Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:3 (2020) ► pp.700721
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria
2008To the right of the clause: Right dislocation vs. afterthought. In Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds.), ‘Subordination’ versus ‘coordination’ in sentence and text: A cross-linguistic perspective, 217–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Matthew J.
2012Languages of southern New Guinea project (LSNG04). Digital collection managed by PARADISEC. [Open Access]. https://​catalog​.paradisec​.org​.au​/collections​/LSNG04 (last access: 7 August 2020).
2016The Ngkolmpu language with special reference to distributed exponence. Canberra: The Australian National University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan & Nicholas Evans
1988Multiple case-marking in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 81. 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark
2005Configurationality in the languages of New Guinea. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25(2). 181–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Case and configurationality: Scrambling or mapping? Morphology 211. 499–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
2007Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Wayan Arka, Matthew Carroll, Yung Jung Choi, Christian Döhler, Volker Gast, Eri Kashima, Emil Mittag, Kyla Quinn, Dineke Schokken, Jeff Siegel, Philip Tama & Charlotte van Tongeren
2017The languages of southern New-Guinea. In Bill Palmer (ed.), The languages and linguistics of the New Guinea area, 641–774. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1967Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 1. Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 37–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1981Toward a taxonomy of given – new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva & Candide Simard
2012Constraints on noun phrase discontinuity in an Australian language: The role of prosody and information structure. Linguistics 50(5). 1015–1058. DOI logoGoogle Scholar