Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 43:4 (2019) ► pp. 850895
References

References

Aarts, Bas
2004Modelling linguistic gradience. Studies in Language 28(1). 1–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Syntactic gradience: The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Abbi, Anvita
1975Reduplication in Hindi: A generative semantic study. Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
1977Reduplicated adverbs in Hindi. Indian Linguistics 38(3). 125–135.Google Scholar
1980Semantic grammar of Hindi: A study of reduplication. New Delhi: Bahri Publications Private Ltd.Google Scholar
1992Reduplication in South Asian languages: An areal, typological and historical study. New Delhi: Allied Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2003A grammar of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexandrova, Anna
2016 “Narrowly averted and partially completed events in the languages of Europe and beyond.” Talk presented at the 49th Annual Conference of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE) conference in Naples, Italy, 2016.
Angelo, Denise & Eva Schultze-Berndt
2016Beware bambai – lest it be apprehensive. In Felicity Meakins & Carmel O’Shannessy (eds.), Loss and renewal: Australian languages since contact, 255–296. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter
1981A grammar of Diyari, South Australia. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1961Generality, gradience and the all-or-none. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bond, Oliver
2011Negation in clause linkages. Language Documentation and Description 9. 77–120.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Östen Dahl
1989The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13–1. 51–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 892 ]
Chumakina, Marina
2013Periphrasis in Archi. In Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Periphrasis: The role of syntax and morphology in paradigms (Proceedings of the British Academy 180), 27–52. Oxford: British Academy and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1981Language universals and linguistic typology: syntax and morphology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1985Tense. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coupe, Alexander
2007A grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2007Beyond Aristotle and gradience: A reply to Aarts. Studies in Language 31. 409–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan
1986Lexical semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
2015Tense, aspect, mood and evidentiality. In James D. Wright (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. 210–213. Amsterdam: Elsevier https://​www​.sciencedirect​.com​/science​/article​/pii​/B97800​80970​86852025X (accessed 14th October 2017). Crossref
Denison, David
2006Category change and gradience in the determiner system. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 279–304. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Category change in English with and without structural change. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalisation, 105–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dench, Alan
1988Complex sentences in Martuthunira. In Peter Austin (ed.), Complex sentence constructions in Australian languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1997The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1980The languages of Australia. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2002Australian languages. Their nature and development (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1979Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht, London: D. Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2006Descriptive theories, explanatory theories and basic linguistic theory. In Felix Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing, 207–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience
2008A Grammar of Hup (MGL 43). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
1995A grammar of Kayardild: With Historical-comparative Notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicolas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nicolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L.
1986Pirahã. In D. C. Derbyshire & G. K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. 1, 200–325. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 893 ]
Ferreira, Helder P.
2015The expression of counterfactuality in Yanomama. Paper presented at the Workshop on Counterfactuality, Radboud University, Nijmegen, July 2015.
Fleck, David
2003A grammar of Matsés. Houston: Rice University dissertation.Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine
2006Aspects of modality. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1980Hua. A Papuan language of the Eastern Highlands of New Guinea. Studies in Language Companion Series 5. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Inconsequential clauses in Hua and the typology of clauses. In John Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 49–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2007Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11. 119–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010aComparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86. 663–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bFramework-free grammatical theory. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammatical analysis, 341–365. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1992Grammaticalization chains. Studies in Language 16(2). 335–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994aOn the genesis of aspect in African languages, the proximative. Paper presented at the annual meeting of BLS, Berkeley. Crossref
1994bGrammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109), 255–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991Grammaticalization: a conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
1995 “The Proximative”. Paper presented at the Fourth ICLA conference in Albuquerque, USA, July 1995.
2002On the evolution of grammatical forms. In Alison Wray (ed.), The transition to language, 376–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006The changing languages of Europe. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine
2000The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 231–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jendraschek, Gerd
2014Future tense, prospective aspect, and irrealis mood as part of the situation perspective: Insights from Basque, Turkish and Papuan. In Philippe de Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine & Saghie Sharifzadeh (eds.), Future times, future tenses, 138–64. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jensen, Cheryl
1998Comparative Tupí-Guaraní morphosyntax. In Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. 4, 489–618. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ježek, Elisabetta & Paolo Ramat
2009On parts-of-speech transcategorization. Folia Linguistica 43. 391–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 894 ]
De Jong, Jan Willem
1977The Tun-huang manuscripts of the Tibetan Rāmāyaṇa story. Indo-Iranian Journal 19. 37–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, Geoffrey D. with the assistance of Bel Abbey, Nora Abbey, Martha John, Ed John & Ruth Poncho
1991Koasati grammar. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
König, Christa
1993Aspekt im Maa (AMO, Afrikanische Monographien 3). Cologne: University of Cologne Press.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania
1998On identifying an evasive gram: Action narrowly averted. Studies in Language 22(1). 113–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000TAM-auxiliation and the avertive category in Northeast Europe. In Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest (ed.), Areal grammaticalization. Louvain-Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
2001Areal grammaticalization: The case of the Bantu-Nilotic borderland. Folia Linguistica XXXIV 3–4. 267–283.Google Scholar
2009Grammatical categories and linguistic theory: Elaborateness in grammar. In Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, Monik Charette, David Nathan & Peter Sells (eds.), Proceedings of conference on language documentation and linguistic theory 2. London: SOAS.Google Scholar
2010Grammaticalization and the evolution of grammar: On one particular kind of grammatical categories. In Young-Se Kang, Jong-Yuri Yoon, Jongseon Hong, Jiun-Shiung Wu, Seongha Rhee, Kyoung-Ae Kim, Dong-Ho Choi, Kee-Ho Kim & Hye-Kyung Kang (eds.), Lectures on universal grammar and individual languages (SICOL-2010), 144–156. Hankookmunhwasa: Seoul.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019World lexicon of grammaticalization. Second extensively revised and updated edition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja & Suzanne Romaine
2005‘We had like to have been killed by thunder and lightning’. The semantic and pragmatic history of a construction that like to disappeared. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6(1). 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987Nouns and verbs. Language 63(1). 53–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lapolla, Randy
2016On categorization: Stick to the facts of the languages. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 365–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1995Apprehensional epistemics. In Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischmann (eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse (Typological Studies in Language 32), 293–327. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L.
2004Towards a semantic typology of adversative and contrast marking. Semantics 21(2). 177–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mcgregor, William
1990A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Marion
1999Desano grammar: Studies in the languages of Colombia 6. Arlington: SIL/ University of Texas.Google Scholar
Mueller, Neele
2013Tense, aspect, modality and evidentiality marking in South American indigenous languages. Utrecht: University of Utrecht dissertation.Google Scholar
Overall, Simon
2017A typology of frustrative marking in Amazonian languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert W. Dixon (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 477–512. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
2007Mood and modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir
2001Antirezultativ: do I posle rezultata. In Vladimir Plungian (ed.), Glagol’nye kategorii, 50–88. Moscow: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
[ p. 895 ]
Poulos, G.
1990A linguistic study of Venda. Pretoria: via Afrika, Maskew.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo
1999Linguistic categories and linguists’ categorizations. Linguistics 37(1). 157–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Degrammaticalization or transcategorization? In Chris Schaner-Wolles, John Rennison & Friedrich Neubarth (eds.), Naturally! Linguistic studies in honour of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler presented on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 393–401. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan
2009On the (un)suitability of semantic categories. Linguistic Typology 13 (2009), 95–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Susan
1999The grammaticalization of the proximative in Tok Pisin. Language 75(2). 322–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Sluijs, Robbert
2015Counterfactuality in Virgin Islands Dutch Creole (Negerhollands). Paper presented at the Workshop on Counterfactuality, Radboud University, Nijmegen, July 2015.
Smith, Ellen L.
2015A grammar of Papapana, with an investigation into language contact and endangerment. Callaghan, AUS: University of Newcastle dissertation. http://​nova​.newcastle​.edu​.au​/vital​/access​/manager​/Repository​/uon:16705​?queryType​=vitalDismax​&query​=ellen+smith+papapana
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
(eds.) 2010Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalisation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2005The semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: The non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia. Linguistic Typology 9. 223–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinogradov, V. V.
1972Russkij Jazyk: Grammatičeskoe učenie o slove, 2nd edn. Moscow.Google Scholar
Vuillermet, Marine
2012A Grammar of Ese’eja, a Takanan language of the Bolivian Amazon. Lyon: University of Lyon dissertation.Google Scholar
. forthcoming. The apprehensional domain: a typology of grammatical(ized) ‘fear’-morphemes.
Zester, Laura
2010The semantics of avoidance and its morphosyntactic expression: Australian languages vs. English. Dusseldorf: University of Dusseldorf thesis.Google Scholar
. forthcoming. Towards a grammar of counterfactuality and its implications for emotive functions: The Avertive, Frustrative and Apprehensional category.
Ziegeler, Debra
2000What almost can reveal about counterfactual inferences. Journal of Pragmatics 32(12). 1743–1776. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 896 ]