Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 46:1 (2022) ► pp. 220257
Ahland, Coleen Anne
2012A grammar of Northern and Southern Gumuz. Eugene: University of Oregon PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter & Pfänder, Stefan
2007Multiple retractions in spoken French and spoken German. A contrastive study in oral performance styles. Cahiers de praxématique 481. 57–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alfonzetti, Giovanna
2002La relativa non-standard. Italiano popolare o italiano parlato? Palermo: Centro di Studi Filologici e Linguistici Siciliani.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery
2007Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 2, Complex constructions, 2nd edn, 206–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ballarè, Silvia & M. Silvia Micheli
2018Usi di dove nell’italiano contemporaneo: costruzioni relative e dinamiche di ristandardizzazione. Linguistica e Filologia 381. 29–56.Google Scholar
Ballarè, Silvia, Massimo Cerruti & Eugenio Goria
2019Variazione diastratica nel parlato di giovani: il caso delle costruzioni relative. In Bruno Moretti, Aline Kunz, Silvia Natale & Etna Krakenberger (eds.), Le tendenze dell’italiano contemporaneo rivisitate. Atti del 52esimo congresso internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI), Bern, 6–8 September 2018, 75–94. Milano: Officinaventuno.Google Scholar
Bernini, Giuliano
1989Tipologia delle frasi relative italiane e Romanze. In Fabio Foresti, Elena Rizzi & Paola Benedini (eds.), L’italiano tra le lingue romanze. Atti del XX Congresso Internazionale della Società di Linguistica Italiana (Bologna, 25–27 settembre 1986), 85–98. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano
1983L’italiano popolare e la semplificazione linguistica. Vox Romanica 421. 38–79.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano & Massimo Cerruti
2015Manuale di sociolinguistica. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Brook, Marisa
2011One of those situations where a relative pronoun becomes a complementizer: A case of grammaticalization in progress… again. In Lisa Armstrong (ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 1–7.Google Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo
2017Changes from below, changes from above. Relative constructions in contemporary Italian. In Massimo Cerruti, Claudia Crocco & Stefania Marzo (eds.), Towards a new standard. Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian, 32–61. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo & Silvia Ballarè
2020Parlato: corpus del parlato di Torino. Bollettino dell’Atlante Linguistico Italiano 441. 13–38.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1988La frase relativa. In Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Vol. 11, 443–503. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Tania Kuteva
2013Relativization Strategies. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Chapter s8. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at Available online at http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/s8 (last access 10 April 2021).
Crahe, Maxime-Morvan
2013Le breton de Languidic: étude phonétique, morphologique et syntaxique d’un sous-dialecte du breton vannetais. Rennes: Université Rennes 2 PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2003Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2017Implicational universals and dependencies. In Nick J. Enfield (ed.), Dependencies in language: On the causal ontology of linguistic systems, 9–22. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia & Anna Giacalone Ramat
2007Relativization strategies in the languages of Europe. In Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds.), Europe and the Mediterranean as linguistic areas: Convergencies from a historical and typological perspective, 63–93. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia & Fernando Zúñiga
2018Synchronic vs. diachronic approaches to typological hierarchies. In Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.), Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony, 4–27. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Achille, Paolo
1990Sintassi del parlato e tradizione scritta della lingua italiana. Analisi di testi dalle origini al secolo XVIII. Roma: Bonacci.Google Scholar
de Vries, Mark
2002The syntax of relativization. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2005The fall and rise of universals on relativization. Journal of Universal Language 61. 125–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2002Relativization and Nominalization in Bodic. In Patrick Chew (ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Tibeto-Burman and Southeast Asian Linguistics, 55–72. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Roberto, Elisa
2008Le proposizioni relative con antecedente in italiano antico. Roma / Sorbonne: Università Roma Tre / Université Paris IV, Sorbonne PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger, & Michael Tomasello
2005A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language 81(4). 882–906. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J.
2007A grammar of Lao. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg
2004A typology of relative clauses in German dialects. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective, 211–244. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2005Relativsätze in den Dialekten des Deutschen: Vergleich und Typologie. Linguistik online 24(3). 171–186.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A.
1987The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy reinterpreted: Subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis? Language 63(4). 856–870. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1987Beyond background and foreground. In Russel S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, 175–188. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Toward a diachronic typology of relative clause. In Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds.), Relative clauses in languages of the Americas: A typological overview, 1–26. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Götze, Lutz & Ernest W. B. Hess-Lüttich
1999Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Munich: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2019aDifferential place marking and differential object marking. Language Typology and Universals (STUF) 72(3). 313–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019bCan cross-linguistic regularities be explained by change constraints? In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja A. Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 1–23. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1999Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language 75(2). 244–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hendery, Rachel
2012Relative clauses in time and space: A case study in the methods of diachronic typology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004Lexicalization and grammaticization: opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization: A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Holmstedt, Robert D.
2002The relative clause in Biblical Hebrew: A linguistic analysis. Madison: University of Wisconsin PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Holton, Gary
2006The relational noun marker in Tobelo (Northeast Halmaheran). In Tenth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics. https://​sil​-philippineslanguages​.org​/ical​/papers​.html
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, Geoffrey K. Pullum & Peter Peterson
2002Relative constructions and unbounded dependencies. In Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 1031–1096. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huehnergard, John
1997A grammar of Akkadian. Winona Lake (Indiana): Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D.
1983Relativization in Modern Greek: another look at the accessibility hierarchy constraints. Lingua 60(1). 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1985Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 2, Complex constructions, 141–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward & Bernard Comrie
1977Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 81. 63–99.Google Scholar
1979Noun phrase accessibility revisited. Language 55(3). 649–664. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward & Sarah Hawkins
1987The psychological validity of the accessibility hierarchy. In Edward Keenan (ed.), Universal grammar: 15 essays, 60–88. London/Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Klamer, Marian
1998A grammar of Kambera. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kruspe, Nicole
2004A grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kullavanijaya, Pranee
2008A Historical Study of /thîi/ in Thai. In Anthony V. N. Diller, Jerold A. Edmonson & Yongxian Luo (eds.), The Tai-Kadai languages, 445–467. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog, Seongha Rhee
2019World lexicon of grammaticalization. 2nd, extensively revised & updated edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1994The study of change in progress: observations in real time. In William Labov (ed.), Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors, 73–112. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Informative structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre & Marie Skrovech
2016Les relatives en français vernaculaire. SHS Web of Conferences, Vol. 271 2016, 5e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1986On the typology of relative clauses. Linguistics 241. 663–680. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, Liberty A.
2010A descriptive grammar of Yongning Na (Mosuo). Austin: University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2016The mapping of space onto the domain of benefaction and some unpredicted trends in semantic change. Linguistics 54(2). 339–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luzi, Eleonora
2012Relativization strategies in SLA. Second Language Research 24(4). 443–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackridge, Peter
1985The Modern Greek language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Chrisitan & Sandra A. Thompson
1988The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 275–329. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Dan
1982Implications of NP accessibility for diachronic syntax. Folia Linguistica Historica 31. 135–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Suzanne, Martin Haspelmath & the APiCS consortium
2013Subject relative clauses. In Susanne Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.), The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures, Chapter 92. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at https://​apics​-online​.info​/parameters​/92​.chapter​.html (last access 10 April 2021).
Mithun, Marianne
2018Deconstructing teleology: The place of synchronic usage patterns among processes of diachronic development. In Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.), Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony, 111–128. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murelli, Adriano
2011Relative constructions in European non-standard varieties. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, Nick
1998The story of pu: The grammaticalisation in space and time of a Modern Greek complementiser. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Emanuela Sanfelici
2017Relative clauses. In Andreas Dufter & Elizabeth Stark (eds.), Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax, 804–846. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Price, Glanville
2008A comprehensive French grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew
2019Relative clauses: Structure and variation in everyday English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1984Towards a typology of relative-clause formation strategies in Germanic. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical Syntax, 437–470. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D.
2005Studies in Semitic grammaticalization. Winona Lake (Indiana): Eisenbrauns. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serianni, Luca
2006 [1989]Grammatica italiana: italiano comune e lingua letteraria. Suoni, forme, costrutti. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Shagal, Ksenia
2019Participles: A typological study. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1991Grammaticization of topic into subject. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 2, Types of grammatical markers, 93–134. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Yasuhiro & Hiromi Ozeki
2007The acquisition of relative clauses and the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy: A universal in SLA? Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29(2).155–167.Google Scholar
Smits, Helena J.
2017A grammar of Lumun. Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
2002Linguistic typology and language acquisition: The accessibility hierarchy and relative clauses. Language Research 38(2). 729–756.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Sander Lestrade & Stolz Christel
2014The crosslinguistics of zero-marking of spatial relations. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Topping, Donald M.
1973Chamorro reference grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Peter, Robert Hunt, Jeff McGriff & Richard E. Elkins
2006The Grammar of Matigsalug Manobo. The Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington. Available at https://​www​.sil​.org​/resources​/archives​/53940 (last access 10 April 2021).
Watke, Bruce K. & Michael P. O’Connor
1990An introduction to Biblical Hebrew syntax. Winona Lake (Indiana): Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max, Alan Yates & Nicolau Dols
1999Catalan: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona
2011Introduction. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization strategies in Asian languages, 1–60. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar


American National Corpus
Enquêtes Sociolinguistiques à Orléans (ESLO Corpus)
ParlaTO Corpus
Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American Eglish (SBC)