In my paper a universal aspect theory is presented which is based on the integration of the various types of states of affairs into the textual web of descriptions of situations and changes in situations. The states of affairs are thereby grouped according to their boundary characteristics. The grammatical meaning of the verbal aspect interacts with the lexical meaning of a given verb in group-specific ways, so that the kind of interaction in the case of a given aspect opposition can be used in order to classify verbs. In addition to the Slavic aspect opposition of perfective vs. imperfective, the aspectual systems of English, Modern Greek and the Romance languages are taken into consideration. The interaction between aspect and tense as well as the interaction within the aspect dimension itself, which plays a role if a language has more than one aspect category, is also discussed. The perfective imperfect and the imperfective aorist of Bulgarian are given as examples of problematic cases, along with the functions of the ing-form of the perfect in English. Generally the problem of the coming together of more than one aspect gram-meme in one verb form is solved by means of a hierarchization, which can be deduced from the particular interaction meaning in question. The grouping of verbs into aspect-sensitive semantic classes is only stable in the centre of the classes, but we find language-specific peculiarities on their peripheries. In addition, regroupings are also possible in the course of the development of a language.
2024. Zooming in on the semantics of French ingressives: a collostructional analysis. Journal of French Language Studies► pp. 1 ff.
Zuchewicz, Karolina
2024. Verifying the morpho-semantics of aspect via typological homogeneity. Linguistics Vanguard
Wiemer, Björn
2023. Between analytical mood and clause-initial particles – on the diagnostics of subordination for (emergent) complementizers. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 68:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Becker, Laura & Andrej Malchukov
2022. Semantic maps and typological hierarchies: Evidence for the Actionality Hierarchy. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Bogaards, Maarten
2022. The Discovery of Aspect: A Heuristic Parallel Corpus Study of Ingressive, Continuative and Resumptive Viewpoint Aspect. Languages 7:3 ► pp. 158 ff.
Mulder, Gijs, Gert-Jan Schoenmakers, Olaf Hoenselaar & Helen de Hoop
2022. Tense and Aspect in a Spanish Literary Work and Its Translations. Languages 7:3 ► pp. 217 ff.
Crane, Thera Marie, Johanna Nichols & Bastian Persohn
2021. Introduction: the role of the lexicon in actionality. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 74:3-4 ► pp. 427 ff.
Kolaković, Zrinka
2021. Factors contributing to prefixation of biaspectual verbs in Croatian. Russian Linguistics 45:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Polančec, Jurica
2021. Two-phase verbs: a crosslinguistic look at an actional class. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 74:3-4 ► pp. 467 ff.
2020. Causative verbs and event segmentation in Ewe. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi 16:3 ► pp. 1115 ff.
Croft, William & Meagan Vigus
2020. Event Causation and Force Dynamics in Argument Structure Constructions. In Perspectives on Causation [Jerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science, ], ► pp. 151 ff.
Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel & Pamela Faber
2020. What the analysis of extended meaning of terms can reveal about verb semantic frame structure. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Crane, Thera Marie & Bastian Persohn
2019. What’s in a Bantu verb? Actionality in Bantu languages. Linguistic Typology 23:2 ► pp. 303 ff.
Malchukov, Andrej
2018. Animacy shifts and resolution of semantic conflicts: A typological commentary on Shifting animacy by de Swart & de Hoop. Theoretical Linguistics 44:1-2 ► pp. 47 ff.
2014. Функции настоящего и имперфекта совершенного вида и перфекта несовершенного вида в молизско-славянском микроязыке. Scando-Slavica 60:2 ► pp. 322 ff.
Zuñiga, Fernando
2012. Dos Progresivos y dos Resultativos en el Mapudungun. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 1:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Sasse, H.-J.
2006. Aspect and Aktionsart. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 535 ff.
Tatevosov, Sergej
2003. The parameter of actionality. Linguistic Typology 6:3
Breu, Walter
2000. Zur Position des Slavischen in einer Typologie des Verbalaspekts (Form, Funktion, Ebenenhierarchie und lexikalische Interaktion). In Probleme der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt (ILA), ► pp. 21 ff.
Breu, Walter
2021. Actionality and the degree of temporal dynamics. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 74:3-4 ► pp. 435 ff.
Breu, Walter
2023. Aspektualität im Moliseslavischen und die Rolle des Sprachkontakts: ein vergleichender Überblick. In L’aspettualità nel contatto linguistico: lingue slave e oltre [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 53], ► pp. 37 ff.
Gardenghi, Monica
2000. Zur Frage der Kompatibilität der Aoristformen mit TSTA- und ISTA-Verbbedeutungen im Italienischen. In Probleme der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt (ILA), ► pp. 113 ff.
Mosel, Ulrike
2000. Aspect in Samoan. In Probleme der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt (ILA), ► pp. 179 ff.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
2000. Aspektsemantik und Lexikonorganisation im Cayuga. In Probleme der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt (ILA), ► pp. 193 ff.
Stoll, Sabine
1998. The role of Aktionsart in the acquisition of Russian aspect. First Language 18:54 ► pp. 351 ff.
Bickel, Balthasar
1997. Aspectual scope and the difference between logical and semantic representation. Lingua 102:2-3 ► pp. 115 ff.
Bickel, Balthasar
2000. Unlogischer Aspekt: zur Bedeutungsstruktur von Aspekt und Aktionsart, besonders im Belharischen. In Probleme der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt (ILA), ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
1997. References. In The Verb in Literary and Colloquial Arabic,
[no author supplied]
1998. References. In Verbal Periphrases in Romance,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.