Article published in:
Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages
Edited by Anetta Kopecka and Marine Vuillermet
[Studies in Language 45:1] 2021
► pp. 203234
References

References

Bourdin, Philippe
1997On goal-bias across languages: modal, configurational and orientational parameters. In Bohumil Palek (ed.), Proceedings of LP ‘96: Typology: prototypes, item orderings and universals, proceedings of the conference held in Prague, August 20–22, 1996, 185–216. Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar
Cáceres Arandia, Natalia
2011Grammaire fonctionnelle-typologique du ye’kwana, langue caribe du Venezuela. Lyon: Université Lyon 2 PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2014Documentation of Ye’kwana in the Erebato river in Venezuela. London: SOAS, Endangered Languages Archive. https://​elar​.soas​.ac​.uk​/Collection​/MPI154072 (Last access: 19 March 2020)
2017Syntactic sources for the development of a typologically unique property concepts class. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, San Antonio, July 31-August 4, 2017.
Derbyshire, Desmond C.
1999Carib. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Aleksandra Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 23–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoff, Berend J.
1968The Carib Language. Phonology, morphonology, morphology texts and word index. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko
1987‘Source’ vs. ‘Goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds.), Concept of case, 122–146. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Ishibashi, Miyuki, Anetta Kopecka & Marine Vuillermet
2006Trajectoire: Matériel visuel pour élicitation des données linguistiques. Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage (CNRS / Université Lyon 2): Fédération de Recherche en Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques, CNRS, France.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and cognition (Current studies in linguistics series 8). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Miyuki Ishibashi
2011L’(a)symétrie dans l’expression de la Source et du But: perspective translinguistique. Les Cahiers de Faits de Langues 3. 131–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis
2006Adpositions. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics. 2nd edn, 63–66. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meira, Sérgio
1999A grammar of Tiriyó. Houston, Texas: Rice University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio & Bruna Franchetto
2005The Southern Cariban languages and the Cariban family. International Journal of American Linguistics 71. 127–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papahagi, Cristiana
2011Pour une typologie des systèmes d’adnominaux de la trajectoire. Les Cahiers de Faits de Langues 3. 117–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapien, Racquel-María, Natalia Cáceres Arandia, Spike Gildea, & Sérgio Meira
to appear). Antipassive in the Cariban family. In Alena Witzlack-Makarevitz & Katarzyna Janic eds. Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions Typological Studies in Language Amsterdam John Benjamins Crossref
Slobin, Dan I.
1997Mind, code and text. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type, 437–468. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Ada Rohde
2004The Goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, 249–267. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolyn, René Dirven & Günter Radden
1999Putting concepts together: Syntax. In René Dirven & Marjolyn Verspoor (eds.), Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics, 79–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard & Fernando Zuñiga
2006Source-Goal (in)difference and the typology of motion events in the clause. STUF – Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59(3). 284–303.Google Scholar