Article published in:
Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages
Edited by Anetta Kopecka and Marine Vuillermet
[Studies in Language 45:1] 2021
► pp. 3674
Bisang, Walter
1995Verb serialization and converbs-differences and similarities. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective: structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms – adverbial participles, gerunds, 137–188. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1996Areal Typology and Grammaticalization: Processes of Grammaticalization Based on Nouns and Verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian Languages. Studies in Language 201.519–597. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bon, Noëllie
2014Une grammaire de la langue stieng : langue en danger du Cambodge et du Vietnam. Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Borillo, Andrée
1998L’espace et son expression en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Bourdin, Philippe
1997On goal-bias across languages: modal, configurational and orientational parameters. In Palek, Bohumil (ed.), Proceedings of LP ‘96: Typology: prototypes, item orderings and universals, proceedings of the conference held in Prague, August 20–22, 1996, 185–216. Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa, Marianne Gullberg, Asifa Majid & Bhuvana Narasimhan
2004Put project: The cross-linguistic encoding of placement events. In Asifa Majid (ed.), Field Manual, vol 91, 10–24. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa & Stephen C. Levinson
2001Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David
2007aLanguages of Mainland Southeast Asia. In Osahito Miyaoka, Osamu Sakiyama & Michael E. Krauss (eds.), The vanishing languages of the Pacific rim. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007bLanguage endangerment in China and Mainland Southeast Asia. In Matthias Brenzinger (ed.), Language diversity endangered (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 181), 278–302. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas
2012The linguistic encoding of placement and removal events in Jahai. In Anetta Kopecka, & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 21–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1975Eliciting narratives through a film: Pear Stories. http://​chafe​.faculty​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/pearfilm​.htm (Last access: 10 April 2020)
1980The Pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood: ABLEX publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2006Syntaxe générale une introduction typologique 2: la phrase. Hermes Science Publications.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2005Adpositions as a non-universal category. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, 185–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
General Statistics Office of Viet Nam
Fortis, Jean-Michel, Colette Grinevald, Anetta Kopecka & Alice Vittrant
2011L’expression de la trajectoire : perspectives typologiques. Faits de Langues 31. (Les Cahiers). 33–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fortis, Jean-Michel & Alice Vittrant
2011L’organisation morpho-syntaxique de l’expression de la trajectoire : vers une typologie des constructions. Faits de Langues 31. (Les Cahiers). 71–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grinevald, Colette
2011On constructing a working typology of the expression of path. Faits de Langues 31. (Les Cahiers). 43–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. & Stephen C. Levinson
1996Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko
1987Source vs. Goal: a case of linguistic dissymetry. In René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds.), Concepts of case, 122–146. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Imbert, Caroline
2008Dynamique des systèmes et motivations fonctionnelles dans l’encodage de la Trajectoire. Description typologique du grec homérique et du vieil-anglais. Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Ishibashi, Miyuki
2010The (a)symmetry of source and goal in motion events in Japanese: Evidence from narrative data. In Giovanna Marotta, Alessandro Lenci, Linda Meini & Francesco Rovai (eds.), Space in language: Proceedings of the Pisa International Conference, 515–531. Pisa: PDE.Google Scholar
2012The expression of ‘putting’ and ‘taking’ events in Japanese: The asymmetry of Source and Goal revisited. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Events of ‘putting’ and ‘taking’: A crosslinguistic perspective, 253–272. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishibashi, Miyuki, Anetta Kopecka & Marine Vuillermet
2006Trajectoire: matériel visuel pour élicitation des données linguistiques. Paris: Fédération de Recherche en Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques.Google Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Miyuki Ishibashi
2011L’(a)symétrie dans l’expression de la Source et du But: perspective translinguistique. Faits de Langues 31. (Les Cahiers). 131–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau
2005Starting at the end: the importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 961. 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N., et Sandra A. Thompson
1981Mandarin Chinese: a Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
1976Subject and Topic: a new Typology of Language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York. Academic Press.Google Scholar
1974Co-verbs in Mandarin Chinese: Verbs or prepositions? Journal of Chinese Linguistics 21. 257–278.Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer
1969Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
National Institute of Statistics, Ministry of Planning
2007General Population Census of Cambodia, 2008: enumerator manual. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. http://​camnut​.weebly​.com​/uploads​/2​/0​/3​/8​/20389289​/2009​_census​_2008​.pdf (Last access: 28 March 2020).
Papahagi, Cristina
2011Pour une typologie des systèmes d’adnominaux de la trajectoire. Faits de Langues 31. (Les Cahiers). 117–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Regier, Terry & Mingyu Zheng
2007Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 311. 705–719. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sidwell, Paul
2009Classifying the Austroasiatic languages: history and state of the art. München: Lincom Europa Publishers.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative, vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates – Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Stathis Selimis
2002, Motion verbs + manner, linguist list issue 13.899, https://​linguistlist​.org​/issues​/13​/13​-899/ (last access: 11/12/2020)Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley
1985Relator Nouns as a Source of Case Inflection. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 201. 111–133.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Ada Rohde
2004The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Güter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, 249–267. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
1986On the evolutionary paths of locative expressions. Berkeley Linguistics Society 121. 515–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994The grammar of space. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard A.
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich & Schmid, Hans-Jörg
1996An Introduction to cognitive linguistics. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Vandeloise, Claude
1986L’espace en français : sémantiques des prépositions spatiales. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan, Peerapat Yangklang, Sven Stromqvist & Ludo Verhoeven
2004A third way to travel: The place of Thai (and other serial verb languages) in motion event typology. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative, vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives, 159–190. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates – Psychology Press.Google Scholar