Book review
Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.). Topics in cognitive linguistics Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1988. x + 704 pp. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 50].
References (37)
Aarsleff, Hans
1970 “
The history of linguistics and Professor Chomsky”.
Language 461: 570–585.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anttila, Raimo
1985 “
Language, cognition, and linguistics”. In:
Makkai and
Melby (eds) 1985: 11–22.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bluhme, Hermann; and Hammarström, Göran
(eds) 1987 Descriptio linguistica: Proceedings of the first conference on descriptive and structural linguistics, Antwerp 9–10 September 1985. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, Dwight
1965 “
The atomization of meaning”.
Language 411: 555–573.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brugman, Claudia
1981 Story of Over. M.A. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diver, William
1975 “
Introduction”.
Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 1–20. (Second, corrected printing 1980).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diver, William
1977 “
A concise grammar of Modern English I”.
Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics 41: 1–20.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diver, William
1981 “
On defining the discipline”.
Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics 61: 59–117.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diver, William
1982 “
The focus-control interlock in Latin”.
Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics 71: 13–31.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diver, William
1986 “
The history of linguistics in the West. How the study of language went wrong in the Western tradition”.
Helicon 111: 43–68. Nara City, Japan: Tezukayama College English Department.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
García, Erica C.
1975 The role of theory in linguistic analysis: The Spanish pronoun system. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, Dirk
1986 Woordbetekenis: Een overzicht van de lexicale semantiek. Leuven: Uitgeverij Acco.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenberg, Joseph H.
(ed.) 1963 Universals of language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoekstra, Teun; Hulst, Harry van der; and Moortgat, Michael
(eds) 1981 Perspectives on functional grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kirsner, Robert S.
1975 “
On the mechanism of the restriction of the Dutch ‘pseudo-passive’ to human actions”.
Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 93–125. (Second, corrected printing 1980).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kirsner, Robert S.
1979 The problem of presentative sentences in Modern Dutch. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kirsner, Robert S.
1983 “
On the use of quantitative discourse data to determine inferential mechanisms in grammar”. In:
Klein-Andreu (ed.) 1983: 237–257.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein-Andreu, Flora
(ed.) 1983 Discourse perspectives on syntax. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein-Andreu, Flora
1983 “
Preface”. In:
Klein-Andreu (ed.) 1983: xvxvii.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George; and Johnson, Mark
1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W.
1982 “
Space grammar, analysability, and the English passive”.
Language 581: 22–80.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I1.
Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, Cal: Stanford University Pres
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Makkai, Adam; and Melby, Alan K.
Otheguy, Ricardo L.
1977 The meaning of Spanish EL, LA, and LO. Ph.D. dissertation, The City University of New York.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reid, Wallis
1974 “
The Saussurean sign as a control in linguistic analysis”.
Semiotext[e] 11: 31–53.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reid, Wallis
1991 English verb and noun number: A functional explanation. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, Dan; and Wilson, Deidre
1986 Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tobin, Yishai
1987 “
Three sign-oriented theories: A contrastive approach”. In:
Bluhme and
Hammarstrm (eds) 1987: 51–75.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tobin, Yishai
1989 “
Introduction”. In:
Tobin (ed.) 1989: 1–19.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tobin, Yishai
1990 Semiotics and linguistics. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weinreich, Uriel
1963 “
On the semantic structure of language”. In:
Greenberg (ed.) 1963: 114–171.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zubin, David A.
1972 The German case system: Exploitation of the Dative Accusative opposition for comment. Manuscript, Columbia University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zubin, David A.
1975 “
On the distributional properties of surface morphology and their consequences for semantic analysis”.
Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 169–195. (Second, corrected printing 1980).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Foolen, Ad
1992.
From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure.
Lingua 88:1
► pp. 76 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.