Full-text

Typology of coding patterns and frequency effects of antipassives
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2007Typological distinctions in word-formation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 1–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith
1999Agent Focus and Inverse in Tzotzil. Language 75(3). 451–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aiton, Grant
2016Grammatical relations and information structure in Eibela: A typological perspective. Townsville: James Cook University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Andersen, T.
1988Ergativity in Pari, a Nilotic OVS language. Lingua 75. 289–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter & Alexander Letuchiy
2008Derivacii antipassivnoj zony v adygejskom jazyke. In Vladimir A. Plungjan & Sergej G. Tatevosov (eds.), Issledovanija po otglagol’noj derivacii, 77–102. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kul’tur.Google Scholar
2021Indirect antipassives in Circassian. In Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Downloaded from academia​.edu on 23 November 2017. Crossref
Austin, Peter K.
2013A grammar of Diyari, South Australia. 2nd edn, version 2.5. London: SOAS, University of London. (Originally published by Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Authier, Gilles & Katharina Haude
2012Introduction. In Gilles Authier & Katharina Haude (eds.), Ergativity, valency and voice (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 48), 1–14. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beach, Matthew
2012Studies in Inuktitut grammar. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2010Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause-hierarchy and clause-linking: the syntax and pragmatics interface, 51–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Multivariate typology and field linguistics: a case study on detransitivization in Kiranti (Sino-Tibetan). In Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, David Nathan & Lutz Marten (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 3, 3–13. London: SOAS.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Sabine Stoll, Martin Gaenszle, Novel Kishor Rai, Elena Lieven, Goma Banjade, Toya Nath Bhatta, Netra Prasad Paudyal, Judith Pettigrew, Ichchha Purna Rai, Manoj Rai, Taras Zakharko & Robert Schikowski
2016Audiovisual corpus of the Chintang language, including a longitudinal corpus of language acquisition by six children, paradigm sets, grammar sketches, ethnographic descriptions, and photographs.Google Scholar
Bittner, Maria
1987On the semantics of the Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 53(2). 1–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blight, Robert
2004Head movement, passive, and antipassive in English. Austin: University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen
2007Morpholexical transparency and the argument structure of verbs of cutting and breaking. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2). 153–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Budd, Peter
2014Partitives in Oceanic languages. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 54), 523–562. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2001Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
1985The Pipil language of El Salvador. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, Julien
2017The ergative-antipassive alternation in Inuktitut: Analyzed in a case of new-dialect formation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique. 62(4). 661–684. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Jean Ormsbee
1993A grammar of Comanche. (Studies in the Anthropology of North American Indians). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1989Some general properties of Reference-tracking Systems. In Doug Arnold, Martin Atkinson, Jacques Durand, Claire Grover & Louisa Sadler (eds.), Essays on Grammatical Theory and Universal Grammar, 37–51. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Madzhid Khalilov & Zaira Khalilova
2015Valency and valency classes in Bezhta. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, vol.1. (Comparative Handbooks of Linguistics 1/1), 541–570. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
2013Alignment of case marking of full noun phrases. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/98 (last access 8 December 2017).
Coon, Jessica, Diane Massam, & Lisa Demena Travis
(eds.) 2017The Oxford handbook of ergativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, Ann
1987Transitivity and discourse continuity in Chamorro narratives. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994A functional typology of antipassives. In Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), Voice: Form and function, 49–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2012Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2000Egophoricity in discourse and syntax. Functions of Language 7. 33–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Animacy and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and phylogeny. Lingua 118, 141–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Reuse, Willem
1994Noun incorporation. In Ron Asher (ed.). Encyclopaedia of language and linguistics, 2842–2847. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1972The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. London: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1980The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1987Studies in ergativity. Amsterdam: North-Holland. (Reissue of Lingua 71). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
1997A typology of argument-determined constructions. In John Haiman, Sandra A. Thompson, Talmy Givón & Joan Bybee (eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón, 71–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark
1999Warembori. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Doornenbal, Marius A.
2009A grammar of Bantawa: grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of Eastern Nepal. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1997On the six-way word order typology, Studies in Language 21(1). 69–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John
1987The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63. 805–852. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Michael J.
1999A Grammar of Chukchi. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
England, Nora C.
1988Mam Voice. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and Voice, 525–545. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983A Grammar of Mam, a Mayan language (Texas Linguistics Series). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
England, Nora C. & Laura Martin
2003Issues in the comparative argument structure analysis in Mayan narratives. In William J. Ashby, Lorraine Edith Kumpf & John W. Du Bois (eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 131–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Estigarribia, Bruno
2017A grammar s etch o Paraguayan Guaraní. In Bruno Estigarribia and Justin Pinta (eds.), Guarani linguistics in the 21st century, 7–85. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Caleb
2009A reconsideration of the motivations for preferred argument structure. Studies in Language 33(1). 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1986Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. Berkeley Linguistics Series 12. 95–107.Google Scholar
Fleck, David W.
2003A grammar of Matses. Houston: Rice University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2006Antipassive in Matses. Studies in language 30(3). 541–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A.
2007A typology of information packaging in the clause. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. 2nd edn, vol. 1: Clause structure, 362–446. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin
1984Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A.
1995The Category S in English conversation. In Werner Abraham, Talmy Givón & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse Grammar and Typology, 153–178. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1991Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in Language 15(1). 85–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Syntax, vol 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1966Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Grinevald-Craig, Colette
1977The structure of Jacaltec. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1979The antipassive and Jacaltec. In Laura Martin (ed.), Papers in Mayan linguistics 1, 139–164. Columbia, Miss.: Lucas Brothers.Google Scholar
Grossman, Eitan
under review. Noun (phrase) incorporation? A preliminary cross-linguistic survey.
2018From suffix to prefix to interposition via Differential Object Marking in Egyptian-Coptic. In Ilja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Diachrony of differential argument marking, 129–151. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine
2008A grammar of Cavineña (Mouton Grammar Library 44). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
1983Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59. 781–819. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2015Transitivity prominence. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, vol. 1: Introducing the framework, and case studies from Africa and Eurasia (Comparative Handbooks of Linguistics 1/1), 131–147. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2020a+Role-reference associations and the explanation of argument coding splits. Linguistics.Google Scholar
2008aFrequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008bCreating economical patterns in language change. In Good, Jeff (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 185–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008cA frequentist explanation of some universals of reflexive marking. Linguistic Discovery 6(1). 40–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15. 535–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020b+Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondencies and predictability. Journal of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Iren Hartmann
2015Comparing verbal valency across languages. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, vol. 1: Introducing the framework, and case studies from Africa and Eurasia (Comparative Handbooks of Linguistics 1/1) 41–71. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haude, Katharina
2006A grammar of Movima. Zetten: Manta.Google Scholar
2018A topic-marking cleft? Analyzing clause-initial pronouns in Movima. In Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds), Information structure in lesser-described languages: Studies in prosody and syntax (Studies in Language Accompanying Series 199), 217–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
2004Efficiency & complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Cross-linguistic variation and efficiency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1976Antipassivization: A functional typology. In Henry Thompson, Kenneth Whistler et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 202–211. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Heaton, Raina
2017A typology of antipassives, with special reference to Mayan. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa? PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Sandra A. Thompson
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56. 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2012From denominal derivation to incorporation. Lingua 122(11). 1207–1231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021Antipassive derivations in Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan and their sources. In Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian & Harry Tily
2011On language “utility”: Processing complexity and communicative efficiency. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2(3). 323–335.Google Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna
2013The Slavonic languages and the development of the antipassive marker. In Irina Kor-Chahine (ed.), Current studies in Slavic languages, 61–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016aOn the reflexive-antipassive polysemy: Typological convergence from unrelated languages. The Annual Meetings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 36. 158–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bL’antipassif dans les langues accusatives (GRAMM-R. Études de Linguistique Française 29). Brussels: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Alana
2006Ergativity and change in Inuktitut. In Alana Johns, Diane Massam & Juvénal Ndayiragije (eds.), Ergativity: Emerging issues, 239–311. Springer. Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin I.
1994On the lexical distribution of agent-preserving and object-preserving transitivity alternations. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17(2). 141–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keen, Sandra
1983Yukulta. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages 3, 191–306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1998Partitive Case and Aspect. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The Projection of arguments. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kozinsky, Isaac, Vladimir Nedjalkov & Maria Polinskaja
1988Antipassive in Chukchee. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 651–706. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid
2011Voice typology. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1988A usage-based model. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics, 127–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Letuchiy, Alexander B.
2012Ergativity in the Adyghe system of valency-changing derivations. In Gilles Authier & Katharina Haude (eds.), Ergativity, valency and voice, 323–354. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
2000Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L.
2015Valency classes and alternations: parameters of variation. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, vol. 1: Introducing the framework, and case studies from Africa and Eurasia (Comparative Handbooks of Linguistics 1/1), 73–130. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maslova, Elena
2003A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matasović, Ranko
2010A short grammar of East Circassian (Kabardian). Manuscript. Zagreb.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1984The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60(4). 847–894. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986On the nature of noun incorporation. Language 62(1). 32–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miyaoka, Osahito
2012 A grammar of Central Alaskan Yupik (CAY), vol. 2. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Even Hovdhaugen
1992Samoan reference grammar (Instituttet for sammenlignende kulturforskning 85). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
1994Grammatical roles and relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patz, Elisabeth
2002A grammar of the Kuku Yalanji language of North Queensland (Pacific Linguistics 527). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir P.
2000Obščaja morfologija. Moscow: URSS. (General morphology)Google Scholar
Polian, Gilles
2013Gramática del tseltal de Oxchuc. México: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2005Antipassive constructions. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 438–441. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013Antipassive constructions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/108 (last access 8 December 2017.)
2017Antipassive. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam, & Lisa Travis (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 308–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria & Vladimir P. Nedjalkov
1987Contrasting the absolutive in Chukchee: Syntax, semantics, pragmatics. Lingua 71. 239–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pustet, Regina & David S. Rood
2008Argument dereferentialization in Lakota. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.). The typology of semantic alignment, 334–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, Richard & Rand Valentine
2015Transitivity in Ojibwe. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, vol. 2: Case studies from Austronesia and the Pacific, the Americas, and theoretical outlook (Comparative Handbooks of Linguistics 1/2), 1205–1264. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Rude, Noel
1988Ergative, passive, and antipassive in Nez Perce: A discourse perspective. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Passive and voice, 547–560. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sansò, Andrea
2017Where do antipassive constructions come from? A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica 34(2). 175–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Explaining the diversity of antipassives: Formal grammar vs. (diachronic) typology. Lang Linguist Compass. 12:e12277. Available at Crossref (last access 8 December 2020).Google Scholar
Say, Sergey
2005Antipassive sja-verbs in Russian: between inflection and derivation. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds), Morphology and its demarcations (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 264), 253–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008K tipologii antipassivnyx konstrukcij: Semantika, pragmatika, sintaksis [Towards a typology of anti-passive constructions: Semantics, pragmatics, syntax]. St. Petersburg: Institute of Linguistic Studies PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2021Antipassive and the lexical meaning of verbs. In Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Antipassive constructions in the languages of the world (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schackow, Diana
2015A grammar of Yakkha (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 7). Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schikowski, Robert
2013Object-conditioned differential marking in Chintang and Nepali. Zurich: University of Zurich PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Schneider, Cynthia
2010A grammar of Abma: A language of Pentecost island, Vanuatu. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Schröder, Helga
2015Alignment systems and passive-antipassive distribution in Nilotic languages. The University of Nairobi Journal of Language and Linguistics 4. 42–81.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang
2011The Lak language. Nová filologická revue 3. 11–36.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A.
2014aThe independent partitive genitive in Lithuanian. In Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds.), Grammatical relations and their non-canonical encoding in Baltic (Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 1), 257–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014bThe independent partitive genitive in North Russian. In Ilja A. Seržant & Björn Wiemer (eds.), Contemporary approaches to dialectology: The area of North, Northwest Russian and Belarusian vernaculars (Slavica Bergensia 13), 270–329. Bergen: John Grieg AS.Google Scholar
2015Independent partitive as a Circum-Baltic isogloss. Journal of Language Contact 8. 341–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthcoming. Typology of partitive expressions.
Shibatani, Masayoshi
2006On the conceptual framework for voice phenomena. Linguistics 44(2). 217–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
1984The passive: A contrastive linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1972Chinook Jargon: Language contact and the problem of multi-level generative systems, I. Language 48. 378–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Smith-Stark, Thom
1978The Mayan antipassive: Some facts and fictions. Papers in Mayan linguistics 2. 169–187.Google Scholar
Spreng, Bettina
2001Little v in Inuktitut: Antipassive revisited. Linguistica Atlantica 23, 155–190.Google Scholar
2005Third-person arguments in Inuktitut. In Solveiga Armoskaite & James J. Thompson (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on the Structure and Constituency of the Languages of the Americas 10 (UBC Working Papers in Linguistics 17), 215–225. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Sumbatova, N. R., Ju. A. Lander & M. X. Mamaev
2014Darginskij govor selenija Tanty. Grammatičeskij očerk. Voprosy sintaksisa (Pri učastii Magomeda Mameva). Moskva: JSK.Google Scholar
Sumbatova, Nina & Rasul Mutalov
2003A grammar of Icari Dargwa. München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei
2011Detelicization and argument suppression: Evidence from Godoberi, Linguistics 49. 135–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Testelets, Yakov G.
2001Russian works on linguistic typology in the 1960–1990s. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, 306–323. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1988Antipassive in Warrungu and other Australian Languages. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 595–649. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D.
1981Grammatical relations and ergative languages. Studies in Language 5(3). 361–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigus, M.
2018Antipassive constructions: Correlations of form and function across languages. Linguistic Typology 22(3). 339–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Honoré
2003A morphological description of Sliammon, Mainland Comox Salish with a sketch of syntax (Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim A 040). Osaka: ELPR.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren
2016Quantitative tests of implicational verb hierarchies. In Taro Kageyama & Wesley M. Jacobsen (eds.), Transitivity and valency alternations: Studies on Japanese and beyond (Trends in Linguistics 297), 423–444. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zavala, Roberto
1997Functional analysis of Akatek voice constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 63(4). 439–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zipf, George Kingsley
1949Human behavior and the principle of least effort. An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar