Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 15:1 (1991) ► pp.85–114
Isomorphism in the Grammatical Code
Cognitive and Biological Considerations
Cited by
Cited by 59 other publications
ABRAÇADO, Jussara
2001. O princípio da adjacência e o grau de integração entre verbo e objeto. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 17:2 ► pp. 323 ff. 
Beni, Majid Davoody
2017. The Code Model of Biosemiotics and the Fate of the Structuralist Theory of Mental Representation. Biosemiotics 10:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
BERG, THOMAS
2019. Adjective phrases with doubly modified heads: how lexical information influences word order and constituent structure. English Language and Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 341 ff.
Bernárdez, Enrique
1997. A partial synergetic model of Deagentivisation. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 4:1-3 ► pp. 53 ff.
Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020. Chapter 7. Illocution as a unit of reference for spontaneous speech. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 221 ff.
Breunesse, Merlijn & Holger Diessel
2023. Chapter 7. Iconicity in spatial deixis. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 185 ff.
Campbell, Lyle
2000. What’s wrong with grammaticalization?. Language Sciences 23:2-3 ► pp. 113 ff.
Chrabaszcz, Anna, Elena Onischik & Olga Dragoy
2022. Sentence comprehension in heritage language: Isomorphism, word order, and language transfer. Second Language Research 38:4 ► pp. 839 ff.
Cucatto, Mariana
2021. Para mayor satisfacción (de): expresión conectiva plurifuncional, fundamentación y disuasión. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 88 ► pp. 107 ff.
Cuyckens, Hubert
2018. Introduction. Exploring English historical syntax. In Explorations in English Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 198], ► pp. 1 ff.
Daniels, Don
2021. The issue of arbitrariness in syntactic reconstruction. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s2 ► pp. 393 ff.
FAGARD, BENJAMIN & MICHEL CHAROLLES
2018. Ailleurs, d'ailleurs, par ailleurs :De l'espace à l'humain, de l'humain au discours. Journal of French Language Studies 28:3 ► pp. 351 ff.
Futrell, Richard & Michael Hahn
2022. Information Theory as a Bridge Between Language Function and Language Form. Frontiers in Communication 7
Gaeta, Livio
2006. How to Live Naturally and not be Bothered by Economy. Folia Linguistica 40:1part2 ► pp. 7 ff.
Givón, T.
Givón, T.
Goldberg, Adele & Laura Suttle
2010. Construction grammar. WIREs Cognitive Science 1:4 ► pp. 468 ff.
Goldberg, Adele E
2003. Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7:5 ► pp. 219 ff.
GOLDBERG, ADELE E.
2013. Explanation and Constructions: Response to Adger. Mind & Language 28:4 ► pp. 479 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2018. Taming iconicity in the Spanish and Italian translations of Shakespeare’sSonnets. English Text Construction 11:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin
2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hens, Gregor
1997. Constructional Semantics in German: The Dative of Inaction. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Höglund, Mikko
2018. Complementation of ashamed – diachrony and determinants of variation. In Changing Structures [Studies in Language Companion Series, 195], ► pp. 89 ff.
Iyeiri, Yoko
2018. Chapter 5. Causative make and its infinitival complements in Early Modern English. In Explorations in English Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 198], ► pp. 139 ff.
Iza Erviti, Aneider
2021. Contrast Constructions. In Discourse Constructions in English [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 121 ff.
Karlsson, Emanuel
2018. A Radical Construction Grammar approach to construction split in the diachrony of the spatial particles of Ancient Greek. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 277 ff.
Levshina, Natalia
2022. Corpus-based typology: applications, challenges and some solutions. Linguistic Typology 26:1 ► pp. 129 ff.
Levshina, Natalia, Savithry Namboodiripad, Marc Allassonnière-Tang, Mathew Kramer, Luigi Talamo, Annemarie Verkerk, Sasha Wilmoth, Gabriela Garrido Rodriguez, Timothy Michael Gupton, Evan Kidd, Zoey Liu, Chiara Naccarato, Rachel Nordlinger, Anastasia Panova & Natalia Stoynova
2023. Why we need a gradient approach to word order. Linguistics 0:0
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Jaume Mateu
2020. Motion events again: Delimiting constructional patterns. Lingua 247 ► pp. 102956 ff.
Li, Wendan
2000. The pragmatic function of numeral-classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 32:8 ► pp. 1113 ff.
Lu, Xiaolong
2022. The constructionalization of antonymous compounds. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 48:1 ► pp. 30 ff.
Mayer, Rolf
1992. To win and lose: Linguistic aspects of prospect theory. Language and Cognitive Processes 7:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
McNeill, David & Elena T. Levy
1993. Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes 16:4 ► pp. 363 ff.
Mondorf, Britta
2016. “Snake legs it to freedom”: Dummy it as pseudo-object”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:1
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1994. A note on Chomsky on form and function. Journal of Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 245 ff.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2000. Deconstructing grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23:2-3 ► pp. 187 ff.
Okada, Sadayuki
1998. Reflexive pronouns with split antecedents. Journal of Pragmatics 30:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Perniss, Pamela & Gabriella Vigliocco
2014. The bridge of iconicity: from a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369:1651 ► pp. 20130300 ff.
Pleyer, Michael, Stefan Hartmann, James Winters & Jordan Zlatev
2017. Interaction and iconicity in the evolution of language. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3 ► pp. 303 ff.
Rohdenburg, Günter
2014. Syntactic constraints on the use of dual form intensifiers in Modern English. In Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 63], ► pp. 131 ff.
Roldan-Riejos, Ana
2021. Corpus-Based Discourse Analysis: Titles in Civil Engineering Research Articles. In Mediating Specialized Knowledge and L2 Abilities, ► pp. 311 ff.
Seržant, Ilja A., Katarzyna Maria Janic, Darja Dermaku & Oneg Ben Dror
2021. Typology of coding patterns and frequency effects of antipassives. Studies in Language 45:4 ► pp. 968 ff.
Song, Jae Jung
1995. Causatives and transitivity. Lingua 97:2-3 ► pp. 211 ff.
Temperley, David & Daniel Gildea
2018. Minimizing Syntactic Dependency Lengths: Typological/Cognitive Universal?. Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Tseng, Yu‐Ching
2020.
An Interface of Syntactic and Semantic OT Accounts of Hakka
KAI
in [ADJP/NP
KAI
N] Constructions1
. Studia Linguistica 74:3 ► pp. 553 ff.
Uljas, Sami
2021. Iconicity and Semantic-Structural Mapping in Earlier Egyptian Complementation. Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies :29 ► pp. 215 ff.
Watanabe, Ayano & Yoko Iyeiri
2020. Explaining the variability of adjective comparatives and superlatives: entering the twenty-first century. <i>WORD</i> 66:2 ► pp. 71 ff.
Wu, Shuqiong & Jie Zhang
2022. Antonym order in English and Chinese coordinate structures. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 530 ff.
Xu, Jiajin & Hui Kang
2022. Salience-simplification strategy for markedness of causal subordinators: “Because” and “since” in argumentative essays. Lingua 272 ► pp. 103256 ff.
YAMAGUCHI, KAZUYUKI
2007. What Do Mature Phenomena Reveal about Grammaticalization Processes? (^|^Ouml;. Dahl, The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 24:2 ► pp. 684 ff.
Zhang, Bin
2022.
Sonja Taigel:
Ikonizität
. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41:2 ► pp. 429 ff.
Петрова , Инна Михайловна
2020. Нарушение иконичности языкового знака как показатель изменения когнитивного фокуса (на материале английского языка). ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ НАУКИ :№12/3 ► pp. 119 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Why are zero-marked phrases close to their heads?. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, ► pp. 175 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Support for more-support. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, ► pp. 251 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.