Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 46:1 (2022) ► pp.201–219

A phonological investigation of Sanzari Boro

ORCID logo | Indian Institute of Technology Patna
| Indian Institute of Technology Patna
This study attempts to investigate the phonological structures of Sanzari Boro (SB), a variety of Boro, a Tibeto-Burman language that is mainly spoken in the state of Assam in the North East India. This paper highlights the phonological processes in SB that have emerged due to geographical as well as social factors and language contact. This research is based on the data collected from 10 native speakers. The analysis of data reveals that although Standard Boro and SB have similarities in some features, they contain some evident differences too. A closer investigation of data establishes that SB has maximum number of phonemes as compared to any other variety of Boro and it has three distinct tones that have been observed in monosyllabic words. Declustering is facilitated through epenthesis. Phonological processes like deletion, insertion, assimilation, weakening and strengthening, metathesis and substitution are operational in formation of SB words.
Keywords: Boro, Sanzari Boro, Tibeto-Burman, phonology, language contact
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Phonemic inventory
    • 3.1Vowels
    • 3.2Consonants
    • 3.3Diphthongs
    • 3.4Tones
    • 3.5Consonant clusters
  • 4.Syllable structure
  • 5.Phonological processes
    • 5.1Deletion
    • 5.2Insertion
    • 5.3Assimilation processes
      • 5.3.1Voicing
      • 5.3.2Devoicing
    • 5.4Weakening and strengthening
      • 5.4.1Monophthongisation
      • 5.4.2Diphthongisation
      • 5.4.3Aspiration
      • 5.4.4Deaspiration
    • 5.5Metathesis
    • 5.6Substitution processes
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 21 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20010.mah
References (24)
References
Abbi, Anvita. 2001. A manual of linguistic field work and structures of Indian languages. Freibadstr: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Baro, Madhu Ram. 2007. The historical development of Boro language, 2nd edn. Guwahati: N.L. Publications.Google Scholar
Basumatary, Phukan. 2005. An introduction to the Boro language. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul King. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, Pramod Chandra. 2007. A descriptive analysis of the Boro language, 2nd edn. Guwahati: Gauhati University.Google Scholar
Brahma, Aleendra. 2013. Modern Boro grammar. Guwahati: N.L. Publications.Google Scholar
. 2015. An introduction to Bodo phonology. Guwahati: Bhabani Books.Google Scholar
Brahma, Mihir Kumar. 2014. Negation in the southern dialect of Bodo. Language in India 14(5). 179–191.Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 1959. Proto-Bodo. Language 35(3). 433–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. The Tibeto-Burman languages of northeastern India. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 169–191. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2013. The ‘sixth’ vowel in the Boro-Garo languages. In Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey, & Mark W. Post (eds.), North east Indian linguistics 51, 271–280. New Delhi: Foundation Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endle, Rev. Sidney. 1884. Outline grammar of the Kachári (Bårå) language as spoken in district Darrang, Assam; With illustrative sentences, notes, reading lessons, and a short vocabulary. Shillong: Assam Secretariat Press.Google Scholar
Grierson, George Abraham. 1903. Tibeto-Burman Family, Vol. 3, Part II: Specimens of the Bodo, Naga, and Kachin groups. Calcutta: The Linguistic Survey of India.Google Scholar
Hakasam, Upen Rabha. 2013. Boro Bhaxar Magra Upobhaxa: eti Porisoymulok Adhyoyon [The Magra dialect of Bodo: An introductory study]. Dhemaji: Kiran Prakashan.Google Scholar
Halvorsrud, Haakon. 1959. A Short Grammar of the Boro Language. Assam: Boro Literature Board.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Brian Houghton. 1847. On the Aborigines of India, essay the first, on the Koch, Bodo and Dhimal tribes. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
Jacquesson, Franҫois. 2002. An approach to Comparative Bodo-Garo phonology. Paper presented at the International Conference for Sino-Tibetan Languages & Linguistics 35. 7–10 November 2002, Tempe, Arizona.
Joseph, Umbavu Varghese & Robbins Burling. 2001. Tone correspondence among the Bodo languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(2). 41–55.Google Scholar
Mahela, Ratul & Sweta Sinha. 2018. Case markers in Bodo and Sanzari Bodo: A comparative investigation. International Journal of Linguistics 10(3). 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musharary, Jitamoni & Sahiinii Lemaina Veikho. 2016. A note on Bodo phonology. Indian Linguistics 77(1–2). 61–78.Google Scholar
Sarma, Chandan. 2013. A study on dialect variation of Bodo language and associated grapheme-to-phoneme (G2P) rules for Bodo TTS System. Gauhati: Gauhati University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Sarmah, Priyankoo. 2004. Some aspects of tonal phonology in Bodo. Hyderabad: Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Sarmah, Priyankoo, Leena Dihingia, & Dimple Choudhury. 2015. An acoustic study of Bodo vowels. Himalayan Linguistics 14(1). 20–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Driem, George. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas. An ethnolinguistic handbook of the Greater Himalayan region: Containing an introduction to the symbiotic theory of language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar