Article published In:
Studies in Language: Online-First Articles

Demonstrative pronouns in Kina Rutul

ORCID logo | HSE University
 | HSE University
This paper presents the results of an experimental study of exophoric uses of demonstrative pronouns in the Kina variety of Rutul (Lezgic, East Caucasian). We collected the questionnaire designed by Wilkins (1999) from seven female native speakers of different ages to determine the spatial meanings of demonstrative pronouns and to identify secondary parameters affecting the use of pronouns, such as visibility of the object and boundaries of the living space. The demonstrative system of Kina Rutul proved to be polycentric (person-oriented). In addition, we found a difference in use of the distal demonstrative. Some speakers use it considering the distance to both participants, while others use it only as a speaker (and not addressee) oriented term. We suppose that this difference might correlate with the speakers’ age and be evidence in favour of a potential change in the system of demonstrative pronouns in the modern language.
Keywords: demonstratives, Wilkins’s questionnaire, polycentric, visibility, East Caucasian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Demonstrative pronouns in Kina Rutul and beyond
  • 3.Method
  • 4.Defining the meanings of the demonstratives
  • 5.Additional parameters
    • 5.1Variation across speakers
    • 5.2Visibility
    • 5.3Boundaries
  • 6.Measuring the distance
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.22059.muk
References (34)
References
Alekseev, Mixail. 1985. Вопросы сравнительно-исторической грамматики лезгинских языков. Морфология. Синтаксис [Questions of comparative-historical grammar of the Lezgic languages: Morphology, syntax.]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 1994. Rutul. In Rieks Smeets (ed.), Indigenous languages of the Caucasus 4(2), 213–258. New York: Caravan books.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen & Edward Keenan. 1985. Deixis. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 259–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Authier, Gilles. 2009. Grammaire kryz: Langue caucasique d’Azerbaïdjan, dialecte d’Alik [Kryz grammar: Caucasian language of Azerbaijan, Alik dialect]. Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
. 2021. Rutul. Available at: [URL] (last access 6 April 2022).
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2018. Yucatec Demonstratives in Interaction: Spontaneous versus Elicited Data. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 176–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 2018. Tzeltal: The demonstrative system. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 150–175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutfield, Sarah. 2018. Dalabon Exophoric Uses of Demonstratives. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 90–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Distance Contrasts in Demonstratives. In Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at [URL] (accessed on 2023-06-17).
Dunn, Michael. 2018. Chukchi: Non-contrastive Spatial Demonstrative Usage. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 303–317. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, & Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2023. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Twenty-sixth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Available online at [URL] (accessed on 2023-06-17).
Enfield, Nick. 2018. Lao Demonstrative Determiners nii4 and nan4: An intensionally discrete distinction for extensionally analogue space. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 72–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ganenkov, Dmitry, Timur Maisak & Solmaz Merdanova. 2009. Дискурсивная анафора в агульском языке [Discourse anaphora in Agul]. Moscow: Institut jazykoznanija RAN.Google Scholar
Garvey, Catherine J. 1964. A sketch of Malagasy grammar. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics of the Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Guirardello-Damian, Raquel. 2018. Trumai: Non-contrastive exophoric uses of demonstratives. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 242–256. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellwig, Birgit. 2018. “See This Sitting One”: Demonstratives and deictic classifiers in Goemai. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 134–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Stefanie. 2018. Warao demonstratives. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 282–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibragimov, Garun. 1978. Рутульский язык [Rutul language]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 2004. Рутульский язык: синхрония и диахрония [Rutul language: synchrony and diachrony]. Maxachkala: DGU.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksander (ed.). 1999. Элементы цахурского языка в типологическом освещении [Elements of Tsakhur grammar in a typological perspective]. Moskow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2018. Introduction: Demonstratives: Patterns in diversity. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 1–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.). 2018. Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margetts, Anna. 2018. Saliba-Logea: Exophoric demonstratives. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 257–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maxmudova, Svetlana. 2002. Грамматические классы слов и грамматические категории рутульского языка [Grammatical classes of words and grammatical categories of the Rutul language]. Maxachkala: DGU.Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio. 2018. Tiriyó: Non-contrastive exophoric uses of demonstratives. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 222–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meira, Sérgio & Raquel Guirardello-Damian. 2018. Brazilian Portuguese: Non-contrastive exophoric use of demonstratives in the spoken language. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 116–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukhin, Timofey. 2023. Demonstratives. In Daniel, Michael, Konstantin Filatov, Timur Maisak, George Moroz, Timofey Mukhin, Chiara Naccarato & Samira Verhees (eds.), Typological Atlas of the languages of Daghestan (TALD), v. 1.1.0. Moscow: Linguistic Convergence Laboratory, HSE University. Available at [URL] (last access 28 March 2023). DOI logo
Schulze, Wolfgang. 2003. The diachrony of demonstrative pronouns in East Caucasian. In Dee Ann Holisky & Kevin Tuite (eds.), Current trends in Caucasian, East European and Inner Asian linguistics, 291–348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terrill, Angela. 2018. Lavukaleve: Exophoric usage of demonstratives. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 206–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Hadley, Mara Averick, Jennifer Bryan, Winston Chang, Lucy D’Agostino McGowan, Romain François, Garrett Grolemund, Alex Hayes, Lionel Henry, Jim Hester, Max Kuhn, Thomas Lin Pedersen, Evan Miller, Stephan Milton Bache, Kirill Müller, Jeroen Ooms, David Robinson, Dana Paige Seidel, Vitalie Spinu, Kohske Takahashi, Davis Vaughan, Claus Wilke, Kara Woo & Hiroaki Yutani. 2019. Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David P. 1999. The 1999 demonstrative questionnaire: ‘This’ and ‘that’ in comparative perspective. In Wilkins, David. P. (ed.), Manual for the 1999 field season, 1–24. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
2018. The demonstrative questionnaire: “THIS” and “THAT” in comparative perspective. In Stephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition), 43–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar