Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 17:2 (1993) ► pp.469474
References
De Dardel, Robert
1987 “Limites et possibilités de la reconstruction syntaxique”. Linguisticae Investigationes 111: 337–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Martin
1980 “Noun phrases and verb phrases in Romance”. Transactions of the Philological Society. 62–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herman, József
1989 “ Accusativus cum infinitivo et subordonée à quod, quia en latin tardif; nouvelles remarques sur un vieux problème”. In Subordination and Other Topics in Latin, ed. G. Calboli. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 133–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990Du latin aux langages romanes, Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Panhuis, Dirk G.
Pinkster, Harm
1990Latin syntax and semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1991 “Evidence for svo in Latin?”. In Latin and the Romance languages in the Early Middle Ages, ed. R. Wright. London: Routledge, 69–82.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo
1992 “Language universals: Endowment or inheritance?”. Diachronica 91: 47–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Roger
1983 “Unity and diversity in the Romance languages”. Transactions of the Philological Society: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar