References

References

Alonso de la Fuente, José A.
2018Past tenses, diminutives and expressive palatalization: Typology and the limits of internal reconstruction in Tungusic. In Akos B. Apatoczky & Christopher Atwood (eds.), Philology of the grasslands. Essays in Mongolic, Turkic and Tungusic studies, 112–137. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter
2010Notes on the Lithuanian restrictive. Baltic Linguistics 1. 9–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Avrorin, Valentin A.
1961Grammatika nanajskogo jazyka (A grammar of Nanai). Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Beloljubskaja, Varvara G.
1997Služebnye slova v evenskom jazyke (Functional words in Even). Sankt-Petersburg: Institute for linguistic studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes
1955Die tungusischen Sprachen. Versuch einer vergleichenden Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Mainz in Kommission bei Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Bulatova, Nadezhda Ja
2015Emocional’no-ocenočnye suffiksy imennyh i glagol’nyh form v evenkijskom jazyke (Evaluative nominal and verbal suffixes in Evenki). Acta Linguistica Petropolitana XI(2). 60–77.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1985Morphology (Typological Studies in Language 9). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1985Morphology and word order reconstruction: Problems and prospects. In J. Fisiak, (ed.), Historical semantics. Historical word-formation. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 85–96.Google Scholar
Cincius, Vera I.
1982Negidaljskij jazyk. Issledovanija i materialy (Negidal: explorations and materials). Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
García-Castillero, Carlos
2013Morphological externalisation and the Old Irish verbal particle ro . Transactions of the Philological Society 111(1). 108–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018On morphological internalization. The origin of the Old Irish oblique relative conjunct particle -(s)aN-. Diachronica, 35(1). 35–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerasimova, Anna N.
2002Nanajskij I uljčskij jazyki v Rossii: sravniteljnaja harakteristika sociolingvističeskoj situacii (Nanai and Ulcha in Russia: a comparative characteristics of the sociolinguistic situation). Jazyki korennyh narodov Sibiri (Languages of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia) 12. 246–257.Google Scholar
Gusev, Valentin Ju
2019North Samoyed and the misterious Sprachbund. Paper presented at the Conference on Language Contact in the Circumpolar World. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics 25–27 October 2019.
forthcoming. O substrate eskimosskogo tipa v jazykah Severnoj Azii. Submitted to Voprosy Jazykoznanija.
Harris, Alice C. & Jan T. Faarlund
2006Trapped morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42(2). 289–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993The diachronic externalization of inflection. Linguistics 31. 279–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Eugen
2007Proportionale Analogie, paradigmatischer Ausgleich und Formenerweiterung: ein Beitrag zur Typologie des morphologischen Wandels. Diachronica 24. 81–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel
1996Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72. 533–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kazama, Shinjiro
1996Ulcha oral literature, a collection of texts. Tottori: Tottori Daigaku Kyōiku Gakubu.Google Scholar
2002Ulcha oral literature 2 (Publications on Tungus Languages and Cultures 20). Osaka: ELPR.Google Scholar
2006Ulcha oral literature 3 (Publications on Tungus Languages and Cultures 30). Tokyo: Graduate School of Letters, Hokkaido University.Google Scholar
2008Ulcha oral literature 4 (Publications on Tungus Languages and Cultures 43). Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
2010Ulcha oral literature 5 (Publications on Tungus Languages and Cultures 49). Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Khanina, Olesya & Andrey Shluinsky
2011Emphatic transcategorial morphology: A cross-linguistically rare phenomenon in Enets. In Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, Lutz Marten, & David Nathan (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Language Documentation & Linguistic Theory, 3. London: SOAS. 171–181.Google Scholar
Koch, Harold
1996Reconstruction in morphology. In Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed (regularity and irregularity in language change). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 218–263.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1991The meaning of focus particles. A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Majer, Marek
2015Russian kotóryj, Czech který, Slovene katę´ri: Vowel Variation in the Reflexes of Proto-Slavic *koterъ(jь) ‘which (of the two)’. Scando-Slavica 61(2). 154–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L.
2008Sintaksis evenskogo jazyka (Even Syntax). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Miyaoka, Osahito
2012A grammar of Central Alaskan Yupik (CAY). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2000The reordering of morphemes. In Spike Gildea (ed.) Reconstructing grammar: Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization, 231–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina
2014A Grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pakendorf, Brigitte
2017Lamunkhin Even evaluative morphology in cross-linguistic comparison. Morphology 27. 123–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pakendorf, Brigitte & Ilja V. Krivoshapkina
2014Even nominal evaluatives and the marking of definiteness. Linguistic Typology 18(2). 289–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petrova, Taisija I.
1936Ul’čskij dialekt nanajskogo jazyka (The Ulcha dialect of Nanai). Moscow/Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe učebno-pedagogičeskoe izdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A. & Xenia P. Semionova
2016K tipologii drevnearmjanskoj imennoj paradigmatiki: Instr.Pl (Towards a typology of Classical Armenian nominal paradigms: Instr.Pl). Voprosy jazykoznanija 5. 103–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rudnitskaya, Elena L.
2017Delimitativnyj affiks -riktV- i fokusnaja častica (h)ələ v evenkijskom jazyke kak veršiny dvuh raznyh proekcij DelimP i FocP (The delimitative affix -riktV- and the focus particle (h)ələ) as the heads of two different projections, i.e. DelimP and FocP). In Ekaterina A. Ljutikova & Anton V. Zimmerling (eds.), Typology of morphosyntactic parameters 4. Working papers of the international conference TMP-2017, 209–221. Moscow: Pushkin State Russian Language Institute.Google Scholar
Sumbatova, Nina R. & Valentin Ju. Gusev
2016Ul’čskij jazyk (The Ulcha language). In Vida Ju. Mikhaljchenko (ed.), Jazyk i obš’estvo. Enciklopedija, 513–515. Moscow: Azbukovnik.Google Scholar
Sunik, Orest P.
1982Suš’estvitel’noe v tunguso-man’čžurskih jazykah (Nouns in Tungus-Manchu languages). Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
1985Ul’čskij jazyk. Issledovanija i materialy (The Ulcha language: Explorations and materials). Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Tolskaya, Maria
2015Evaluative Morphology in Udihe. In Nicola Grandi & Lívia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, 333–340. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Vogt, Hans
1971Grammaire de la langue georgienne. Oslo: Instituttet for sammenlignende kulturforskning.Google Scholar
Wagner-Nagy, Beáta
2002Jest’ li klitiki v nganasanskom jazyke? (Are there clitics in Nganasan?) In Vladimir Plungian & Anna Yu. Urmanchieva (eds.), Pam’ati T. Yu. Ždanovoj. Jazyki mira. Tipologija. Uralistika, 465–475. Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
2018A grammar of Nganasan. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whaley, Lindsay J. & Fengxiang Li
1998The suffix -kan in Oroqen. Studies in Language 22. 447–471. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ždanova, Tat’jana Ju
2000Ob intraklitičeskih časticah v severno-samodijskih jazykah (na materiale neneckogo i nganasanskogo jazykov) (On intraclitic particles in Northern Samoyedic (the data of Nenets and Nganasan)). In Anu Nurk, Triinu Palo, and Tõnu Seilenthal (eds.), Congressus Nonus internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum. Pars II, 287–288. Tartu: University of Tartu.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold & Geoffrey Pullum
1993Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t . Language 59(3). 502–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar