Cover not available
Part of
Urban Matters: Current approaches in variationist sociolinguistics
Edited by Arne Ziegler, Stefanie Edler and Georg Oberdorfer
[Studies in Language Variation 27] 2021
► pp. 203–226

Diminutives and their variation in spoken interaction in urban areas

The Austrian case

ORCID logo | University of Graz
| Philipps University of Marburg
| University of Graz
In order to understand the linguistic dynamics within urban language use, all linguistic levels have to be considered in empirical analyses. This paper addresses the morphological level, analysing the use of diminutives in Vienna and Graz and their surroundings. In Austria, diminutives cover a wide range of suffixes, where certain forms correlate with different degrees of formality and can tendentially be linked to diverging levels on the scale between dialect and standard. By analysing data from two corpora, the paper investigates tendencies of dialect levelling and potential differences between the two urban areas. The results point to the significance not only of the examined parameter place of residence, but also of age and gender when it comes to identifying motors of linguistic change and dialect levelling.
Keywords: diminutives, dialect levelling, variation and language change, age, gender, place of residence, dialect and standard
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Linguistic situation
  • 3.Diminutive suffixes and research questions
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Corpora and analytical procedure
    • 4.2Informants
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Multivariate analyses of individual diminutive suffixes
    • 5.2Diatopic view: Vienna and Graz and their surroundings
    • 5.3Diastratic view: Distribution by gender
    • 5.4Diastratic view: Distribution by age
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 16 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.27.09zie
References (53)
References
Ammon, Ulrich, Hans Bickel and Alexandra N. Lenz (eds.). 2016. Variantenwörterbuch des Deutschen. Die Standardsprache in Österreich, der Schweiz, Deutschland, Liechtenstein, Luxemburg, Ostbelgien und Südtirol sowie Rumänien, Namibia und Mennonitensiedlungen. 2nd edn. Berlin/Boston, MA: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Bridget L. 2002. Dialect leveling and /ai/ monophthongization among African American Detroiters. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(1). 86–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bahlo, Nils and Stefanie Krain. 2018. Indexing social age. Multimodale Begrüßungsroutinen Postadoleszenter als Index alternierender Lebensphasen. In Eva Neuland, Benjamin Könning and Elisa Wessels (eds.), Jugendliche im Gespräch. Forschungskonzepte, Methoden und Anwendungsfelder aus der Werkstatt der empirischen Sprachforschung (Sprache – Kommunikation – Kultur 22), 127–149. Berlin et al.: Lang.Google Scholar
Britain, David. 2002. Space and spatial diffusion. In Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 603–637. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bülow, Lars, Ann K. Fischer and Kristina Herbert (eds.). 2019. Dimensions of linguistic space. Variation – Multilingualism – Conceptualisations (Schriften zur deutschen Sprache in Österreich 45). Berlin et al.: Lang.Google Scholar
Bülow, Lars and Andrea Kleene. 2019. Lexical variation in the Austro-German border region. In Lars Bülow, Ann K. Fischer and Kristina Herbert (eds.), Dimensions of linguistic space. Variation – Multilingualism – Conceptualisations (Schriften zur deutschen Sprache in Österreich 45), 61–85. Berlin et al.: Lang.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill and Ann Williams. 2005. Phonology, grammar, and discourse in dialect convergence. In Auer, Peter, Frans Hinskens and Paul Kerswill (eds.), Dialect change. Convergence and divergence in European languages, 135–167. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1994. Diminutivbildung als nicht-prototypische Wortbildungsregel. In Klaus-Michael Köpcke (ed.), Funktionale Untersuchungen zur deutschen Nominal- und Verbalmorphologie. (Linguistische Arbeiten 319). Reprint 2017, 131–148. Berlin/Boston, MA: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. and Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi. 1994. Morphopragmatics. Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German, and other languages (TiLSM 76). Berlin/New York, NY: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebner, Jakob. 2009. Duden – Wie sagt man in Österreich? Wörterbuch des österreichischen Deutsch. 4th edn. Wien et al.: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1996. Vowels and nailpolish. The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace. In Natasha Warner et al. (eds.), Gender and belief systems. Proceedings of the fourth Berkeley woman and language conference, 183–190. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ender, Andrea and Irmtraud Kaiser. 2009. Zum Stellenwert von Dialekt und Standard im österreichischen und Schweizer Alltag. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 37(2). 266–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glauninger, Manfred M. 2005. Form und Funktion der -(er)l-Deminutive. Am Beispiel des Grazer Deutsch (Schriften zur deutschen Sprache in Österreich 34). Frankfurt a. M. et al.: Lang.Google Scholar
2010. Zwischen Hochdeutsch, Dialekt und Denglisch. “Innere Mehrsprachigkeit” und urbane Kommunikation am Beispiel der Jugendlichen im Ballungsraum Wien. In Stephan Gaisbauer and Klaus Petermayr (eds.), Übergang. Kommunikation in der Stadt und an ihren Rändern (Schriften zur Literatur und Sprache in Oberösterreich 14), 181–193. Linz: Adalbert-Stifter-Institut des Landes Oberösterreich.Google Scholar
Hinskens, Frans. 1996. Dialect levelling in Limburg. Structural and sociolinguistic aspects (Linguistische Arbeiten 356). Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Dialect levelling. A two-dimensional process. Folia Linguistica 32(1–2). 35–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2010. Locating language in identity. In Carmen Llamas and Dominic Watt (eds.), Language and identities, 29–36. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Jennifer Andrus and Andrew E. Danielson. 2006. Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”. Journal of English Linguistics 34(2). 77–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel. 1996. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72(3). 533–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keniston, Kenneth. 1968. Young radicals. Notes on committed youth. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 2003. Dialect levelling and geographical diffusion in British English. In David Britain and Jenny Cheshire (eds.), Social dialectology. In honour of Peter Trudgill (Impact 16), 223–243. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleene, Andrea. 2017. Attitudinal-perzeptive Variationslinguistik im bairischen Sprachraum. Horizontale und vertikale Grenzen aus der Hörerperspektive. Doctoral thesis. Vienna: University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Korecky-Kröll, Katharina. accepted. „Ma tuat net so vüü verniedlichen“ – oder doch? Verweigerung und Hinzufügung von Diminutiven als Schnittstellenprobleme von mündlichen „Wenker“-Übersetzungs-aufgaben. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik.
. 2020. Morphological dynamics of German adjective gradation in rural regions of Austria. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 87(1), 25–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, Kjeld and Mats Thelander. 1984. On dialect levelling in Denmark and Sweden. Folia Linguistica 18(1–2). 223–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors (Language in Society 29). Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Löffler, Heinrich. 2010. Germanistische Soziolinguistik. 4., neu bearb. Auflage (Grundlagen der Germanistik 28). Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 2003. “What’s in a name?” Social labeling and gender practices. In Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.), The handbook of language and gender (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics 13), 69–97. Malden, MA et al.: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 1993. Koineization in the Bhojpuri-Hindi diaspora – with special reference to South Africa. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 99(1). 25–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Language and social networks. 2nd edn. (Language in Society 2). Oxford/New York, NY: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Oberdorfer, Georg and Anna Weiß. 2016. “Sprachliche Mode(n)” in der Kommunikation unter österreichischen Jugendlichen. LiTheS. Zeitschrift für Literatur- und Theatersoziologie 13. 101–119.Google Scholar
. 2018. Youth language(s) in Austria. State of research and first findings. In Arne Ziegler (ed.), Youth languages. Current perspectives of international research, 2 vols., 463–488. Berlin/Boston, MA: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo and Ana C. Zentella. 2012. Spanish in New York. Language contact, dialect leveling, and structural continuity. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 2015. Contemporary urban vernaculars. In Jacomine Nortier and Bente A. Svendsen (eds.), Language, youth and identity in the 21st century. Linguistic practices across urban spaces, 24–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reiffenstein, Ingo. 1982. Hochsprachliche Norm und regionale Varianten der Hochsprache. Deutsch in Österreich. In Hans Moser (ed.), Zur Situation des Deutschen in Südtirol. Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zu den Fragen von Sprachnorm und Sprachkontakt (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft. Germanistische Reihe 13), 9–18. Innsbruck: Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans U. 2012. Bairisch. Das Wichtigste in Kürze. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen E. and Joachim Herrgen. 2011. Sprachdynamik. Eine Einführung in die moderne Regionalsprachenforschung (Grundlagen der Germanistik 49). Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Sonja et al. 2019. Diminutivvariation in österreichischen elektronischen Korpora. In Lars Bülow, Ann K. Fischer and Kristina Herbert (eds.), Dimensions of linguistic space: Variation – Multilingualism – Conceptualisations (Schriften zur deutschen Sprache in Österreich 45), 147–162. Berlin et al.: Lang.Google Scholar
Seebold, Elmar. 1983. Diminutivformen in den deutschen Dialekten. In Werner Besch et al. (eds.), Dialektologie. Ein Handbuch zur deutschen und allgemeinen Dialektforschung, vol. 2 (HSK 1.2). Reprint 2008, 1250–1255. Berlin/Boston, MA: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret et al. 2011. A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Translated and adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten. Gesprächsforschung 12. 1–51.Google Scholar
Soukup, Barbara. 2009. Dialect use as interaction strategy. A sociolinguistic study of contextualization, speech perception, and language attitudes in Austria (Austrian Studies in English 98). Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Steinegger, Guido. 1998. Sprachgebrauch und Sprachbeurteilung in Österreich und Südtirol. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage (Schriften zur deutschen Sprache in Österreich 26). Frankfurt a. M. et al.: Lang.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2016. Teen talk. The language of adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2). 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1974. Linguistic change and diffusion. Description and explanation. Language in Society 3(2). 215–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Dialects in contact (Language in Society 10). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter et al. 2000. Determinism in new-dialect formation and the genesis of New Zealand English. Journal of Linguistics 36(2). 299–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandekerckhove, Reinhild. 2010. Urban and rural language. In Peter Auer and Jürgen E. Schmidt (eds.), Language and space. An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 1: Theories and methods (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.1), 315–331. Berlin et al.: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Variantengrammatik = Variantengrammatik des Standarddeutschen. 2018. [Regional variation in the grammar of Standard German]. An open access online reference work compiled by a team under the leadership of Christa Dürscheid, Stephan Elspaß and Arne Ziegler. [URL]. (18 February, 2020.)
Wiesinger, Peter. 2014. Das österreichische Deutsch in Gegenwart und Geschichte. 3rd edn. (Austria: Forschung und Wissenschaft – Literatur- und Sprachwissenschaft 2). Vienna et al.: LIT.Google Scholar
Zehetner, Ludwig. 1985. Das bairische Dialektbuch. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Arne. 2018. Undoing Youth. Dialect levelling and restandardisation in urban vernaculars in Austria. In Arne Ziegler (ed.), Youth languages. Current perspectives of international research, 2 vols., 49–65. Berlin/Boston, MA: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wirtz, Mason A., Simone E. Pfenninger, Irmtraud Kaiser & Andrea Ender
2024. Sociolinguistic competence and varietal repertoires in a second language: A study on addressee‐dependent varietal behavior using virtual reality. The Modern Language Journal 108:2 ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.