On the link between grammaticalization and subjectification
The case of the Dutch modals
This article argues that the widespread view that the diachronic processes of grammaticalization and of
subjectification go hand in hand, and that highly subjectivized meanings typically correlate with highly grammaticalized forms,
should be revised. The point is made on the basis of the case of the diachrony of the Dutch modal verbs. Corpus data show that
four of these verbs recently got involved in a process of collective re-autonomization, while the two other modals in the language
do not. This correlates with differences in the semantic development of the verbs: the four re-autonomizing verbs do, but the two
outliers do not show a regular process of (inter)subjectification. The paper unravels through which mechanisms the grammatical and
the semantic developments may correlate, hence why highly subjectivized meanings do not necessarily like a grammatical status.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
- 3.The grammatical developments
- 4.The semantic developments
- 5.An explanation
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (58)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s
semantic map. Linguistic
Typology 21. 79–124.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2014. (Inter)subjectification
in a functional theory of grammaticalization. Acta Linguistica
Hafniensia 461. 7–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L. & William Pagliuca. 1987. The
evolution of future meaning. In: Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrop Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds.), Papers
from the 7th international conference on historical
linguistics, 109–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1991. Back
to the future. In: Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches
to
grammaticalization, vol. 21, 17–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Byloo, Pieter & Jan Nuyts. 2014. Meaning
change in the Dutch core modals. Acta Linguistica
Hafniensia 461. 85–116. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caers, Wim & Sune Gregersen. 2019. Wat
mutt, dat mutt: ‘Independent’ modals in West Germanic vernaculars. Nederlandse
Taalkunde 241. 399–417. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
CD-ROM
Middelnederlands. 1998. Den Haag: SDU.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corpus gesproken
Nederlands. 2004. Version
2.0. Leiden: TST-Centrale INL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duinhoven, A. M. 1997. Middelnederlandse
syntaxis synchroon en diachroon, vol. 21: De werkwoordgroep. Groningen: Nijhoff.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grondelaers, Stefan, Katrien Deygers, Hilde Van Aken, Vicky Van Den Heede & Dirk Speelman. 2000. Het
ConDiv-corpus geschreven Nederlands. Nederlandse
Taalkunde 51. 356–363.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, Kees & Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional
discourse grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Janssens, Karolien. 2015. The
diachrony of the mental state predicates in
Dutch. Antwerp: University of Antwerp PhD dissertation.
Janssens, Karolien & Jan Nuyts. 2014. ‘Nu
thenke, wannan thaz geschehan si’: Een diachrone analyse van denken. Nederlandse
Taalkunde 191. 311–348. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive
Linguistics 11. 5–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald. 1999. Grammar
and conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald. 2006. Subjectification,
grammaticization, and conceptual archetypes. In: Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), Subjectification, 17–40. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
López-Couso, María José. 2010. Subjectification and
intersubjectification. In: Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical
pragmatics, 127–163. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej. 2011. Interaction
of verbal
categories. Linguistics 491. 229–282. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan. 2005. The
modal confusion: On terminology and the concepts behind it. In: Alex Klinge & Henrik Müller (eds.), Modality, 5–38. London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan. 2006. Modality. In: William Frawley (ed.), The
expression of
modality, 1–26. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan. 2007. Kunnen
diachroon. Taal &
Tongval 591. 118–148.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan. 2013. De-auxiliarization
without de-modalization in the Dutch core modals. Language
Sciences 361. 124–133. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan. 2014. Zelfstandig
gebruikte modalen. Nederlandse
Taalkunde 191. 351–373, 415–418. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan. 2016. Analyses
of the modal meanings. In: Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of modality and
mood, 31–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan. 2021. Qualifying
conceptualizations. In: Xu Wen & John Taylor (eds.), The
Routledge handbook of cognitive
linguistics, 421–432. New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan & Wim Caers. 2021. Directionals
and re-autonomization in the Dutch modals. Language Dynamics and
Change 111. 241–272. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan & Karolien Janssens. 2019. Parentheticals
revisited. Folia Linguistica
Historica 401. 475–508. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan & Wietske Vonk. 1999. Epistemic
modality and focus in
Dutch. Linguistics 371. 699–737. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan, Pieter Byloo & Janneke Diepeveen. 2010. On
deontic modality, directivity, and mood: The case of Dutch mogen and moeten. Journal of
Pragmatics 421. 16–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan, Wim Caers & Henri-Joseph Goelen. 2021. System
and variation in the Dutch modals. In: Gitte Kristiansen, Karlien Franco, Stefano De Pascale, Laura Rosseel & Weiwei Zhang (eds.), Cognitive
sociolinguistics
revisited, 242–250. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan, Wim Caers & Henri-Joseph Goelen. 2022. The
Dutch modals, a paradigm? In: Gabriele Diewald & Katja Politt (eds.), Paradigms
regained, 245–265. Berlin: Language Science Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan, Henri-Joseph Goelen & Wim Caers. 2018. Hoeven
diachroon. Taal &
Tongval 701. 17–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oudnederlands
woordenboek. 2012. Online edition: [URL] (last
access 23 November
2023).
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and
modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pijnenburg, W. J. J., K. H. van Dalen-Oskam, K. A. C. Depuydt & T. H. Schoonheim (eds.). 2000. Vroegmiddelnederlands
woordenboek. Leiden: INL. Online
edition: [URL] (last access 23 November 2023).
Plank, Frans. 1981. Modalitätsausdruck
zwischen Autonomie und Auxiliarität. In: Inger Rosengren (ed.), Sprache
und
Pragmatik, 57–71. Lund: CWK Gleerup.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Squartini, Mario. 2016. Interactions
between modality and other semantic categories. In: Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of modality and
mood, 50–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steele, Susan. 1975. On
some factors that affect and effect word order. In: Charles N. Li (ed.), Word
order and word order
change, 197–268. Austin: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Toorn, Maarten C. van den, Wilhelmus Pijnenburg, Jan van Leuvensteijn & Joop van der Horst (eds.). 1997. Geschiedenis
van de Nederlandse taal. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1989. On
the rise of epistemic meanings in
English. Language 651. 31–55. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1995. Subjectification
in grammaticalization. In: Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity
and
subjectification, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth. 2006. Historical
aspects of modality. In: William Frawley (ed.), The
expression of
modality, 107–139. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity
and (inter)subjectification. In: Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification,
intersubjectification and
grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth & Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity
in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valin, Robert Van & Randy LaPolla. 1997. Syntax:
Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verwijs, E. & J. Verdam. 1885–1929. Middelnederlandsch
woordenboek. Den Haag: Nijhoff. Online edition: [URL] (last
access 23 November
2023).
Vries, Jan de. 1971. Nederlands etymologisch
woordenboek. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vries, M. De & J. A. Te Winkel. 1864–1998. Woordenboek
der Nederlandsche taal. Den Haag/Leiden: Nijhoff/Sijthoff. Online
edition: [URL] (last access 23 November 2023).
Wijk, N. van. 1912. Franck’s etymologisch woordenboek der
Nederlandsche taal. Second edition. Den Haag: Nijhoff. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.