Cover not available
Part of
Urban Matters: Current approaches in variationist sociolinguistics
Edited by Arne Ziegler, Stefanie Edler and Georg Oberdorfer
[Studies in Language Variation 27] 2021
► pp. 9–26

The sociolinguistic city

ORCID logo | Carnegie Mellon University
What might we learn if sociolinguists’ objects of study were cities rather than speech communities within cities? Drawing on urban sociology, I suggest that we think of a city as a site of encounter among different sociolinguistic worlds. This would force us to confront heterogeneity, to ask how and when disparate linguistic resources, language ideologies, and communicative practices bump up against each other and impinge on each other. We would have to consider urban mobilities and their sociolinguistic consequences. We would also need to rethink how sociolinguistic practices circulate in non-face-to-face contexts, asking about the role of material artifacts in this process. I illustrate each of these points with examples from my and others’ research.
Keywords: cities, urban studies, heterogeneity, encounter, mobility, circulation, Pittsburgh, Sydney, migration, sociolinguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cities as sites of encounter
    • 2.1Heterogeneity and sociolinguistic encounter
    • 2.2City mobilities and urban encounters
    • 2.3Circulation in the city: How change spreads
  • 3.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 16 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.27.01joh
References (43)
References
Beal, Joan C. 2009. Enregisterment, commodification, and historical context. “Geordie” versus “Sheffieldish”. American Speech 84(2). 138–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bodnar, John E., Roger Simon, and Michael P. Weber. 1983. Lives of their own: Blacks, Italians, and Poles in Pittsburgh, 1900–1960. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Byington, Margaret F. 1974. Homestead. The households of a mill town. Pittsburgh, PA/London: University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carnegie Corporation of New York. 2013. How do you pronounce “Carnegie?” [URL]. (26 May, 2019.)
Cheshire, Jenny et al. 2011. Contact, the feature pool and the speech community. The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(2). 151–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberhardt, Maeve. 2008. The low-back merger in the Steel City. African American English in Pittsburgh. American Speech 83(3). 284–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009a. Identities and local speech in Pittsburgh. A study of regional African American English. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh dissertation, Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2009b. The sociolinguistics of ethnicity in Pittsburgh. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(6). 1443–1454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Enregisterment of Pittsburghese and the local African American community. Language & Communication 32(4). 358–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice (Language in Society 27). Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hamnett, Chris. 2003. Gentrification, postindustrialism, and industrial and occupational restructuring in global cities. In Gary Bridge and Sophie Watson (eds.), A companion to the city, 331–341. Malden, MA et al.: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Barbara. 1998. Finding a place in Sydney. Migrants and language change. In Peter Trudgill and Jenny Cheshire (eds.), The sociolinguistics reader, vol. 2: Multilingualism and variation, 90–102. Abingdon/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2009. Pittsburghese shirts. Commodification and the enregisterment of an urban dialect. American Speech 84(2). 157–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Speaking Pittsburghese. The story of a dialect. Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Jennifer Andrus and Andrew E. Danielson. 2006. Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”. Journal of English Linguistics 34(2). 77–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara and Dan Baumgardt. 2004. “Pittsburghese” online. Vernacular norming in conversation. American Speech 79(2). 115–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Neeta Bhasin and Denise Wittkofski. 2002. “Dahntahn Pittsburgh”. Monophthongal /aw/ and representations of localness in southwestern Pennsylvania. American Speech 77(2). 148–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara and Scott F. Kiesling. 2008. Indexicality and experience. Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1). 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara and Calvin Pollak. 2016. Mobilities, materialities, and the changing meanings of Pittsburgh speech. Journal of English Linguistics 44(3). 254–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara et al. 2015. Pittsburgh speech and Pittsburghese (DOE 11). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karp, David A., Gregory P. Stone and William C. Yoels. 1991. Being urban. A sociology of city life, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kelly, Marjorie. 2003. Projecting an image and expressing identity. T-shirts in Hawaii. Fashion Theory 7(2). 191–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 1972. Language in the inner city. Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors (Language in Society 29). Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mac Giolla Chriost, Diarmait. 2007. Language and the city. Basingstoke/New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCool, Sam. 1982. Sam McCool’s new Pittsburghese. How to speak like a Pittsburgher. Pittsburgh, PA: Hayford Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James and Lesley Milroy. 1985. Linguistic change, social network, and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21(2). 339–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Language and social networks, 2nd edn. (Language in Society 2). Oxford/New York, NY: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Thomas D. 2010. “A Latino community takes hold”. Reproducing semiotic landscapes in media discourse. In Crispin Thurlow and Adam Jaworski (eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space, 168–186. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1996. The founder principle in creole genesis. Diachronica 13(1). 83–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Robert E. 1925. The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the urban environment. In Robert E. Park, Ernest W. Burgess, and Roderick D. McKenzie (eds), The city, 1–46. Chicago: Univeristy of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1926. The urban community as a spatial pattern and a moral order. In Ernest W. Burgess (ed.), The urban community, 3–18. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. 2002. Brown tide rising. Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary American public discourse. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In John A. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive language. Reported speech and metapragmatics, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1950. The metropolis and mental life. in Kurt E. Wolff, ed., The Sociology of Georg Simmel, 409–424. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Smakman, Dick and Patrick Heinrich (eds.). 2018. Urban sociolinguistics. The city as a linguistic process and experience. Abingdon/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Symes, Colin. 1987. Keeping abreast with the times. Towards an iconography of t-shirts. Studies in Popular Culture 12(1). 87–100.Google Scholar
Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1887. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Abhandlung des Communismus und des Socialismus als empirischer Culturformen. Leipzig: Fues.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wirth, Louis. 1938. Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology 44: 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zackal, Juarin. 2014. 7 things you need to kow about the Pittsburgh marathon. Pittsburgh Magazine. [URL]. (3 May, 2015.)
Zorbaugh, Harvey W. 1929. The Gold Coast and the slum. A sociological study of Chicago’s Near North Side. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

D'Onofrio, Annette & Jaime Benheim
2020. Contextualizing reversal: Local dynamics of the Northern Cities Shift in a Chicago community. Journal of Sociolinguistics 24:4 ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.