Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:2 (2020) ► pp. 461499
References

References

Adhikari, Sujan Raj, Gopi Baysal, Amod Dixit, Stacey S. Martin, Mattieu Landes, Remy Bossu, & Susan E. Hough
2017Toward a unified near-field intensity map of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 33(S1). S21–S34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2018Evidentiality: The Basics. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 1–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K.
2004Grammar and cultural practices: The grammaticalization of triadic communication in West African languages. Journal of West African Languages 30(2). 5–28.Google Scholar
Banfield, Anne
1973Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of Language 10(1). 1–39.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2003Referential density in discourse and syntactic typology. Language 79(4). 708–736. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Bernard Comrie & Martin Haspelmath
2008The Leipzig Glossing Rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme by morpheme glosses. www​.eva​.mpg​.de​/lingua​/resources​/glossing​-rules (Last access: 6 February 2020)
Bond, Oliver, Kristine Hildebrandt & Dubi N. Dhakal
2015Conditions on differential ergative case marking. Poster presented at the 89th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Portland, OR, January 8–11, 2015.
Bond, Oliver & Kristine Hildebrandt
2013Optional ergative case marking: what can be expressed by its absence? Paper presented at the 10th biennial Meeting of Association for Linguistic Typology, Leipzig, August 15–18, 2013.
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2014Quotatives: New trends and sociolinguistic implications. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chappel, Hilary
2012Say in Sinitic: from Verba Dicendi to attitudinal discourse markers. In Johan van der Auwera & Jan Nuyts (eds.), Grammaticalization and (inter-)subjectification, 81–110. Wetteren: Universa Press.Google Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana & Gwendolyn Hyslop
2011Introduction to special issue on optional case marking in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34(2). 1–7.Google Scholar
Childs, Geoff, Sienna Craig, Duni Nanda Dhakal, Mark Donohue & Kristine Hildebrandt
2017Narrating disaster through participatory research: Perspectives from post-earthquake Nepal. Collaborative Anthropologies 10(1). 207-236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra
2015Quotation and advances in understanding syntactic systems. Annual Review of Linguistics 1(1). 43–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 494 ]
DeLancey, Scott
1991Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3). 289–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Relativization and nominalization in Bodic. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 28(2). 55–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Evidentiality in Tibetic. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 580–594. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Guy
2011The grammaticalization of quotatives. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 646–655. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dhakal, Dubi Nanda
2018A Nubri lexicon. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Ding, Picus
2014A grammar of Prinmi. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Dubi Nanda Dhakal
2016A Tsum lexicon. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, Regine
2012Particles as speaker indexicals in free indirect discourse. Sprache und Datenverarbeitung 35–36. 99–109.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2012Some problems in the typology of quotation: a canonical approach. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 66–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Simeon, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila San Roque
2018Egophoricity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Edward
2001Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. Los Angeles: University of. California Los Angeles PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren
(collector) 2009 Kagate (Nepal) (SUY1). Digital collection managed by PARADISEC [Open Access]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Lamjung Yolmo copulas in use: evidentiality, reported speech and questions. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2015The reported speech evidential particle in Lamjung Yolmo. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38(2). 292–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016aA sketch grammar of Lamjung Yolmo. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2016bReported speech evidentiality in Tibeto-Burman languages. Paper presented at the Workshop on Typological Profiles of Language Families of South Asia. Uppsala: September 15–16, 2016.
Gawne, Lauren, Barbara F. Kelly, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Tyler Heston
2017Putting practice into words: The state of data and methods transparency in grammatical descriptions. Language Documentation & Conservation 11: 157–189.Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
2017Reported speech evidentiality in corpora of earthquake narratives in Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal. Paper presented at the Association for Linguistic Typology 12, Canberra, December 11–15, 2017.
Gawne, Lauren. & Nathan W. Hill
(eds.) 2017Evidential systems of Tibetan languages. Berlin/Boston: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol
2005The participial construction of Dolakhā Newar: syntactic implications of an Asian converb. Studies in Language 29(1). 35–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007A grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The tapestry of Dolakha Newar: Chaining, embedding, and the complexity of sentences. Linguistic Typology 15(1): 5–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 495 ]
Güldemann, Tom
2008Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hari, Anna Maria
2010Yohlmo Sketch Grammar. Kathmandu: Ekta books.Google Scholar
Haßler, Gerda
2002Evidentiality and reported speech in Romance languages. In: Tom Güldemann & Manfred von Roncador (eds.), Reported discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistic domains, 143–172. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1989Layers and operators in functional grammar. Journal of Linguistics 25. 127–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
2004A grammar and glossary of the Manange language. In Carol Genetti (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal: Manange and Sherpa, 1–192. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A. & Oliver Bond
2017Manange. In Randy J. LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (2nd edn), 516–533. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A., Tanner Burge-Beckley, & Jacob Sebok
2019Language documentation in the aftermath of the 2015 Nepal earthquakes: A guide to two archives and a web exhibit. Language Documentation & Conservation 13. 618–651.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2012Genre and discourse analysis in language for specific purposes. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2016Complementation in Japhug. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area 39(2). 222–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
2018Pragmatic functions of gestures: Some observations on the history of their study and their nature. Gesture 16(2): 157–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
1995“Ergative” marking in Tibeto-Burman. In Yoshio Nishi, James A. Matisoff & Yasuhiko Nagano (eds.), New horizons in Tibeto-Burman morphosyntax, 189–228. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Hedda & Hans Sloetjes
2009Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 41(3). 841–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N.
1986Direct and indirect speech: A functional study. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 29–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1968Theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, Emar
2015Quotation and unquotation in free indirect discourse. Mind & Language 30(3). 345–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, Terrie & George Yule
1994Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes 18(1). 63–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazaudon, Martine
2017Tamang. In Randy J. LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (2nd edn), 468–493. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGregor, William B.
1994The grammar of reported speech and thought in Gooniyandi. Australian Journal of Linguistics 14(1). 63–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Semiotic grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 496 ]
2008Complementation as interpersonal grammar. WORD 59(1–2). 25–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective. Lingua 120. 1610–1636. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Lev
2012Nanti self-quotation: Implications for the pragmatics of reported speech and evidentiality. Pragmatics and Society 3(2). 321–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mushin, Ilana
2001Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative retelling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana
2012Personal deixis and reported discourse: towards a typology of person alignment. Linguistic Typology. 16(2). 233–263.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
2006Grammar writing for a grammar-reading audience. Studies in Language 30(2). 351–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Nominalization in Bodic languages. In María José Lópes-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization: New perspectives, 219–273. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
2017Nar-Phu. In Randy J. LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (2nd edn), 534–556. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Owen-Smith, Thomas
2014Grammatical relations in Tamang, a Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal. London: SOAS PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Prakash, Rajesh, Ravi Kant Singh & H. N. Srivastava
2016Nepal earthquake 25 April 2015: source parameters, precursory pattern and hazard assessment. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 7(6). 1769–1784. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reesink, Ger P.
1993“Inner speech” in Papuan languages. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 24. 217–25.Google Scholar
Rumsey, Alan
1982An intra-sentence grammar of Ungarinjin, North-Western Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2010‘Optional’ ergativity and the framing of reported speech. Lingua 120(7). 1652–1676. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
San Roque, Lila & Robin Loughnane
2012The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 16. 111–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, Anju
1988On syntactic convergence: the case of the verb “say” in Tibeto-Burman. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1988), 375–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
SIL International & HIS Nepal
(eds.) 2016Syuba – Nepali – English dictionary. Kathmandu: SIL International and HIS Nepal.Google Scholar
So-Hartmann, Helga
2009A descriptive grammar of Daai Chin. Berkeley: University of California PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Spronck, Stef
2016Evidential fictive interaction (in Ungarinyin and Russian). In Esther Pascual & Sergeiy Sandler (eds.), The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction, 255–275. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Defenestration: Deconstructing the frame-in relation in Ungarinyin. Journal of Pragmatics 114. 104–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
1996L’Ergativite en tibetain: approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlee. Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
[ p. 497 ]
2008Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek, Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier, 281–308. Saale: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
2014The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics, historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 105–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2017A typological sketch of evidential/epistemic categories in the Tibetic languages. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 95–130. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Randy J. LaPolla
2014Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2). 240–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2004Deixis and grounding in speech and thought representation. Journal of Pragmatics 36(3). 489–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2011The functions of represented speech and thought in Umpithamu narratives. Australian Journal of Linguistics 31(4). 491–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Voort, Hein van der
2002The quotative construction in Kwaza and its (de-) grammaticalisation. In Mily Crevels, Simon van de Kerke, Sérgio Meira & Hein van der Voort (eds.), Current studies on South American languages. Indigenous languages of Latin America 3, 307–328. Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS).Google Scholar
Webster, Jeff
1992A socio-linguistic survey of the Tibeto-Burman dialects of North Gorkha District, Nepal. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Widmer, Manuel
2014A descriptive grammar of Bunan. Bern: University of Bern PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas
1988 ‘A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality.’ Studies in Language 12. 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zemp, Marius
2017Evidentiality in Purik Tibetan. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 261–296. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Chelliah, Shobhana L.
2021.  In Why Language Documentation Matters [SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, ],  pp. 41 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.