Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 15:1 (1991) ► pp.149–174
Book review

Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.). Topics in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1988. x + 704 pp. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 50].

Reviewed by
| University of California, Los Angeles
Published online: 1 January 1991
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.15.1.08kir
References (37)
References
Aarsleff, Hans. 1970. “The history of linguistics and Professor Chomsky”. Language 461: 570–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Raimo. 1985. “Language, cognition, and linguistics”. In: Makkai and Melby (eds) 1985: 11–22.Google Scholar
Bluhme, Hermann; and Hammarström, Göran (eds). 1987. Descriptio linguistica: Proceedings of the first conference on descriptive and structural linguistics, Antwerp 9–10 September 1985. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1965. “The atomization of meaning”. Language 411: 555–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugman, Claudia. 1981. Story of Over. M.A. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Diver, William. 1975. “Introduction”. Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 1–20. (Second, corrected printing, 1980).Google Scholar
. 1977. “A concise grammar of Modern English I”. Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics 41: 1–20.Google Scholar
. 1981. “On defining the discipline”. Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics 61: 59–117.Google Scholar
. 1982. “The focus-control interlock in Latin”. Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics 71: 13–31.Google Scholar
. 1986. “The history of linguistics in the West. How the study of language went wrong in the Western tradition”. Helicon 111: 43–68. Nara City, Japan: Tezukayama College English Department.Google Scholar
García, Erica C. 1975. The role of theory in linguistic analysis: The Spanish pronoun system. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1986. Woordbetekenis: Een overzicht van de lexicale semantiek. Leuven: Uitgeverij Acco.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.). 1963. Universals of language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John (ed.). 1985. Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1985. “Introduction”. In: Haiman (ed.) 1985: 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun; Hulst, Harry van der; and Moortgat, Michael (eds). 1981. Perspectives on functional grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kirsner, Robert S. 1975. “On the mechanism of the restriction of the Dutch ‘pseudo-passive’ to human actions”. Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 93–125. (Second, corrected printing, 1980).Google Scholar
1979. The problem of presentative sentences in Modern Dutch. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1983. “On the use of quantitative discourse data to determine inferential mechanisms in grammar”. In: Klein-Andreu (ed.) 1983: 237–257.Google Scholar
Klein-Andreu, Flora (ed.). 1983. Discourse perspectives on syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1983. “Preface”. In: Klein-Andreu (ed.) 1983: xvxvii.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George; and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1982. “Space grammar, analysability, and the English passive”. Language 581: 22–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, Cal: Stanford University PresGoogle Scholar
Makkai, Adam; and Melby, Alan K. (eds). 1985. Linguistics and philosophy: Essays in honor of Rulon S. Wells. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo L. 1977. The meaning of Spanish EL, LA, and LO. Ph.D. dissertation, The City University of New York.Google Scholar
Reid, Wallis. 1974. “The Saussurean sign as a control in linguistic analysis”. Semiotext[e] 11: 31–53.Google Scholar
. 1991. English verb and noun number: A functional explanation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan; and Wilson, Deidre. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar
Tobin, Yishai. 1987. “Three sign-oriented theories: A contrastive approach”. In: Bluhme and Hammarstrm (eds) 1987: 51–75.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1989. From sign to text: A semiotic view of communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. “Introduction”. In: Tobin (ed.) 1989: 1–19.Google Scholar
. 1990. Semiotics and linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1963. “On the semantic structure of language”. In: Greenberg (ed.) 1963: 114–171.Google Scholar
Zubin, David A. 1972. The German case system: Exploitation of the Dative Accusative opposition for comment. Manuscript, Columbia University.Google Scholar
1975. “On the distributional properties of surface morphology and their consequences for semantic analysis”. Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 169–195. (Second, corrected printing, 1980).Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Glynn, Dylan
2014. Polysemy and synonymy. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Foolen, Ad
1992. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Lingua 88:1 ► pp. 76 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.