Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:3 (2020) ► pp. 548605
Arellanes, Francisco
2009El sistema fonológico y las propiedades fonéticas del Zapoteco de San Pablo Güilá. Tlalpan: El Colegio de México Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
2016Primitivos tonales y patrones tonales en el zapoteco de San Pablo Güilá: divergencias inesperadas entre nombres y verbos. Paper presented at Coloquio de Lenguas Otomangues y Vecinas VII, 7–10 April 2016.
Arkadiev, Peter
2008Thematic roles, event structure, and argument encoding in semantically aligned languages. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 101–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Avelino, Heriberto, John Foreman, Pamela Munro & Aaron Sonnenschein
2004Covert subjects in Zapotecan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of SSILA, Boston, MA, 8–11 January 2004.
Beam de Azcona, Rosemary
2004A Coatlán-Loxicha Zapotec Grammar. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
2019Southern Zapotec Verb Classes. In Mathew Baerman, Timothy Feist & Enrique Palancar (eds.), Inflectional complexity and verb classes: A view from the Oto-Manguean languages of Mexico. Amerindia 411: 121–166.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew & Greville Corbett
2012Stem alternations and multiple exponence. Word Structure 51. 52–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickmore, Lee & George A. Broadwell
1998High tone docking in Sierra Juarez Zapotec. International Journal of American Linguistics 641. 37–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Elinor
1961Mitla Zapotec grammar. México City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano and Centro de Investigaciones Antropólogicas de México.Google Scholar
Butler, Inez M.
1976Reflexive constructions of Yatzachi Zapotec. International Journal of American Linguistics 421. 331–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Eric
2011Zenzontepec Chatino aspect morphology and Zapotecan verb classes. International Journal of American Linguistics 77(2). 219–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Valency classes in Zenzontepec Chatino. In Andrey Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, vol. 21, 1391–1426. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coveney, Aiden
2000Vestiges of nous and the 1st person plural verb in informal spoken French. Language Sciences 221. 447–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan
1973Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of Linguistics 91. 11–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curnow, Timothy Jowan
2002Conjunct/disjunct marking in Awa Pit. Linguistics 40(3). 611–627. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1985Agentivity and syntax. In William H. Eilfort, Paul D. Kroeber & Karen L. Peterson (eds.), Papers from the parasession on causatives and agentivity at the 21st regional meeting, 1–12.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1979Ergativity. Language 551. 59–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection, Language 67(3). 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
1985Suppletion in word formation, In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical semantics – historical word-formation, 97–112. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
1992The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 681. 81–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1968The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Foley, William & Robert Van Valin
1984Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, Ambrocio
2014Construcciones de verbos seriales en el zapoteco de Teotitlán del valle. Mexico City: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social MA thesis.Google Scholar
2017Verbal classes in Teotitlán del Valle Zapotec: From a comparative perspective. Paper presented at the Workshop on American Indian Languages 20, May 12 2017, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Foreman, John
2006The Morphosyntax of Subjects in Macuiltianguis Zapotec. Los Angeles: UCLA Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin
1980Person markers: finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Ronald. L. Trail (ed.), Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics No.7. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. 95–106.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1977Some functional relationships in grammar. Language 51(1). 89–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Sandra Thompson
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 561. 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Jeri
1983The fortis/lenis question: Evidence from Zapotec and Jawoñ. Journal of Phonetics 111. 177–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence
1989The phonology and morphology of Zapotec verbs. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1976Towards a universal definition of “subject”. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject & topic, 303–333. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Felicia A.
1999Antisymmetry and the Syntax of San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec. Los Angeles: UCLA Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Li, Charles & Sandra Thompson
1976Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject & topic, 459–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
López Cruz, Ausencia
1997Morfología verbal del zapoteco de San Pablo Güilá. Mexico City: Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia BA thesis.Google Scholar
López Nicolás, Oscar
2016Estudios de la fonología y gramática del zapoteco de Zoochina. Mexico City: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Marlett, Steve
2010Personal pronouns: Distribution. Cheryl A. Black, H. Andrew Black & Stephen A. Marlett (eds.), The Zapotec grammar files, SIL International. Unpublished manuscript. Available at: https://​www​.sil​.org​/resources​/archives​/35298 (Last access 10 April 2020).
Mel’čuk, Igor
1976On suppletion. Linguistics 1701. 45–90.Google Scholar
Merrifield, William R.
1968Palantla Chinantec grammar (Papeles de la Chinantla 5, Serie científica 5). México City: Museo Nacional de Antropología.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1991Active/agentive case marking and its motivations. Language 60(3). 510–546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela
2006Modal expression in Valley Zapotec. In William Frawley (ed.), The expression of modality, 177–209. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007A definite mystery. Berkeley Linguistic Society 33(2). 91–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Valence alternation in the Tlacolula Valley Zapotec lexicon. In Natalie Operstein & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Valence changes in Zapotecan: Synchrony, diachrony, typology, 73–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela, Brook Danielle Lillehaugen & Felipe H. Lopez
2007–2008Cali Chiu? A course in Valley Zapotec. New York, NY: lulupress.Google Scholar
Nakamoto, Shun
2016The morphology of person in Temalacayuca Popoloca (Ngiwa). Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies BA thesis.Google Scholar
Nellis, Donald G. & Barbara E. Hollenbach
1980Fortis versus lenis in Cajonos Zapotec phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics 461. 92–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Operstein, Natalie
2002First-person plural and the aspect morphology of Zapotec. In Jeanie Castillo (ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Annual Workshop on the American Indigenous Languages, Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, 53–64. Santa Barbra, CA: University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
2017Suppletion in Zapotec. Linguistics 55(4). 739–782. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Operstein, Natalie & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein
(eds.) 2014Valence changes in Zapotecan: Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Brill’s Studies in the Indigenous Languages of the Americas. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique
2008Emergence of active/stative alignment in Otomi. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 357–379. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palancar, Enrique & Timothy Feist
2015Agreeing with subjects in number: The rare split of Amuzgo inflection. Linguistic Typology 19(3). 337–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Báez, Gabriela
2014Morphological valence-changing processes in Diidza Za. In Natalie Operstein & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Valence change in Zapote: Synchrony, diachrony, typology, 103–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pérez-Báez, Gabriela & Terrence Kaufman
2016Verb classes in Juchitán Zapotec. Anthropological Linguistics 58(3). 217–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L.
1948Tonemic perturbations in Mazateco, with special emphasis on tonemic fusion. In Chapter VIII of Tone languages: A Technique for Determining the Number and Type of Pitch Contrasts in a Language, with Studies in Tonemic Substitution and Fusion, 95–165. (University of Michigan Publications in Linguistics, No.4) Ann Arbor: U. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1985Passives and related constructions. Language 611. 821–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies [New Jersey: Humanities Press].Google Scholar
Smith-Stark, Thomas
2000Primera persona plural. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
2002Las clases verbales del zapoteco de Chichicapan. In Las actas del VI Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste. Memorias, Hermosillo, Universidad de Sonora, vol. 21, 165–212. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
Smith-Stark, Thomas & Fernín Tapia García
2002El amuzgo como lengua activa. In Paulette Levy (ed.), Del cora al maya yucateco: estudios linguísticos sobre algunas lenguas indígenas mexicanas, 81–129. Mexico City: UNAM.Google Scholar
Suárez, Jorge A.
1983La lengua tlapaneca de Malinaltepec. México City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Thompson, Chad
1996The Na-Dene middle voice: an impersonal source of the D-element. International Journal of American Linguistics 621. 351–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uchihara, Hiroto
2016Tone and registrogenesis in Quiaviní Zapotec. Diachronica 33(2). 220–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uchihara, Hiroto & Ambrocio Gutiérrez
2019El texto Don Crescencio: ilustración del sistema tonal del zapoteco de Teotitlán del Valle. Tlalocan XXIV1. 127–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D.
1990Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66(2). 221–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert
2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert & Randy LaPolla
1997Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Villard, Stéphanie
2015The phonology and morphology of Zacatepec Eastern Chatino. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren
2008The study of semantic alignment: retrospect and state of the art. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 3–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Case relations in Tlapanec, a head-marking language. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, 797–807. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zubin, David
1979Discourse function of morphology: the focus system in German. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Discourse and syntax, 469–504. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Uchihara, Hiroto & Ambrocio Gutiérrez
2020. Teotitlán Zapotec: An ‘activizing’ language. Linguistic Typology 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.