Cover not available
Part of
Intermediate Language Varieties: Koinai and regional standards in Europe
Edited by Massimo Cerruti and Stavroula Tsiplakou
[Studies in Language Variation 24] 2020
► pp. 1–29

Chapter 1
Koinai and regional standard varieties in Europe

An introduction

| University of Turin
| Open University of Cyprus
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The language space between base dialects and standard
  • 3.The emergence of new standard varieties
  • 4.The dynamics of koineisation
  • 5.Vertical continua and the coherence of intermediate forms
  • 6.The papers in this volume
    • 6.1From North to South
    • 6.2An overall view
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 22 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.24.01cer
References (79)
References
Ammon, U. (2003). On the social forces that determine what is standard in a language and on conditions of successful implementation. Sociolinguistica, 17, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, P. (1997). Co-occurrence restrictions between linguistic variables. A case for social dialectology, phonological theory and variation studies. In F. Hinskens, R. Van Hout, & W. L. Wetzels (Eds.), Variation, change and phonological theory (pp. 69–100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (1998). Dialect levelling and the standard varieties in Europe. Special issue of Folia Linguistica, 32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect-standard constellations. In N. Delbecque, J. van der Auwera, & D. Geeraerts (Eds.), Perspectives on variation. Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative (pp. 7–42). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Dialect vs. standard: A typology of scenarios in Europe. In B. Kortmann, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe (The World of Linguistics 1), 485–500. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). The neo-standard of Italy and elsewhere in Europe. In M. Cerruti, C. Crocco, & S. Marzo (Eds.), Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian (pp. 365–374). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, P., & Hinskens, F. (1996). The convergence and divergence of dialects in Europe. New and not so new developments in an old area. Sociolinguistica, 10, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change. In P. Auer, F. Hinskens, & P. Kerswill (Eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages (pp. 335–357). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, P., Hinskens, F., & Kerswill, P. (Eds.) (2005) Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, P., Hinskens, F., & Mattheier, K. (Eds.) (1996). Convergence and divergence of dialects in Europe. Special issue of Sociolinguistica, 10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellmann, G. (1998). Between base dialect and standard language. Folia Linguistica, 32, 23–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berruto, G. (1989). On the typology of linguistic repertoires. In U. Ammon (Ed.), Status and function of languages and language varieties (pp. 552–569). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Dialect-standard convergence, mixing, and models of
 language contact: The case of Italy. In P. Auer, F. Hinskens, & P. Kerswill (Eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages (pp. 81–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). The languages and dialects of Italy. In W. Ayres-Bennett, & J. Carruthers (Eds.), Manual of Romance sociolinguistics (pp. 494–525). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanchet, P., & Armstrong, N. (2006). The sociolinguistic situation of ‘contemporary dialects of French’ in France today: An overview of recent contributions on the dialectalisation of Standard French. Journal of French Language Study, 6(3), 251–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Britain, D. (2009). One foot in the grave? Dialect death, dialect contact, and dialect birth in England. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 196/197, 121–155.Google Scholar
Britain, D., Vandekerckhove, R., & Jongenburger, W. (Eds.) (2009). Dialect death in Europe? Special issue of International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 196/197.Google Scholar
Cerruti, M., & Regis, R. (2014). Standardization patterns and dialect-standard convergence: A northwestern Italian perspective. Language in Society, 43(1), 83–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L., & Corrigan, C. (2005). Convergence and divergence in grammar. In P. Auer, F. Hinskens, & P. Kerswill (Eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages (pp. 96–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N., & Kristiansen, T. (2011). SLICE: Critical perspectives on language (de)standardization. In T. Kristiansen, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 11–35). Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory. Communication, context, and consequences. In Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation (pp. 1–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, F., & Pharao, N. (2016). Lects are perceptually invariant, productively variable: A coherent claim about Danish lects. In F. Hinskens, & G. R. Guy (Eds.), Coherence, covariation and bricolage: Various approaches to the systematicity of language variation. Special issue of Lingua, 172/173, 26–44.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, S., & van Hout, R. (2011). The standard language situation in the Low Countries: Top-down and bottom-up variations on a diaglossic theme. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 23(3), 199–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, G. R. (2013). The cognitive coherence of sociolects: How do speakers handle multiple sociolinguistic variables? Journal of Pragmatics, 52, 63–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, G. R., & Hinskens, F. (2016). Linguistic coherence; systems, repertoires and speech communities. In F. Hinskens, & G. R. Guy (Eds.), Coherence, covariation and bricolage: Various approaches to the systematicity of language variation. Special issue of Lingua, 172/173, 1–9.Google Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, J. M., & Villena-Ponsoda, J. A. (2009). Standardness and non-standardness in Spain: Dialect attrition and revitalization of regional dialects of Spanish. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 196–197, 181–214.Google Scholar
Hinskens, F. (1996). Dialect levelling in Limburg. Structural and sociolinguistic aspects. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hinskens, F., P. Auer, & P. Kerswill. (2005). The study of dialect convergence and divergence: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In P. Auer, F. Hinskens, & P. Kerswill (Eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages (pp. 1–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinskens, F., & Heeringa, W. J. (2015). Dialect change and its consequences for the Dutch dialect landscape: How much is due to the standard variety and how much is not?. Journal of Linguistic Geography, 3(1), 20–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinskens, F., van Meel, L., & van Hout, R. (2016). Co-variation and varieties in modern Dutch ethnolects. In F. Hinskens, & G. R. Guy (Eds.), Coherence, covariation and bricolage: Various approaches to the systematicity of language variation. Special issue of Lingua, 172–173, 72–86.Google Scholar
Hornsby, D. (2009). Dedialectalization in France: convergence and divergence. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 196–197, 157–180.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. T., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language (pp. 35–83). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1992). Analogy. In W. Bright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, vol. 1 (pp. 56–61). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. (2011). Dialect enregisterment in performance. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(5), 657–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Southern speech with a northern accent: Performance norms in an imitation. American Speech, 93(3–4): 497–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, B., Andrus, J., & Danielson, A. (2006). Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese.” Journal of English Linguistics, 34(2), 77–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, P. (2002). Koineization and accommodation. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 669–702). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2003). Dialect levelling and geographical diffusion in British English. In D. Britain, & J. Cheshire (Eds.), Social dialectology: In honour of Peter Trudgill (pp. 223–243). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Migration and language. In K. Mattheier, U. Ammon, & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik. An international handbook of the science of language and society, 2nd edn., vol 3 (pp. 2271–2285). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010). Contact and new varieties. In R. Hickey (Ed.), The handbook of language contact (pp. 230–251). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Koineisation. In J. K. Chambers, & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 2nd edn. (pp. 519–536). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, P., & Trudgill, P. (2005). The birth of new dialects. In P. Auer, F. Hinskens, & P. Kerswill (Eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages (pp. 196–220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, P., & Williams, A. (2000). Creating a new town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society, 29(1), 65–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). New towns and koineisation: Linguistic and social correlates. Linguistics, 43(5), 1023–1048. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kloss, H. (1978). Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, T. (2001). Two standards: one for the media and one for the school. Language Awareness, 10(1), 9–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, T., & Coupland, N. (Eds.) (2011). Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, T., & Grondelaers, S. (Eds.) (2013). Language (de)standardisation in late modern Europe: Experimental studies. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Kühl, K., & Braunmüller, K. (2014). Linguistic stability and divergence. An extended perspective on language contact. In K. Braunmüller, S. Höder, & K. Kühl (Eds.), Stability and Divergence in Language Contact: Factors and Mechanisms (pp. 13–38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mackridge, P. (2009). Language and national identity in Greece 1766–1976. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, M. A., Fort, M. R., & Arnal, M. L. (1995). Estudio sociolingüístico de la Franja Oriental de Aragón. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Mattheier, K. J. (1996). Varietätenkonvergenz. Überlegungen zu einem Bausteineiner Theorie der Sprachvariation. In P. Auer, F. Hinskens, & K. J. Mattheier (Eds.), Convergence and divergence of dialects in Europe (Sociolinguistica 10), 31–52.Google Scholar
(1997). Über Destandardisierung, Umstandardisierung und Standardisierung in modernen europäischen Standardsprachen. In K. J. Mattheier, & E. Radtke (Eds.), Standardisierung und Destandardisierung europäischer Nationalsprachen (pp. 1–11). Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Røyneland, U. (2009). Dialects in Norway: catching up with the rest of Europe?. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 196/197, 7–31.Google Scholar
Sandøy, H. (2002). Nordic language history and current trends in dialectology. In O. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. H. Jahr, A. Karker, H. P. Naumann, U. Telemann, L. Elmevik, & G. Widmark (Eds.), The Nordic languages. An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages, vol. I (pp. 304–312). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2011). Language culture in Norway: A tradition of questioning standard language norms. In T. Kristiansen, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 119–126). Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Schiffman, H. F. (1998). Standardization or restandardization: The case for ‘Standard’ Spoken Tamil. Language in Society, 27, 359–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schirmunski, V. M. (1930). Sprachgeschichte und Siedelungsmundarten. Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift, 18, H. 3/4, 113–122; H. 5/6, 171–188.Google Scholar
Siegel, J. (1985). Koines and koineization. Language in Society, 14, 357–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987). Language contact in a plantation environment. A sociolinguistic history of Fiji. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical orders and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23, 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stoeckle, P., & Svenstrup, C. H. (2011). Language variation and (de-)standardisation processes in Germany. In T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 83–90). Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Taeldeman, J. (2005). The influence of urban centres on the spatial diffusion of dialect phenomena. In P. Auer, F. Hinskens, & P. Kerswill (Eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages (pp. 263–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Linguistic stability in a language space. In P. Auer, & J. E. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 1 (pp. 355–374). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2002). Sociolinguistic variation and change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(2004). New-dialect formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. J., Gordon, E., Lewis, G., & Maclagan, M. (2000). Determinism in new-dialect formation and the genesis of New Zealand English. Journal of Linguistics, 36, 299–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsiplakou, S. (2014a). How ‘mixed’ is a mixed system? The case of the Cypriot Greek koiné. In K. Κ. Grohmann (Ed.), Three factors and beyond. Socio-syntax and language acquisition. Special issue of Linguistic Variation 14(1), 161–178.Google Scholar
(2014b). Does convergence generate stability? The case of the Cypriot Greek koiné. In K. Braunmuller, S. Höder, & K. Kühl (Eds.), Stability and divergence in language contact. Factors and mechanisms (pp. 165–177). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2017). Imperfect acquisition of a related variety? Residual clefting and what it reveals about (gradient) bilectalism. Frontiers in Communication 2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsiplakou, S. & Armostis, S. (2017). Do dialect variants (mis)behave? Evidence from the Cypriot Greek koine. In T. Georgakopoulos, T.-S. Pavlidou, M. Pechlivanos, A. Alexiadou, J. Androutsopoulos, A. Kalokairinos, S. Skopeteas, & K. Stathi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, vol. 2 (pp. 1065–1076). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Tsiplakou, S., Armostis, S., & Evripidou, D. (2016). Coherence ‘in the mix’? Coherence in the face of language shift in Cypriot Greek. In F. Hinskens, & G. R. Guy (Eds.), Coherence, covariation and bricolage: Various approaches to the systematicity of language variation. Special issue of Lingua, 172–173, 10–25.Google Scholar
Tsiplakou, S., Papapavlou, A., Pavlou, P. & Katsoyannou, M. (2006). Levelling, koineization and their implications for bidialectism. In F. Hinskens (Ed.), Language variation – European perspectives. Selected papers from the Third International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 3), University of Amsterdam, 23–25 June 2005 (pp. 265–276). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuten, D. (2001). Modeling koineization. In L. J. Brinton (Ed.), Historical Linguistics 1999: Selected papers from the 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver, 9–13 August 1999 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 215] (pp. 325–336). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Koineization in Medieval Spanish. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Villena-Ponsoda, J. A., & Vida-Castro, M. (2017). Between local and standard varieties. Horizontal and vertical convergence and divergence of dialect in Southern Spain. In I. Buchstaller, & B. Siebenhaar (Eds.), Language Variation – European Perspectives VI. Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 8), Leipzig, May 2015 (pp. 125–140). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiese, H., & Rehbein, I. (2016). Coherence in new urban dialects: A case study. In F. Hinskens, & G. R. Guy (Eds.), Coherence, covariation and bricolage: Various approaches to the systematicity of language variation. Special issue of Lingua, 172–173, 45–61.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

De Pascale, Stefano & Stefania Marzo
2023. Lexical coherence in contemporary Italian: a lectometric analysis. Sociolinguistica 37:1 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Tsiplakou, Stavroula
2023. Conflictual translanguaging in the linguistic landscape of a divided city. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.