Cover not available
Part of
Variation in Second and Heritage Languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Robert Bayley, Dennis R. Preston and Xiaoshi Li
[Studies in Language Variation 28] 2022
► pp. 253–278

Chapter 10
Variation, identity and language attitudes

Polish migrants in France

ORCID logo | University College Dublin
This chapter examines migrants’ use of French L2, analysing the speech of ten L1 Polish speakers, thirty to sixty years, in a naturalistic setting. Using informal conversations, this study focuses on L1 variation patterns; specifically ne deletion, a sensitive and powerful indicator of social issues, using Rbrul. The data permit comparison of use of the same sociolinguistic variable by L2 speakers from two different L1 typological groups: Polish and English. The analysis showed the migrants broadly adopt L1 speech patterns, constraint ordering, and frequently even rates (as had the more formal L1 English learners) with universalistic implications for sociolinguistic variation acquisition. However, two couples are ‘outliers.’ Qualitative analysis indicates that differences in the speech of these two couples relate to language attitudes and ideology and suggests language ideology plays an important role in L2 acquisition and use. Complementary quantitative and qualitative analyses reveal aspects of L2 acquisition, which, separately, might not have been captured.
Keywords: French, language attitudes, language ideology, identity, migration, ‘ne’ deletion Polish migrants
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • Language variation, migration and superdiversity
    • Migration and identity construction
    • Variation in L2 speech and individual variation
  • The study: Poles in France
  • Methodology
    • The Variable: ne deletion
  • Results
  • A tale of two couples
    • The first Polish couple
    • The second couple
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 July 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.28.10reg
References (37)
References
Adamson, H. D. & Vera Regan. 1991. The acquisition of community norms by Asian immigrants learning English as a second language: A preliminary study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13. 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel. 2002. Variable deletion of French ne: A cross-stylistic perspective. Language Sciences 24(2). 153–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel & Alan Smith. 2002. The influence of linguistic and social factors on the recent decline of ne. Journal of French Language Studies 12. 23–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, William. 1976. The loss of the negative morpheme ne in Parisian French. Lingua. 39: 119-137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1981. The loss of the negative particle in French. Language 57. 674–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Un nouveau regard sur la chute du ne en francais parle tourangeau: s’agit-il d’un changement en cours? Journal of French Language Studies 11. 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid modernity. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert & Juliet Langman. 2004. Variation in the group and the individual: Evidence from second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 42. 303–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coveney, Aidan. 1998. Awareness of linguistic constraints on variable ne omission. Journal of French Language Studies 8. 159–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc, & Adrian Furnham. 2000. Personality and speech production: A pilot study of second language learners. Personality and Individual Differences 28. 355–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc & Vera Regan. 2002. Maîtriser la norme sociolinguistique en interlangue francaise: le cas de l’omission variable de ‘ne’. Journal of French Language Studies 12. 123–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dick, Hilary Parsons & Lynette Arnold. 2017. Multisited ethnography and language in the study of migration. In Suresh Canagarajah (ed.), The Routledge handbook of migration and language, 397–412. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diskin, Chloe & Vera Regan. 2015. Migratory experience and second language acquisition among Polish and Chinese migrants in Dublin, Ireland. In Fanny Forsberg Lundell & Inge Bartning (eds.), Cultural migrants and optimal language acquisition, 137–177. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The attitudes of recently-arrived Polish migrants to Irish English. World Englishes 36(2). 191–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41. 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greiner, Clemens & Patrick Sakdapolrak. 2013. Translocality: concepts, applications and emerging research perspectives. Geography Compass 7(5). 373–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. Getting off the Goldvarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language & Linguistics Compass 3. 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalaja, Paula & Maria Ferreira Barcelos (eds). 2003. Beliefs about SLA. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Martineau, France & Raymond Mougeon. 2003. A sociolinguistic study of the origins of ne deletion in European and Quebec French. Language 79. 118-152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myles, Florence & Rosamund Mitchell. 1998. Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Nestor, Niamh, Caitríona Ni Chasaide & Vera Regan. 2012. Discourse like and social identity – A case study of Poles in Ireland. In Bettina Migge & Máire Ni Chiosain (Eds.), New perspectives on Irish English, 327–354. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy & Dennis R. Preston. 2003. Folk linguistics, rev. edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Parkin, David. 2016. From multilingual classification to translingual ontology: A turning point. In Karel Arnaut, Jan Blommaert, Ben Rampton & Massimilliano Spotti (eds.), Language and superdiversity, 71–88. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Regan, Vera. 1995. The acquisition of sociolinguistic native speech norms: Effects of a year abroad on second language learners of French. In Barbara Freed (ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context, 245–267. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Variation in French interlanguage: A longitudinal study of sociolinguistic competence. In Robert Bayley & Dennis Preston (eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation, 177–203. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The relationship between the group and the individual and the acquisition of native speaker variation patterns: A preliminary study. International Review of Applied Linguistics 42. 335–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. The bookseller and the basketball player: Tales from the French Polonia. In David Singleton, Vera Regan & Ewelina Debaene (eds.), Linguistic & cultural acquisition in a migrant community, 28–48. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Tales of the Celtic tiger: Migrants’ language use and identity. In Margaret Keneally & Michael Kelleher (eds.), Ireland and Quebec: Multidisciplinary perspectives on history, culture and society, 113–130. Dublin: Four Courts Press.Google Scholar
Regan, Vera & Ewelina Debaene. 2013. Linguistic vitality and the Polish community in France. In Jean E. Conacher & Barbara Geraghty (Eds.), Intercultural contact, language learning and migration, 41–60. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Regan, Vera & Niamh Nestor. 2010. French Poles, language and identity: An intergenerational snapshot. In Vera Regan & Caitríona Ni Chasaide (eds.), Language practices and identity construction by multilingual speakers of French L2. The acquisition of sociolinguistic variation, 145–158. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Diane Vincent. 1980. The productive use of ne in spoken Montréal French. In Gillian Sankoff, The social life of language, 295–310. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singleton, David & Lisa Ryan. 2004. Language acquisition: The age factor. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1983. Discourse analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Urry, John. 2002. Global complexity. Malden, MA.: Polity.Google Scholar
Vertovec, Steven. 2007. Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(6). 1024–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wirtz, Mason A., Simone E. Pfenninger, Irmtraud Kaiser & Andrea Ender
2024. Sociolinguistic competence and varietal repertoires in a second language: A study on addressee‐dependent varietal behavior using virtual reality. The Modern Language Journal 108:2 ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.