Cover not available
Part of
The Continuity of Linguistic Change: Selected papers in honour of Juan Andrés Villena-Ponsoda
Edited by Matilde Vida-Castro and Antonio Manuel Ávila-Muñoz
[Studies in Language Variation 31] 2024
► pp. 164–182

Chapter 8
After dialectalisation

An overview of ongoing processes of convergence in Italian

| University of Turin, Italy
This paper provides an overview of ongoing processes of convergence in the Italian language. It focuses on regional varieties of Italian, which essentially are the result of the so-called dialectalisation of the standard language and are nowadays affected by extensive processes of vertical and horizontal convergence. It considers the “downward” convergence of the standard usage towards sub-standard varieties, the “upward” convergence of sub-standard varieties towards the standard usage, and the supra-regional use, i.e. “horizontal” diffusion, of linguistic features originally confined to distinct geographic areas. The overall picture suggests that differences persist between regional varieties of Italian, though they are becoming increasingly less pronounced.
Keywords: Italian, Italo-Romance dialects, regional variation, vertical convergence, horizontal convergence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Italian and Italo-Romance dialects
  • 3.Vertical convergence
  • 4.Horizontal convergence
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 February 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.31.08cer
References (58)
References
Alfonzetti, Giovanna. 1997. ‘Ora la luna si nascose, ma prima era bellissima’. Passato prossimo e passato remoto nell’italiano di Sicilia [‘The moon has gone into hiding now, but it was really beautiful before’. The compound past and simple past in Sicilian Italian]. In Mari D’Agostino (ed.), Aspetti della variabilità, 11–48. Palermo: Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani.Google Scholar
ALS (Atlante Linguistico della Sicilia). [URL]. (26 November, 2021.)
Amenta, Luisa. 2020. Strutture tempo-aspettuali nel siciliano e nell’italiano regionale di Sicilia [Tense and aspect in Sicilian and Sicilian Italian]. Palermo: Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani.Google Scholar
Ammon, Ulrich. 2015. On the social forces that determine what is standard in a language, with a look at the norms of non-standard language varieties. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée (VALS-ASLA) 3. 53–67.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter (ed.). 1998. Dialect levelling and the standard varieties in Europe. Folia Linguistica 32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect-standard constellations. In Nicole Delbecque, Johan van der Auwera & Dirk Geeraerts (eds.), Perspectives on variation. Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative, 7–42. Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The neo-standard of Italy and elsewhere in Europe. In Massimo Cerruti, Claudia Crocco & Stefania Marzo (Eds.), Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian, 365–374. Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, Frans Hinskens & Klaus J. Mattheier (eds.). 1996. Convergence and divergence of dialects in Europe. Sociolinguistica 10.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter, Frans Hinskens & Paul Kerswill (eds.). 2005. Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Helmut Spiekermann. 2011. Demotisation of the standard variety or destandardisation? The changing status of German in late modernity (with special reference to south-western Germany). In Tore Kristiansen & Nikolas Coupland (eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe, 161–176. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Ballarè, Silvia. 2020. L’italiano neo-standard oggi: Stato dell’arte [Neo-standard Italian today: State of the art]. Italiano LinguaDue 12(2). 469–492.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano. 2005. Dialect-standard convergence, mixing, and models of language contact: The case of Italy. In Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens & Paul Kerswill (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 81–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Quale dialetto per l’Italia del Duemila? Aspetti dell’italianizzazione e risorgenze dialettali in Piemonte (e altrove) [Which dialect for Italy in the 2000s? Certain aspects of Italianisation and dialect ‘resurgences’ in Piedmont (and elsewhere)]. In Alberto A. Sobrero & Annarita Miglietta (eds.), Lingua e dialetto nell’Italia del Duemila, 101–‍127. Galatina: Congedo.Google Scholar
. 2012. Sociolinguistica dell’italiano contemporaneo. Nuova edizione [Sociolinguistics of contemporary Italian. Revised edition]. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
. 2018a. The languages and dialects of Italy. In Wendy Ayres-Bennett & Janice Carruthers (eds.), Manual of Romance sociolinguistics, 494–525. Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018b. Tendenze nell’italiano del Duemila e rapporti fra varietà standard e sub-standard [Trends in the Italian of the 2000s and relationships between standard and sub-standard varieties]. AggiornaMenti 13. 5–15.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1986. Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo italiano. Il sistema dell’indicativo [Tense, aspect and aktionsart in the Italian verb: The system of the indicative]. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Michele Loporcaro. 2005. The sound pattern of Standard Italian, as compared with the varieties spoken in Florence, Milan and Rome. Journal of The Phonetic Association 35. 131–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boario, Anna. 2017. Native speaker–non-native speaker interaction: More than one type of accommodation. Sociolinguistic Studies 11(2–3–4). 291–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calamai, Silvia. 2017. Tuscan between standard and vernacular: A sociophonetic perspective. In Massimo Cerruti, Claudia Crocco & Stefania Marzo (eds.), Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian, 213–241. Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canepari, Luciano. 1983. Italiano standard e pronunce regionali [Standard Italian and regional pronunciations]. Padova: CLEUP.Google Scholar
. 1999. Il MaPi. Manuale di pronuncia italiana [MaPi. The Handbook of Italian pronunciation]. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Castellani, Arrigo. 1982. Quanti erano gli italofoni nel 1861? [How many speakers of Italian were there in 1861?]. Studi Linguistici Italiani 8. 3–26.Google Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo. 2009. Strutture dell’italiano regionale. Morfosintassi di una varietà diatopica in prospettiva sociolinguistica [Structures of regional Italian. Morphosyntax of a diatopic variety in a sociolinguistic perspective]. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
. 2011. Regional varieties of Italian in the linguistic repertoire. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 210. 9–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. From language contact to language variation: A case of contact-induced grammaticalization in Italo-Romance. Journal of Language Contact 7(2). 288–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Morphosyntactic variation: Individual grammar and group grammar in the ‘de-dialectalization’ of Italian. Sociolinguistic Studies 11(2–3–4). 313–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Il parlato regionale oggi: un italiano composito? [Regional speech today: A composite Italian?]. Lingua Italiana d’Oggi 15. 15–31.Google Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo, Claudia Crocco & Stefania Marzo (eds.). 2017. Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian. Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo & Riccardo Regis. 2014. Standardization patterns and dialect-standard convergence: A northwestern Italian perspective. Language in Society 43(1). 83–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo & Stavroula Tsiplakou (eds.). 2020. Intermediate language varieties. Koinai and regional standards in Europe. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CLIPS (Corpora e Lessici di Italiano Parlato e Scritto). [URL]. (26 November, 2021.)
Cortinovis, Enrica & Emanuele Miola. 2009. Chiamami rappuso: Il suffisso -uso dai dialetti meridionali al linguaggio giovanile torinese [Call me rappuso: The spread of the suffix -uso from southern dialects to youth varieties in Turin]. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 33. 195–218.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1980. “Historische Sprache” und “Dialekt” [“Historical language” and “dialect”]. In Joachim Göschel, Pavle Iviæ & Kurt Kehr (eds.), Dialekt und Dialektologie, 106–122. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Crocco, Claudia. 2017. Everyone has an accent: Standard Italian and regional pronunciation. In Massimo Cerruti, Claudia Crocco & Stefania Marzo (eds.), Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian, 89–117. Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Achille, Paolo & Andrea Viviani (eds.). 2003. La lingua delle città. I dati di Roma, Latina, L’Aquila e Catania [The language of the cities. Data from Rome, Latina, L’Aquila and Catania]. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, Mari. 2012. Sociolinguistica dell’Italia contemporanea [Sociolinguistics of contemporary Italy]. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Dal Negro, Silvia & Alessandro Vietti. 2011. Italian and Italo-Romance dialects. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 210. 71–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 1976. Storia linguistica dell’Italia unita [Linguistic history of unified Italy]. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
De Ninno, Maria Antonietta. 2019. L’italiano regionale campano: Analisi sociolinguistica di alcuni tratti morfosintattici [Regional Italian in Campania: A sociolinguistic analysis of certain morphosyntactic features]. Turin: University of Turin MA thesis.Google Scholar
De Pascale, Stefano, Stefania Marzo & Dirk Speelman. 2017. Evaluating regional variation in Italian: Towards a change in standard language ideology? In Massimo Cerruti, Claudia Crocco & Stefania Marzo (eds.), Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian, 118–141. Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12. 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiaschi, Davide & Cristina Tealdi. 2018. Some stylised facts on Italian inter-regional migration. Discussion Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Management dell’Università di Pisa 231, [URL]. (20 September, 2021.)Google Scholar
Fontanot, Arianna. 2019. Aspetti di italiano composito nella pronuncia di giovani torinesi: un’indagine su corpora [Composite Italian in the pronunciation of young speakers in Turin: a corpus-based analysis]. Turin: University of Turin MA thesis.Google Scholar
Galli de’ Paratesi, Nora. 1984. Lingua toscana in bocca ambrosiana. Tendenze verso l’italiano standard: un’inchiesta sociolinguistica [The Tuscan language as spoken by the Ambrosians. Tendencies towards standard Italian: a sociolinguistic investigation]. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Impicciatore, Roberto & Nazareno Panichella. 2019. Internal migration trajectories, occupational achievement and social mobility in contemporary Italy. A life course perspective. Population Space and Place 25(6). 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ISTAT. 2017. L’uso della lingua italiana, dei dialetti e delle lingue straniere [The use of Italian, dialects and foreign languages]. Roma: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. [URL]. (20 September, 2021.)
Kerswill, Paul & Peter Trudgill. 2005. The birth of new dialects. In Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens & Paul Kerswill (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 196–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KIParla (Corpus di Italiano Parlato). [URL]. (26 November, 2021.)
Maiden, Martin & Mair Parry. 1997. Introduction. In Martin Maiden & Mair Parry (eds.), The dialects of Italy, 1–4. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moretti, Bruno. 2006. Nuovi aspetti della relazione italiano-dialetto in Ticino [New aspects of the relationship between Italian and dialect in the Canton of Ticino]. In Alberto A. Sobrero & Annarita Miglietta (eds.), Lingua e dialetto nell’Italia del Duemila, 31–48. Galatina: Congedo.Google Scholar
Nesi, Annalisa (ed.). 2013. La lingua delle città. Raccolta di studi [The language of the cities. A collection of studies]. Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar
Nesi, Annalisa & Teresa Poggi-Salani. 2013. “La lingua delle città”. Che cos’è e a cosa serve [“The language of the cities”. What it is and what it is for]. In Annalisa Nesi (ed.), La lingua delle città. Raccolta di studi, 15–45. Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, Giovan Battista. 1977. Carta dei dialetti d’Italia [Map of the dialects of Italy]. Pisa: Pacini. [URL]. (1 June, 2022.)Google Scholar
Regis, Riccardo. 2006. Breve fenomenologia di una locuzione avverbiale: il solo più dell’italiano regionale piemontese [A brief phenomenology of an adverbial locution: Solo più in Piedmontese Italian]. Studi di lessicografia italiana 23. 275–289.Google Scholar
. 2017. How regional standards set in: The case of standard Piedmontese Italian. In Massimo Cerruti, Claudia Crocco & Stefania Marzo (eds.), Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian, 145–175. Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rüegg, Robert. 1956. Zur Wortgeographie der Italienischen Umgangssprache [On the word geography of colloquial Italian]. Köln: Kölner Romanistische Arbeiten.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario & Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2000. The simple and compound past in Romance languages. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 403–440. Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar