Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 42:3 (2018) ► pp.641–668

Cyclic renewal of demonstratives

| University of South-Eastern Norway
Demonstratives, broadly defined as a subclass of deictic expressions used for exophoric reference, do not develop through direct grammaticalization (Diessel 1999: 150). The renewal of demonstratives, and the mechanisms and motivations underlying such processes, have not received as much attention as the related negative cycle. Greenberg’s (1978) observation that demonstratives are often replaced by reinforced forms might shed light on this diachronic process, and this study aims to explore this phenomenon further, as well as its connection with grammaticalization. Reinforcement of demonstratives can lead to the development of new demonstratives, which may catalyze the grammaticalization of old ones through paradigmatic competition (niche competition). The analysis presented here sees reinforcement as a possible driving force behind grammaticalization, and not vice versa, as suggested in Diessel (2006: 474) and van Gelderen (2011: 210), among others.
Keywords: demonstratives, grammatical renewal, cyclic change, grammaticalization, Norwegian, recognitional demonstratives, Jespersen’s cycle, demonstrative cycle, niche competition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Demonstratives and their sources of renewal
    • 2.1Demonstratives
    • 2.2Cyclic renewal
  • 3.Demonstrative reinforcement
    • 3.1Lexical reinforcement
      • 3.1.1‘See’ as a reinforcing expression
      • 3.1.2Locational markers as reinforcing expressions
      • 3.1.3Other reinforcing expressions
    • 3.2Doubling
    • 3.3Affixation
    • 3.4Summary
  • 4.Demonstrative cycles
    • 4.1Schematic overview of stages and outcomes
    • 4.2Niche competition as a catalyst for grammaticalization
    • 4.3Jespersen’s cycle vs. the demonstrative cycle
  • 5.Summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
Published online: 19 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17047.vin
References (58)
Bibliography
Ameka, F. 1994. Ewe. In C. Goddard and A. Wierzbicka (eds.), Semantic and lexical universals: Theory and empirical findings, 57–86, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M. 2016. Competition and the lexicon. In A. Elia, C. Iacobini, and M. Voghera (eds.), Livelli di Analisi e fenomeni di interfaccia. Atti del XLVII congresso internazionale della società di linguistica Italiana, 39–52, Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Boye, K. & P. Harder 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1).1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bugge, S. 1871. Etymologisk forklaring af nogle pronominer i nordisk. Tidskrift for Philologi og Pædagogik 91. 111–129.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B. D. Joseph and J. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 602–623, Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. 1987. The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, 1–33, Hillsdale, New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., R. Schreuder, & S. Buttrick 1983. Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22(2).245–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coventry, K. R., D. Griffiths & C. J. Hamilton 2014. Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: Describing and remembering object location. Cognitive Psychology 691. 46–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. 1991. The evolution of negation. Journal of Linguistics 271(11).1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17(1–2).79–106.Google Scholar
2003. Definite articles in Scandinavian: Competing grammaticalization processes in standard and non-standard varieties. In B. Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-linguistic Perspective, 147–180. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Grammaticalization in the North: Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 4(17).463–489.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2003. Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 27(1).61–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frantz, D. G. 1997. Blackfoot grammar. Toronto: University of Toronto press.Google Scholar
Fritzner, J. 1896. Ordbog over det gamle norske Sprog. Kristiania: Den Norske Forlagsforening.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers. Universals of human language 31. 47–82.Google Scholar
Hansen, E. & L. Heltoft 2011. Grammatik over det Danske Sprog. København: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 1999. A grammar of Koyra Chiini: the Songhay of Timbuktu. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heggstad, L., F. Hødnebø & E. Simensen 2004. Norrøn ordbok, 4 ed. Oslo: Samlaget.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & T. Kuteva 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. & H. Narrog 2010. Grammaticalization and linguistic analysis. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 401–423, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & E. C. Traugott 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1917. Negation in English and other Languages. København: A. F. Høst & Søn.Google Scholar
Johannessen, J. B., J. Priestley, K. Hagen, T. A. Åfarli & Ø. A. Vangsnes 2009. The Nordic Dialect Corpus – an advanced research tool. In K. Jokinen & E. Bick (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics NODALIDA 2009, 73–80, Tartu: Northern European Association for Language Technology (NEALT).Google Scholar
Johansson, N. & G. Carling 2015. The de-iconization and rebuilding of iconicity in spatial deixis: An Indo-European case study. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 47(1).4–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, R. (1994 [1991]). On language change: The invisible hand in language. London and New York: Routledge.
König, E. 2015. Manner deixis as source of grammatical markers in indoeuropean languages. In C. Viti (ed.), Perspectives on historical syntax, 33–60, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. 2015. Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd ed. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lie, S. 2008. Veldig sånn festejente. In J. B. Johannessen & K. Hagen (eds.), Språk i Oslo: Ny forskning omkring talespråk, 78–95, Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
2010. Bakgrunnsdeiksis og demonstrativer. In E. Magnusson Petzell, K. Jóhannesson, I. Larsson, S. -G. Malmgren, L. Rogström & E. Sköldberg (eds.), Bo6ß. Festskrift till Bo Ralph, 168–177, Göteborg: Meijerbergs institut för svensk etymologisk forskning, Göteborgs universitet.Google Scholar
Lundeby, E. 1965. Overbestemt substantiv i norsk og de andre nordiske språk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Lyons, C. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maw, J. 1999. Swahili for starters: a practical introductory course. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosegaard Hansen, M. -B. 2011. Negative cycles and grammaticalization. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, pages 570–579, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norde, M. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novelli, B. 1985. A grammar of the Karimojong language. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
Odden, D. A. 1996. The phonology and morphology of Kimatuumbi. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perridon, H. 1989. Reference, definiteness and the noun phrase in Swedish. . Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Proulx, P. 1988. The demonstrative pronouns of Proto-Algonquian. International journal of American linguistics 54(3).309–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raidt, E. H. 1993. Linguistic variants and language change: Deictic variants in some German and Dutch dialects vis-à-vis Afrikaans. In J. van Marle (ed.), Historical Linguistics 1991. Papers from the 10th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 281–294, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reh, M. 1985. Die Krongo-Sprache. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
Reinöhl, U. & N. P. Himmelmann 2017. Renewal: A figure of speech or a process sui generis? Language 93(2).381–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubino, C. 2013. Reduplication. In M. S. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Sohn, H. -M. 1999. The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, H. -R. 2010. Bengali: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Torp, A. 1919. Nynorsk etymologisk ordbok. Kristiania: H. Aschehoug & Co..Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, A. & V. Evans 2003. The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, J. 2009. The Jespersen cycles. In E. van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical change, 35–71, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, E. 2011. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vikør, L. 2001. The Nordic Languages: Their Status and Interrelations. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Vindenes, U. 2018. Complex Demonstratives and Cyclic Change in Norwegian. , Oslo: University of Oslo PhD thesis.Google Scholar
von der Gabelentz, G. 1901. Die Sprachwissenschaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Weigel Nachf..Google Scholar
Willis, D., C. Lucas & A. Breitbarth 2013. Comparing diachronies of negation. In D. Willis, C. Lucas & A. Breitbarth (eds.), The development of negation in the languages of Europe: Volume I Case studies, 1–50, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Miñana, Pau Martín
2023. L’evolució del demostratiu aqueix durant l’època moderna. In (De)bat a bat, DOI logo
Vulchanova, Mila, Jacqueline Collier, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes & Valentin Vulchanov
2023. Variation in first-generation L1 deictic systems: Language attrition and bilingualism effects. International Journal of Bilingualism 27:1 ► pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Kinn, Kari & Ida Larsson
2022. Pronominal demonstratives in homeland and heritage Scandinavian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 45:3 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Fang Wu
2020. Where do demonstratives come from?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:3 ► pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
2020. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Vulchanova, Mila, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, Jacqueline Collier & Valentin Vulchanov
2020. Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go?. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.