This paper shows that an adequate semantic analysis of causative transitive constructions with verbs like break, turn and roll has to take into account two phenomena: 1) semantic specification, and 2) change of state or accomplishment. These two phenomena are not at all specific to this type of transitive construction and, as a matter of fact, causation is nothing more than the co-occurrence of an unspecified subject and a change of state. The process leading up to this change of state is not controlled by the initiator of the event. Interestingly, absence of control occurs precisely when the subject is unspecified.
2016. The Syntactic and Semantic Structures of the English Causative <i>to</i>-infinitives. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences 22:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
2015. The Syntax‐Semantics Interface. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, ► pp. 593 ff.
Hyun Kyoung Jung
2014. Korean First Phase Syntax as Non-Voice-bundling. Studies in Generative Grammar 24:1 ► pp. 201 ff.
Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2012. Manner and Result in the Roots of Verbal Meaning. Linguistic Inquiry 43:3 ► pp. 331 ff.
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew
2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
ONO, NAOYUKI
2001. Between Grammar and Lexicon (R. Jackendoff, The Architecture of the Language Faculty). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 18:1 ► pp. 196 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.