Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 46:1 (2022) ► pp.40–75

Beyond nominal tense

Temporality, aspect, and relevance in Tariana noun phrases

ORCID logo | James Cook University
Tariana, an Arawak language from Brazil, has nominal markers which convey temporal and aspectual information about the noun phrase. Besides nominal future, there is a distinction between completed and non-completed nominal pasts. The completed nominal past has three meanings – decessive (‘late, gone’), temporal (‘former’), and commiserative or deprecatory (‘poor thing’). The latter is only applicable to humans and higher animates. The non-completed nominal past has a further semantic component of relevance of the state or property for the present time. The usage of the markers is governed by the principle of communicative necessity – in contrast to clausal, or propositional, tense-cum-evidentiality markers which are always obligatory. Having special means for expressing tense, aspect and relevance within a noun phrase – distinct from tense and aspect categories with clausal scope – constitutes a typologically rare feature of the language.
Keywords: nominal tense, decessive meaning, relevance, Tariana, Arawak languages
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Non-propositional tense in its varied guises
    • 1.2Expressing tense in Tariana
  • 2.Non-propositional pasts in Tariana: Temporality, completion, and relevance
    • 2.1The non-completed non-propositional past in Tariana
    • 2.2The completed non-propositional past in Tariana
      • 2.2.1Decessive meaning of the completed non-propositional past
      • 2.2.2The temporal meaning of the completed non-propositional past
      • 2.2.3Commiserative and deprecatory meanings of the completed non-propositional past
      • 2.2.4The completed non-propositional past in Kumandene Tariana
      • 2.2.5The Tariana completed non-propositional past: A typological backdrop
  • 3.‘Tense stacking’
    • A.Completed non-propositional past followed by non-propositional future
    • B.Non-completed non-propositional past followed by completed non-propositional past
  • 4.Beyond non-propositional tense: Temporality, aspect, and relevance
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 23 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20056.aik
References (63)
References
Abbott, Miriam. 1991. Macushi. In Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. 11, 23–160. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. A grammar of Tariana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010. Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press (revised paperback edition).Google Scholar
2014a. The grammar of knowledge in typological perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), The grammar of knowledge, 1–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b. Language contact, and language blend: Kumandene Tariana of north-west Amazonia. International Journal of American Linguistics 801. 323–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015a. The art of grammar: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2015b. The languages of the Amazon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2017. Tariana, an Arawak language from north-west Amazonia. In Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis, 713–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
& the Brito family. 2002. Dicionário Tariana-Português e Português-Tariana. Museu Goeldi: Belém. (Boletim do museu Goeldi 17: 1, Julho 2001, copyright 2002).Google Scholar
Allin, Trevor R. 1975. A grammar of Resigaro. St Andrews: University of St. Andrews PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2020. On non-propositional tense. Linguistic Typology 241. 311–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bezerra, Zenilson A. 2005. Gramática Kuripako. São Gabriel da Cachoeira: Missão Novas Tribos do Brasil.Google Scholar
2012. Dicionário Kuripako/Português. São Gabriel da Cachoeira: Missão Novas Tribos do Brasil.Google Scholar
Burton, Strang. 1997. Past tense on nouns as death, destruction and loss. In Kiyomi Kusumoto (ed.), Proceedings of North-eastern Linguistic Society 271, 67–77. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Camargo, Eliane. 2008. Operadores aspectuais de estado marcando o nome em wayana (caribe). LIAMES 81. 85–104.Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne B. 2004. A grammar of Trio, a Cariban language of Suriname. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2006. Feeling the need: The borrowing of Cariban functional categories into Mawayana (Arawak). In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology, 313–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Henry. 2015. Non-propositional tense in Tsou: Nia and its syntax/semantics. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 171. 57–68.Google Scholar
Ciucci, Luca. 2020. Wordhood in Chamacoco. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan M. White (eds.), Phonological word and grammatical word. A cross-linguistic typology, 78–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Courtz, Henk. 2008. A Carib grammar and dictionary. Toronto: Magoria books.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond. C. 1979. Hixkaryana (Lingua Descriptive Studies 1). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1999. Carib. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages, 33–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. The Jarawara Language of Southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005. A semantic approach to English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010. Basic Linguistic Theory. Volume 1. Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012. Basic Linguistic Theory. Volume 3. Further grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014. Making new words in English: Morphological Derivation in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, David. 2009. Mamaindê grammar: A Northern Nambiquara language in its cultural context. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Fleck, David. 2007. Evidentiality and double tense in Matses. Language 831. 589–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franchetto, Bruna & Santos, Mara. 2009. Tempo nominal em Kuikuro (Karib Alto-Xinguano). ReVEL 31. 1–16.Google Scholar
Franchetto, Bruna & Thomas, Guillaume. 2016. The nominal temporal marker -pe in Kuikuro. In Thui Bui & Ivan Rudmila-Rodica (eds.), SULA 9: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on the Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas, 25–40. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.Google Scholar
Galloway, Brent D. 1993. A grammar of Upriver Halkomelem. Berlekey: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gregores, Emma & Jorge A. Suárez. 1967. A description of colloquial Guaraní. The Hague, Paris: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Katherine L. 1988. The morphosyntax of discourse in De’kwana Carib. St. Louis: Washington University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Haude, Katharina. 2006. Grammar of Movima. Nijmegen: Radboud University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Robert E. 1998. Wai Wai. In Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. 41, 25–224. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hoff, Berend. 1968. The Carib language. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2018. Non-propositional evidentiality. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 109–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klumpp, Deloris. 1990. Piapoco grammar. Colombia: SIL.Google Scholar
Koch-Grünberg, Theodor. 1911. Aruak-Sprachen Nordwestbrasiliens und der angrenzenden Gebiete. Mitteilungen der anthropologischen Gesellschaft Wien 411. 33–153, 203–82.Google Scholar
Koehn, Ed & Sally Koehn. 1986. Apalai. In Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. 11, 33–127. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lapenda, G. 1968. Estrutura da língua Iatê. Recife: Imprensa Universitária da universidade Federal do Pernambuco.Google Scholar
Lecarme, Jacqueline. 2008. Tense and modality in nominals. In Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), Time and modality, 195–225. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Ivan. 1999. Nambiquara languages. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages, 269–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. 2014. Concise dictionary of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev D. 2008. Nanti evidential practice: language, knowledge and social action in an Amazonian society. Austin: University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Mihas, Elena. 2013. Non-propositional and verbal temporal morphology in Ashéninka Perené (Arawak). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 451. 43–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2015. On the expression of TAM on nouns: Evidence from Tundra Nenets. Lingua 1661. 99–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel & Louisa Sadler. 2004. Nominal Tense in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Language 801. 776–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, Henri. 1997. A fala Tukano dos Yepâ-masa. Tomo 1: Gramática. Manaus: Inspetoria Salesiana Missionária da Amazônia CEDEM.Google Scholar
. 2001a. Uma gramática do Baniwa do Içana. Manaus: UFAm.Google Scholar
. 2001b. Dicionário Baniwa-Português. Manaus: Universidade do Amazonas.Google Scholar
Reinoso Galindo, A. E. 2002. Gramática de la lengua piapoco. Santafé de Bogotá: Ministerio de cultura.Google Scholar
Seki, Lucy. 2000. Gramática da língua Kamaiurá. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Thomas, Guillaume. 2014. Nominal tense and temporal implicatures: Evidence from Mbyá. Natural Language Semantics 221. 357–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavares, Petronila. 2005. A grammar of Wayãna. Houston: Rice University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2007. Nominal tense? The meaning of Guaraní nominal temporal markers. Language 831. 831–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Defining crosslinguistic categories: The case of nominal tense (Reply to Nordlinger and Sadler). Language 841. 332–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. 1992. Una descripción preliminar de la gramática del Achagua (Arawak). Bogotá: SIL.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2003. On the interpretability of tense on D and its conseqeunces for case theory. Lingua 1131. 659–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wojtylak, Katarzyna I. 2017. A grammar of Murui (Bue): A Witotoan language of north-west Amazonia. Smithfield: James Cook University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Díaz Romero, Camilo Enrique
2023. Observaciones tipológicas sobre la persona gramatical y clases de palabra en documentos coloniales de Colombia, Venezuela y Ecuador. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 23 ► pp. e023015 ff. DOI logo
Jaszczolt, Kasia M.
2023. Flowing Time: Emergentism and Linguistic Diversity. Philosophies 8:6 ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.