Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:1 (2020) ► pp.70–94

Concernee-Concern constructions

A comparative study of external possession in the Bantu languages

ORCID logo | LLACAN (CNRS - INaLCO/USPC)
This paper provides an analysis of the phenomenon commonly known as external possession in the Bantu languages. On the basis of comparative data, I argue for a prototype approach to the intricate problem of determining the conditions of use of such constructions, which I rename Concernee-Concern constructions, introducing two new terms for the thematic roles involved. Situations can be expressed by means of Concernee-Concern construction if they correspond to the prototypical situation that involves somebody’s body part being affected by an action, or if they show a family resemblance to this situation. I argue against the relevance of alienability. The paper also provides a formal typology of Concernee-Concern constructions in the Bantu languages.
Keywords: external possession, Bantu, alienability, prototypicality, applicative suffix
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Two construction-specific roles: Concernee and Concern
  • 3.Body parts are relevant, not (in)alienability
  • 4.The prototypical situation
  • 5.Formal variation in Bantu Concernee-Concern constructions
    • 5.1Presence or absence of an applicative suffix
    • 5.2Mapping of the Concernee and Concern roles onto object relations
    • 5.3The Concern or Concernee is mapped onto the subject relation
    • 5.4Presence of a possessive pronoun co-referential with the Concernee
    • 5.5Recursivity
  • 6.Concernees without Concerns?
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • Bibliography
Published online: 6 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18059.vel
References (32)
Bibliography
Bickford, J. Albert. 1986. Possessor Ascension in Kinyarwanda. Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 221, 129–143.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Syntaxe générale. Une introduction typologique (Langues et Syntaxe). Vol. 21. Paris: Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Davies, William D. 1997. Relational succession in Kinyarwanda possessor ascension. Lingua 1011. 89–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna. 1999. Mapping possessors: parameterizing the external possession construction. In Doris Payne & Immanuel Barshi (eds.), External Possession. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Nadine. in preparation. A grammar of Gyeli.
Henderson, Brent. 2014. External possession in Chimwiini. Journal of Linguistics 50(2). 297–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinnebusch, Thomas J. & Robert S. Kirsner. 1980. On the Inference of ”Inalienable Possession“ in Swahili. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 2(1). 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hole, Daniel. 2006. Extra argumentality – affectees, landmarks, and voice. Linguistics 44(2). 383–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1977. The syntax of body parts. In Ernest Rugwa Byarushengo, Alessandro Duranti & Larry M. Hyman (eds.), Haya Grammatical Structure: phonology, grammar, discourse (Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguisics 6), 99–117. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
1996. The syntax of body parts in Haya. The Grammar of Inalienability A Typological Perspective on Body Part Terms and the Part-Whole Relation. Reprint 2011. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawasha, Boniface K. 2003. Lunda Grammar: A Morphosyntactic and Semantic Analysis. Eugene: University of Oregon dissertation.Google Scholar
2008. Relative clauses and subject inversion in Chokwe, Kaonde, Lunda and Luvale. Africana Linguistica XIV1. 37–61.Google Scholar
Keach, Camillia N. & Michael Rochemont. 1992. On the Syntax of Possessor Raising in Swahili. Studies in African Linguistics 231. 81–106.Google Scholar
Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. University of California Press. A location of publication is missing here.Google Scholar
Kutsch Lojenga, Constance. 2003. Bila (D32). In Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson (eds.), The Bantu Languages (Routledge Language Family Series 4), 450–474. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kyei-Mensah, Josephine. 1998. Inalienable possession : an aspect of the syntax of personal reference in Swahili. SOAS University of London dissertation. [URL]
Nichols, Johanna & Balthasar Bickel. 2013. Possessive Classification. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (19 October, 2017).
Payne, Doris & Immanuel Barshi. 1999. External Possession: What, Where, How and Why. In Doris Payne & Immanuel Barshi (eds.), External Possession (Typological Studies in Language 39), 3–29. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, Ronald P. 1995. On the discourse functions of possessor movement in Emai prose narratives. In Pamela Downing & Michael Noonan (eds.), Word Order in Discourse (Typological Studies in Language 30), 487–515. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schrock, Terrill B. 2007. Syntactic exorcism: toward an LFG analysis of Swahili ‘external possession.’ GIALens 1(3). a page number range is missing here.Google Scholar
Scotton, Carol M. 1981. Extending Inalienable Possession: The Argument for an Extensive Case in Swahili. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3(2). 159–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A. 2016. External possession and constructions that may have it. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 69(1). 131–169.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1994. An integrational approach to possessor raising, ethical datives and adversative passives. In Susanne Gahl, Andy Dolbey & Christopher Johnson (eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 461–486. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Simango, Silvester R. 2007. Enlarged arguments in Bantu: Evidence from Chichewa. Lingua (117). 928–949. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R. 2014. The mental corpus: how language is represented in the mind (Oxford Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Mark. 2008. A Grammar of Eton. (Mouton Grammar Library 46). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velde, Mark van de. to appear. Adnominal possession. In Ellen Hurst, Nancy Kula, Lutz Marten & Jochen Zeller (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Bantu Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. (in preparation). Dictionnaire ìtón-français.
Velde, Mark van de & Odette Ambouroue. 2017. The origin and use of a relative clause construction that targets objects in Orungu (Bantu, Gabon). Studies in Language 41(3). 615–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voeltz, Erhard F. K. 1976. Inalienable possession in Sotho. Studies in African Linguistics Supplement 61. 255–266.Google Scholar
Voll, Rebecca. 2017. A Grammar of Mundabli, A Bantoid (Yemne-Kimbi) language of Cameroon. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen. 2012. Object marking in isiZulu. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30(2). 219–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Creissels, Denis
2024. Transitivity, Valency, and Voice, DOI logo
Duarte, Inês, Rita Gonçalves & Feliciano Chimbutane
2023. Dative possessor variation in Romance: a formal feature account with special reference to Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 22:1 DOI logo
L. O. Van de Velde, Mark
2023. Alternatives for reductionist approaches to comparative Bantu grammar. Linguistique et langues africaines :9(1) DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.