
differences are greater in communities further away. This pattern of dispersion is known as a dialect continuum (Chambers and Trudgill 1998: 5–7). It is a model that has not aroused much
critical scrutiny presumably because it follows from the common-sense observation that people tend to speak more like
their neighbors than people further away. The most rigorous examination of the concept, the dialectometric analysis of
a chain of Dutch villages by Heeringa and Nerbonne (2001), corroborated the
main tenets of the model.
Article outline
- 1.Continua and dis-continua
- 2.Borders interrupted and continuous
- 3.Borders as bastions
- 4.When is the border permeable?
- 5.Fences and neighbors
-
References
References (9)
References
Burnett, Wendy. 2006. Linguistic resistance on the Maine-New Brunswick border.”
Canadian English in a global context. Special issue of Canadian Journal of
Linguistics 51. 161–175.
Chambers, J. K. 1995. The Canada-U.S. border as a vanishing isogloss: The case of
Chesterfield.” Journal of English Linguistics 23. 155–166.
Chambers, J. K. 2007. Geolinguistic patterns in a vast speech community. In Wladyslaw Cichocki, Wendy Burnett & Louise Beaulieu, (eds.), Modern dialect studies.
Proceedings of Methods XII. Special Issue of Linguistica
Atlantica. 27–36.
Chambers, J. K. 2013. English in Canada. In Tometro Hopkins (ed.), World Englishes. Volume 2.
North America
, 7–41. London/New York: Bloomsbury.
Chambers, J. K. 2018. Cracking the code: Wedgies and linguistic respectability. In Betsy E. Evans, Erica Benson & James Stanford (eds.), Language regard: Methods, variation and change, 239–248. Cambridge University Press.
Chambers, J. K. & Peter Trudgill. 1998. Dialectology. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, Thomas J. 1994. Dictionary recognition of developing forms: The case of snuck. In Greta D. Little & Michael Montgomery (eds.), Centennial usage studies, 144–154. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Gordon, Matthew J. 2013. Investigating chain shifts and mergers.” In J. K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edition, 203–219. Oxford/Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heeringa, Wilbert & John Nerbonne. 2001. Dialect areas and dialect continua. Language Variation and Change 13. 375–400.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Sullivan, Lisa
2024.
Production of pre-velar /æ/-raising in Colorado and Ontario.
American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.