Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 21:3 (1997) ► pp.533–575
Evaluative Morphology
In Search of Universals
Various claims from the previous literature about the way in which evaluative morphology (particularly diminutives and augmentatives) operates are tested on a large sample of languages. Evaluative morphology is seen as being less morphologically marginal than has been implied in some of the recent literature, but nevertheless as showing some interesting cross-linguistic tendencies.
Cited by
Cited by 37 other publications
Akinbo, Samuel
2021. Featural affixation and sound symbolism in Fungwa. Phonology 38:4 ► pp. 537 ff. 
Battefeld, Malte, Torsten Leuschner & Gudrun Rawoens
2018. Chapter 9. Evaluative morphology in German, Dutch and Swedish. In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 229 ff.
Booij, Geert
2002. Prosodic restrictions on affixation in Dutch. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001 [Yearbook of Morphology, ], ► pp. 183 ff.
Böhmerová, Ada
2011. Suffixal Diminutives and Augmentatives in Slovak. Lexis :6
Cinque, Guglielmo
2015. Augmentative, pejorative, diminutive and endearing heads in the extended nominal projection*. In Structures, Strategies and Beyond [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 223], ► pp. 67 ff.
Cúneo, Paola
2014. Augmentative in Toba (Guaycuruan). In Word Formation in South American Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 163], ► pp. 51 ff.
Don, Jan & Martin Everaert
2020. Introduction: Advances in Morphology. In Complex Words, ► pp. 1 ff.
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Sonja Schwaiger & Jutta Ransmayr
2020. The Role of Word-Formation Families and Subfamilies in the Organization of German Diminutive Compounds. In Complex Words, ► pp. 293 ff.
Efthymiou, Angeliki
2016. Intensification and deintensification in Modern Greek verbs. Lexis :10
Freywald, Ulrike & Antje Dammel
2023. Morphologie: Das Wort. In Deutsche Sprache der Gegenwart, ► pp. 193 ff.
Gardani, Francesco
2018. On morphological borrowing. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:10
Guillaume, Antoine
2018. The grammatical expression of emotions in Tacana and other Takanan languages. Studies in Language 42:1 ► pp. 114 ff.
GÜNTHER, CHRISTINE, SVEN KOTOWSKI & INGO PLAG
2020. Phrasal compounds can have adjectival heads: evidence from English. English Language and Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Hall, Kathleen Currie, Claire Allen, Tess Fairburn, Michael Fry, Michael McAuliffe & Kevin McMullin
2016. Measuring perceived morphological relatedness. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 61:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Kamber, Julie & Richard Huyghe
2023. Concurrence morphologique et préfixation de haut degré : le cas de méga -, giga - et hypra -. Travaux de linguistique n° 86:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
King, Kendall & Gigliana Melzi
2004. Intimacy, Imitation and Language Learning: Spanish Diminutives in Mother-Child Conversation. First Language 24:2 ► pp. 241 ff.
King, Kendall A. & Colleen Gallagher
2008. Love, Diminutives, and Gender Socialization in Andean Mother–Child Narrative Conversations. In Spanish-Language Narration and Literacy, ► pp. 119 ff.
Körtvélyessy, Lívia & Pavol Štekauer
2018. Postfixation or inflection inside derivation. Folia Linguistica 52:2 ► pp. 351 ff.
Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer
2020. Complex Words,
Meibauer, Jörg
2007. How marginal are phrasal compounds? Generalized insertion, expressivity, and I/Q-interaction. Morphology 17:2 ► pp. 233 ff.
Meibauer, Jörg
2013. Expressive compounds in German. Word Structure 6:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Melissaropoulou, Dimitra & Angela Ralli
2008. Headedness in diminutive formation: Evidence from Modern Greek and its dialectal variation. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55:1-2 ► pp. 183 ff.
Pakendorf, Brigitte
2017. Lamunkhin Even evaluative morphology in cross-linguistic comparison. Morphology 27:2 ► pp. 123 ff.
Park, Ji-Yeon
2022. The phonosemantics of the Korean monosyllabic ideophone ttak. In Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 18], ► pp. 369 ff.
Ponsonnet, Maïa & Marine Vuillermet
Robbeets, Martine & Walter Bisang
2014. Chapter 1. When paradigms change. In Paradigm Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 161], ► pp. 1 ff.
Rose, Françoise
2018. The rise and fall of Mojeño diminutives through the centuries. Studies in Language 42:1 ► pp. 146 ff.
Rácz, Péter, Jennifer B. Hay & Janet B. Pierrehumbert
2017. Social Salience Discriminates Learnability of Contextual Cues in an Artificial Language. Frontiers in Psychology 8
Seraku, Tohru & Takako Akiha
2019. Poi in Japanese Wakamono Kotoba ‘youth language’: A view from attenuation at the speech-act dimension. Lingua 224 ► pp. 1 ff.
Sicherl, Eva
2018. A comparison of diminutive expressions in English and Slovene
as exemplified by Roald Dahl’s Matilda
. Languages in Contrast 18:2 ► pp. 283 ff.
Steriopolo, Olga
2016. Expressives Across Languages: Form/Function Correlation. Annual Review of Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 293 ff.
Taine-Cheikh, Catherine
Toyoshima, Takashi
2018. Chapter 5. Autosegmental evaluative morphology in Japanese. In Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 250], ► pp. 97 ff.
Van Goethem, Kristel & Muriel Norde
2020. Extravagant “fake” morphemes in Dutch. Morphological productivity, semantic profiles and categorical flexibility. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:3 ► pp. 425 ff.
Van Goethem, Kristel, Muriel Norde & Francesca Masini
[no author supplied]
2008. PARENT–CHILD NARRATIVES. In Spanish-Language Narration and Literacy, ► pp. 3 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.