Evidentiality as a grammaticalization passenger
An investigation of evidential developments in Tibetic languages and beyond
This article investigates the grammaticalization patterns of evidentiality from a cross-linguistic perspective
with a focus on Lhasa Tibetan. It documents the history of the evidential morphemes ’dug, -song, -bzhag, and
=ze from Old Literary Tibetan to modern spoken Lhasa Tibetan. Our analyses show that these morphemes started
grammaticalizing before encoding evidentiality. We argue that, through pragmatic strengthening, evidentiality tends to infiltrate
forms which have already grammaticalized to express other semantic domains. These patterns of grammaticalization are confirmed by
diachronic and reconstructed data from genetically unrelated languages. Evidentiality thus tends to be a ‘grammaticalization
passenger’ (i.e., a conventionalized meaning which used to be merely implied from the recurrent contexts of a grammaticalized
form) rather than a ‘grammaticalization target’ (i.e., a functional domain which triggers grammaticalization). This may explain
why evidentiality is less often grammaticalized than other notions, such as time or modality, in the world’s languages.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Evidentiality and its grammaticalization
- 2.1Grammaticalization and its function
- 2.2The grammaticalization of evidentiality in the world’s languages
- 3.Methodology and corpus
- 3.1Languages under study
- 3.2Corpora and sources
- 4.Grammaticalization patterns of main evidential categories
- 4.1An overview of the Central Tibetan evidential system
- 4.2Direct perception
- 4.2.1
Lhasa Tibetan ’dug
- 4.2.2
Lhasa Tibetan song
- 4.2.3In other languages
- 4.3Inference
- 4.3.1
Lhasa Tibetan -bzhag
- 4.3.2In other languages
- 4.4Hearsay
- 4.4.1
Lhasa Tibetan =ze
- 4.4.2In other languages
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References and sigla
References (120)
References and sigla
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2011. The grammaticalization of
evidentiality. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
grammaticalization, 605–613. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (ed.). 2018a. The Oxford
handbook of evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2018b. Evidentiality: The
framework. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of
evidentiality, 1–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
AnderBois, Scott. 2014. On
the exceptional status of reportative evidentials. On the exceptional status of reportative
evidentials. Semantics and Linguistic Theory
(SALT) 241. 234–254. Ithaca, New York: LSA and CLC Publications.
Ansaldo, Umberto, Walter Bisang & Pui Yiu Szeto. 2018. Grammaticalization
in isolating languages and the notion of complexity. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), Grammaticalization
from a typological
perspective, 219–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aronson, Howard I. 1982. Georgian: A reading
grammar. Columbus: Slavica.
Bakker, Peter. 2006. Algonquian
verb structure: Plains Cree. In Grażyna J. Rowicka & Eithine B. Carlin (eds.), What’s
in a verb? Studies in the verbal morphology of the languages of the
America, 3–27. Utrecht: LOT, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Bartee, Ellen Lynn. 2007. A grammar of Dongwang
Tibetan. Santa Barbara: University of California at Santa Barbara PhD dissertation.
Bialek, Joanna. 2018. The
Proto-Tibetan clusters sL- and sR- and the periodisation of Old Tibetan. Himalayan
Linguistics 17(2). 1–50.
Bialek, Joanna. 2021. Naming
the empire: From Bod to Tibet. A philologico-historical study on the origin of the
polity. Revue d’Études
Tibétaines 611. 339–402.
Bialek, Joanna. 2022. A
textbook in Classical
Tibetan. London: Routledge.
Bialek, Joanna. 2023. “
bcan
pos who were not khri: Royal titulature and the succession to the throne in the Tibetan
Empire.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African
Studies 86 (1): 121–146.
Bielmeier, Roland, Katrin Häsler, Chungda Haller, Felix Haller, Veronika Hein, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Thomas Preiswerk, Ngawang Tsering, Manuel Widmer, & Marius Zemp. 2018.
Comparative
dictionary of Tibetan dialects
(CDTD). Volume 21: Verbs. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bielmeier, Roland. 2004. Shafer’s
proto-West Bodish hypothesis and the formation of the Tibetan verb
paradigms. In Anju Saxena (ed.), Himalayan
languages, past and
present, 395–412. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bisang, Walter, Andrej Malchukov, Iris Rieder, Linlin Sun, Marvin Martiny & Svenja Luell. 2020. Position
paper: Universal and areal patterns in grammaticalization. In Walter Bisang & Andrej Malchukov (eds.) Grammaticalization
scenarios from Europe and
Asia. Volume 11, 1–88. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Blass, Regina. 1989. Grammaticalisation
of interpretive use: The case of re in
Sissala. Lingua 79(4). 299–326.
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2012. A
usage-based theory of grammatical status and
grammaticalization. Language 88(1).1–44.
Brosig, Benjamin & Elena Skribnik. 2018. Evidentiality
in Mongolic. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of
evidentiality, 554–579. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan & William Pagliuca. 1987. The
evolution of future meaning. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds.), Papers
from the 7th international conference on historical
linguistics, 109–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Cognitive
processes in grammaticalization. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The
new psychology of language, 151–174. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chang, Kun & Betty Chang. 1984. The
certainty hierarchy among Spoken Tibetan verbs of being. Bulletin of the Institute of History
and Philology, Academia
Sinica 55(4). 603–635.
COCA: Corpus of Contemporary American
English. Mark Davis. (2008–). Available
at: [URL] (last access 14 December 2023).
Coronel-Molina, Serafín M. 2011. Marcadores de evidencialidad en
hablantes bilingües de Quechua- Castellano. In Willem F. H. Adelaar, Pilar Valenzuela Bismarck & Roberto Zariquiey Biondi (eds.), Estudios
sobre lenguas andinas y amazónicas. Homenaje a Rodolfo
Cerrón-Palomino, 391–411. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Fondo Editorial.
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2019. Taking
diachronic evidence seriously: Result-oriented vs. source-oriented explanations of typological
universals. In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne M. Michaelis & Ilja Seržant (eds.). Explanation
in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the
evidence, 25–46. Berlin: Language Science Press. Available at [URL] (last
access 14 December
2023).
Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai. 2013. Perfective/Imperfective
Aspect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS
Online (v2020.3) [Data
set]. Zenodo. (Available online at [URL], last
access 19 May 2023.)
Davoine, Justine. 2010. Paraît
qu’ c’est joli la vie d’Juliette. Hallennes-Lez-Haubourdin
Dba’ = Dba’ bzhed,
apud Pasang Wangdu & Hildegard Diemberger. 2000.
de Jong, Jan Willem. 1959. Mi la ras paʼi rnam thar: texte
tibétain de la vie de
Milarépa. Hague: Mouton.
DeLancey, Scott. 1985. Lhasa
Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting
of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 65–72.
Dendale, Patrick, & Liliane Tasmowski. 2001. Introduction
Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of
Pragmatics 33(3). 339–348.
Dendale, Patrick. 1993. Le
conditionnel de l’information incertaine: Marqueur modal ou marqueur
évidentiel? In Gerold Hitty (ed.), Actes
du 20e Congrès international de linguistique et philologie
romanes, Volume 11, 165–176. Halle: Francke.
Denwood, Philip. 2007. The
language history of Tibetan. In Roland Bielmeier & Felix Haller (eds.), Linguistics
of the Himalayas and
beyond, 47–70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Doney, Lewis (ed.). 2020. Bringing
Buddhism to Tibet. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Eberhard, David M. 2018. Evidentiality in Nambikwara
languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of
evidentiality, 333–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ebihara, Shiho. 2017. Evidentiality
of the Tibetan verb snang
. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.). Evidential
systems of Tibetan
languages, 41–59. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Èdel’man, Džoy J. I. 1975. Kategorii vremeni i
vida. In Vera S. Rastorgueva (ed.), Opyt
istoriko-tipologičeskogo issledovanija iranskix
jazykov, Volume 21, 337–411. Moscow: Nauka.
Èdel’man, Džoy J. I. 2000. Šungano- rušanskaja
gruppa. In Vera S. Rastorugueva (ed.), Iranskie
jazyki III: Vostočnoiranskie iranskie
jaziky, 208–224. Moscow: Indrik.
Emkow, Carola. 2012. Araona. In Mily Crevels & Pieter Muysken (eds.), Lenguas
de
Bolivia. Tomo 21: Amazonía, 155–189. La Paz: Plural Editores.
Esteban, Avelino Corral. 2015. Layers and operators in
Lakota. Kansas Working Papers in
Linguistics 361. 1–33.
Friedman, Victor A. 2018. Where do evidentials come
from? In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of
evidentiality, 124–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallica = [URL] (last access 14
December 2023).
Garrett, Edward John. 2001. Evidentiality and assertion
in Tibetan. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles PhD dissertation.
Gildea, Spike & Jóhanna Barðdal. 2022. From
grammaticalization to Diachronic Construction Grammar: A natural evolution of the
paradigm. Studies in
Language 47(4), 743–788.
GLR = Bsod-nams Rgyal-mtshan. 1750–1760
[1368]. Rgyal rabs gsal ba’i me long. Edited
by Bla-ma chen-po Kun-dga’ ’Phrin-las Rgya-mtsho. Sde-dge.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2000. The
relevance of extravagance: A reply to Bart
Geurts. Linguistics 381. 789–798.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2019. Can
cross-linguistic regularities be explained by constraints on
change? In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne M. Michaelis & Ilja Seržant (eds.), Explanation
in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the
evidence, 1–23. Berlin: Language Science Press. [URL] (last access 14 December 2023).
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The
handbook of historical
linguistics, 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hill, Nathan W. 2013.
ḥdug as a
testimonial marker in Classical and Old Tibetan. Himalayan
Linguistics 12(1). 1–16.
Hill, Nathan W. 2017. Perfect experiential
constructions: The inferential semantics of direct evidence. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential
systems of Tibetan
languages, 131–159. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional
change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and
syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and
grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal. In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What
makes grammaticalization – A look from its fringes and its
components, 21–42. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hongladarom, Krisadawan. 1994. Historical
development of the Tibetan evidential tuu
. In Hajime Kitamura, Tatsuo Nishida & Yasuhiko Nagano (eds.), Current
Issues in Sino-Tibetan
Linguistics, 673–684. Osaka: The Organizing Committee, The 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
Hongladarom, Krisadawan. 2007. Grammatical
peculiarities of two dialects of southern Kham Tibetan. In Roland Bielmeier & Felix Haller (eds.), Linguistics
of the Himalayas and
beyond, 119–152. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd
edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IDP = International Dunhuang Project. [URL]
Izvorski, Roumyana. 1997. The
present perfect as an epistemic modal. In Aaron Lawson (ed.), Proceedings
from semantics and linguistic
theory VII1, 222–239. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.
Kany, Charles E. 1944. Impersonal dizque and its
variants in American Spanish. Hispanic
Review 12(2). 168–177.
Kitamura, Hajime. 1977. Tibetan:
Lhasa Dialect. Tokyo: Asia Africa Gengo Bunka Kenkyūjo, Tokyo Gaikokugo Daigaku.
Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging
modals. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1975
[1965]. The evolution of grammatical categories. Esquisses
linguistiques 21. 38–54.
Kuteva, Tania. 1995. The
Auxiliation Constraint and Reference. In Richard Geiger (ed.), Reference
in multidisciplinary perspective: Philosophical object, cognitive subject, intersubjective
process, 374–386. Hildesheim: Olms.
Kuteva, Tania. 2004. Auxiliation:
An enquiry into the nature of
grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee (eds.). 2019. World
lexicon of grammaticalization. 2nd
edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Labov, William. 2001. Principles
of linguistic change. Social
factors. Malden: Blackwell.
Labov, William. 2007. Transmission
and
diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–387.
LaPolla, Randy J. 2003. Dulong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The
Sino-Tibetan
languages, 674–682. London: Routledge.
Lehmann, Christian. 1995
[1982]. Thoughts on
grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Lehmann, Christian. 1989. Grammatikalisierung
und lexikalisierung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und
Kommunikationsforschung 42(1). 11–19.
Lewis, Geoffrey L. 1985 [1967]. Turkish
grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loughnane, Robyn. 2009. A
grammar of Oksapmin. Melbourne: University of Melbourne PhD dissertation.
Maisak, Timur & Solmaz Merdanova. 2002. Kategorija
evidencial’nosti v agul’skom
jazyke, Kavkazovedenie 11. 102–112.
Mélac, Éric. 2014. L’évidentialité
en anglais: Approche contrastive à partir d’un corpus
anglais-tibétain. Paris: Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3 PhD dissertation.
Mélac, Éric. 2018. Pour
une taxonomie du changement linguistique: Comment redéfinir la
grammaticalisation. In Sylvie Hancil (ed.), Fonctionnements
linguistiques et
grammaticalisation, 29–57. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.
Mélac, Éric. 2021. Evidentiality
and its grammaticalization in French: A contrastive study based on a spoken French-Tibetan
corpus. Presented at Societas Linguistica
Europaea (30 August – 3 September
2021).
Mélac, Éric. 2022. The
grammaticalization of evidentiality in English. English Language &
Linguistics 26(2). 331–359.
Mélac, Éric. 2023. The
pragmatic differences between grammatical and lexical evidentiality: A corpus-based study of Tibetan and
English. Journal of
Pragmatics 2101. 143–156.
Mélac, Eric, Nicolas Tournadre & Alexandra Aikhenvald. Forthcoming. Speaking
of oneself in multi-term evidential systems: From the Himalayas to Amazonia.
ML = Mi-la Ras-pa’s Rnam thar, apud de
Jong 1959.
Norde, Muriel. 2012. Lehmann’s
parameters revisited. In Bert Cornillie & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Grammaticalization
and language change: New
reflections, 73–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Oisel, Guillaume. 2013. Morphosyntaxe
et sémantique des auxiliaires et des connecteurs du tibétain littéraire: étude diachronique et
synchronique. Paris: Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3 PhD dissertation.
Oisel, Guillaume. 2017a. On
the origin of the Lhasa Tibetan evidentials song and
byung
. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential
systems of Tibetan
languages, 161–183. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Oisel, Guillaume. 2017b. Re-evaluation
of the evidential system of Lhasa Tibetan and its atypical functions. Himalayan
linguistics 16(2). 90–128.
OTDO = Old Tibetan Documents Online: [URL] (last
access 15 December
2023).
Seiler, Walter. 1985. Imonda,
a Papuan language. Canberra: The Australian National University.
Slobin, Dan I. 1997. The origins of grammaticizable
notions: Beyond the individual mind. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The
cross-linguistic study of language
acquisition, Volume 51: Expanding the
contexts, 265–324. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Squartini, Mario. 2018. Extragrammatical
expression of information source. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of
evidentiality, 273–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Suzuki, Hiroyuki. Forthcoming. Functional
transition from ‘hear’ to nonvisual sensory and hearsay evidential categories: A case study of rGyalthang
Tibetan.
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward
a cognitive semantics, Volume 11: Concept structuring
systems. Harvard, MA: MIT Press.
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2001. From
resultatives to evidentials: multiple uses of the perfect in Nakh-Dagestanian
languages, Journal of
Pragmatics 33(3). 443–464.
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2007. Évidencial’nost’
i admirativ v bagvalinskom jazyke. in Viktor S. Chrakovskij (ed.), Évidencial’nost’
v jazykax Evropy i
Azii, 351–397. Moscow: Nauka.
Telles, Stella & W. Leo Wetzels. 2006. Evidentiality
and epistemic mood in Lakondê. In Grazyna J. Rowicka & Eithne B. Carlin (eds.), What’s
in a verb? Studies in the verbal morphology of the languages of the
Americas, 235–252. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT Publications.
Thornell, Christina. 1997. The Sango language and its lexicon (Sêndâ-yângâ tî
sängö). Lund: Lund University.
Tournadre, Nicolas & Sangda Dorje. 2003. Manual
of Standard Tibetan: Language and civilization. (1st
ed. in 1996. Manuel de tibétain standard. L’Asiathèque). Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion.
Tournadre, Nicolas & Hiroyuki Suzuki. 2023. The
Tibetic languages: An introduction to the family of languages derived from Old
Tibetan. Villejuif: LACITO.
Tournadre, Nicolas. 1994. Personne
et médiatifs en tibétain. Faits de
langues 2(3). 149–158.
Tournadre, Nicolas. 1996a. Comparaison
des systèmes médiatifs en tibétain central, ladakhi, dzongkha et
amdo. In Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.). 1996. L’Énonciation
médiatisée, 195–213. Paris: Peeters.
Tournadre, Nicolas. 1996b. L’ergativité
en tibétain: Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue
parlée. Paris: Peeters.
Tribur, Zoe. 2017. Observations
on factors affecting the distributional properties of evidential markers in Amdo
Tibetan. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.). Evidential
systems of Tibetan
languages, 367–421. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Van Driem, George. 1998. Dzongkha. Leiden: Leiden University Research School CNWS.
Vokurková, Zuzana. 2008. Epistemic
modalities in spoken Standard
Tibetan. Paris: Filozofická Fakulta Univerzity Karlovy – Université Paris 8 PhD dissertation.
Vokurková, Zuzana. 2017. Epistemic
modality in spoken standard Tibetian: epistemic verbal endings and
copulas. Prague: Charles University, Karolinum Press.
Vykypěl, Bohumil. 2010. Das
Problem der sprachlichen
elementarverwandtschaft. Munich: Lincom.
Wangdu, Pasang & Hildegard Diemberger. 2000. dBa’
bzhed: the royal narrative concerning the bringing of the Buddha’s doctrine to
Tibet. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Wiemer, Björn & Juana I. Marin-Arrese (eds.). 2022. Evidential
marking in European languages: Toward a unitary comparative
account. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
Wylie, Turrell. 1959. A
standard system of Tibetan transcription. Harvard Journal of Asiatic
Studies 221. 261–267.
Zeisler, Bettina. 2017b. The
emergence of the Ladakhi inferential and experiential markers from a marker for admirativity (non-commitment): The case of
ḥdug and snaŋ
. Journal of South Asian Languages and
Linguistics 4(2). 259–307.
Zemp, Marius. 2018. A
grammar of Purik
Tibetan. Leiden: Brill.
Ziegeler, Debra. 1997. Retention
in ontogenetic and diachronic grammaticalization. Cognitive
Linguistics 81. 207–241.
Zipf, George Kingsley. 1949. Human behavior and the principle
of least-effort: An introduction to human
ecology. Cambridge: Addison Wesley.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Mélac, Eric & Pascale Leclercq
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.