Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 12:1 (1988) ► pp.199–209
Book review

Julia Horvath. Focus in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris, 1985. 241 pp.

Reviewed by
| University of Groningen
Published online: 1 January 1988
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.16mar
References (39)
References
Abraham, W.; and De Mey, S. (eds). 1986. Topic, focus and configurationality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ackerman, F. 1984. “Verbal modifiers as argument taking predicates: complex verbs as predicate complexes in Hungarian.” Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik. 251:23–71.Google Scholar
Aoun, J.; and Sportiche, D. 1983. “On the formal theory of government.” Linguistic Review 21:211–36.Google Scholar
Belletti, A.; and Rizzi, L. 1982. “On the syntax of ne: some theoretical implications.” Linguistic Review 11:117–155.Google Scholar
Bennis, H.; and Beukema, F. (eds). 1985. Linguistics in the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1976. “Conditions on rules of grammar.” Linguistic Analysis 21:303–49.Google Scholar
1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Farmer, A. 1980. “On the interaction of morphology and syntax.” MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Gil, D. 1987. “Definiteness, noun phrase-configurationality, and the countmass distinction.” In: ter Meulen and Reuland (eds) 1987:325–352.Google Scholar
Hale, K. 1980. “Remarks on Japanese phrase structure: comments on the papers on Japanese syntax.” In: Otsu and Farmer (eds) 1980:85–199.Google Scholar
1981. On the position of Warlpiri in a typology of the base. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
1982. “Preliminary remarks on configurationality.” New England Linguistic Society XII1: 86–96.Google Scholar
1983. “Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 5–47.Google Scholar
Horvath, J. 1981. “Aspects of Hungarian syntax and the theory of grammar”. UCLA dissertation.Google Scholar
Hunyadi, L. 1981. “The expression of linguistic polarity in Hungarian” (in Hungarian). PhD. Dissertation, University of Debrecen.Google Scholar
1984. “The expression of logical scope in Hungarian.” Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik. 241:1–27.Google Scholar
Kenesei, I. 1984. “On what really figures in a non-configurational language.” Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik. 241:28–54.Google Scholar
1986. “On the logic of word order in Hungarian.” In: Abraham and De Mey (eds). 1986:143–59.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, K. 1981a. “Structural relations in Hungarian, a ‘free’ word order language.” Linguistic Inquiry 121:185–213.Google Scholar
1981b. “Topic and Focus: the operators of the Hungarian sentence.” Folia Linguistica XV (3–4):306–30.Google Scholar
1982. “Subject-object symmetries”. Ms. University of Budapest.Google Scholar
1984. “The order and scope of operators in the Hungarian sentence.” Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 241:82–126.Google Scholar
1985. “Is the VP universal?” Ms. University of Budapest.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. 1980. “On the organization of the lexicon”. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Marácz, L. K. 1984. “On the grammar of the PP in Hungarian”. Groningen M.A. Thesis.Google Scholar
1985. “Some notes on Weak Crossover in Hungarian.” In: Bennis and Beukema (eds). 1985:129–39.Google Scholar
1986. “Dressed or naked: the case of the Hungarian PP.” In: Abraham and De Mey (eds). 1986:227–52.Google Scholar
1986. “On Coreferential and Bound Variable Interpretation in Non Configurational Languages.” Theoretical Linguistic Research 2(2):85–172.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
May, R. 1986. Logical Form: its structure and derivation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
ter Meulen, A. and Reuland, E. (eds). 1987. The representation of indefiniteness. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Otsu, Y. and Farmer, A. (eds). 1980. MIT working papers in linguistics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Saito, M. 1985. “Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications”. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Saito, M. and H. Hoji. 1983. “Weak Crossover and move alpha in Japanese.” New England Linguistic Society 11:245–259.Google Scholar
Stowell, T. 1981. “Origins of phrase structure.” MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A. 1981. “The possessive construction in Hungarian: a configurational category in a non-configurational language.” Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 311:216–289.Google Scholar
1983. “Focussing properties, or the trap of first order.” Theoretical Linguistics 2(3): 125–45.Google Scholar
1984. “The possessor that ran away from home.” Linguistic Review 31:89–102.Google Scholar