Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 48:2 (2024) ► pp.436471
References
Baayen, R. Harald
2009Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, 900–919. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
2019Compounds and multi-word expressions in English. In Barbara Schlücker (ed.), Complex lexical units: Compounds and multi-word expressions, 45–68. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Berghoff, Robyn, Rick Nouwen, Lisa Bylinina & Yaron McNabb
2020Degree modification across categories in Afrikaans. Linguistic Variation 20(1). 102–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2009Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy, 75–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia
2017Death-related intensifiers in the history of the English language: Grammaticalisation and other processes of language change. Santiago de Compostela: University of Santiago de Compostela PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1972Degree words. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonacchi, Silvia
2017What does reduplication intensify? The semantics and pragmatics of reduplicated forms in Italian and their equivalents in German. In Maria Napoli & Miriam Ravetto (eds.), Exploring intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives, 289–303. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
2019Compounds and multi-word expressions in Dutch. In Barbara Schlücker (ed.), Complex lexical units: Compounds and multi-word expressions, 95–126. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert & Matthias Hüning
2014Affixoids and constructional idioms. In Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar, 77–105. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bordet, Lucille
2017From vogue words to lexicalized intensifying words: The renewal and recycling of intensifiers in English. A case-study of very, really, so and totally. Lexis 10. Available at: DOI logo (last access 24 November 2022).Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav, Abi Hawtin & Tony McEnery
2021The written British national corpus 2014 – design and comparability. Text & Talk 41(5/6). 595–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans
2016Projection of adjective phrases II: Modification. Taalportaal. Available at: [URL] (last access 16 October 2023).
Calpestrati, Nicolò
2017Intensification strategies in German and Italian written language: The case of prefissi intensive or Fremdpräfixe. A corpus-based study. In Maria Napoli & Miriam Ravetto (eds.), Exploring intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives, 305–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claudi, Ulrike
2006Intensifiers of adjectives in German. Language Typology and Universals 59(4). 350–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cosentino, Gianluca
2017Stress and tones as intensifying operators in German. In Maria Napoli & Miriam Ravetto (eds.), Exploring intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives, 193–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Jim O’Driscoll & Claire Hardaker
2019Notions of politeness in Britain and North America. In Eva Ogiermann & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (eds.), From speech acts to lay understandings of politeness: Multilingual and multicultural perspectives, 177–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra
Dekeukelaere, Melanie
2016Afrikaanse intensiveerders: Een corpusgebaseerd onderzoek over het verschil in gebruik zowel in formele en informele taal als in ouder en recenter taalgebruik [Afrikaans intensifiers: A corpus-based study of the difference in use both in formal and informal language and in older and more recent language usage]. Ghent: Ghent University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache
2023DWDS-Kernkorpus 21 (2000–2010). Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Available at: [URL] (last access 16 October 2023).
Dixon, R. M. W.
2014Making new words: Morphological derivation in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce C.
1991The influence of English on Afrikaans. Pretoria: Academica.Google Scholar
Dutch Language Union
2004Corpus spoken Dutch: Release 1.0. The Hague: Dutch Language Union.Google Scholar
Esterhuizen, H. L.
1974Intensivering in Afrikaans [Intensification in Afrikaans]. Bloemfontein: University of the Orange Free State MA thesis.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Robert
Gutzmann, Daniel & Katharina Turgay
2012Expressive intensifiers in German: Syntax-semantics mismatches. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 91. 146–166.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Susanne M. Michaelis
2017Analytic and synthetic: Typological change in varieties of European languages. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Beat Siebenhaar (eds.), Language variation – European perspectives IV 1, 3–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendrikx, Isa, Kirstel Van Goethem, Fanny Meunier & Philippe Hiligsmann
2017Language-specific tendencies towards morphological or syntactic constructions: A corpus study on adjective intensification in L1 Dutch, L1 French and L2 Dutch. Nederlandse Taalkunde 22(3). 389–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilte, Lisa, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Walter Daelemans
2018Expressive markers in online teenage talk: A correlational analysis. Nederlandse Taalkunde 23(3). 293–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack
2012Elative compounds in Dutch: Properties and developments. In Guido Oebel (ed.), Crosslinguistic comparison of intensified adjectives and adverbs, 97–142. Hamburg: Kovač.Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik & Achim Zeileis
2006Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3). 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, Rika & Sali Tagliamonte
2003Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32(2). 257–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubícek, Miloš, Adam Kilgarriff, Vojtech Kovár, Pavel Rychlý & Vit Suchomel
2013The TenTen corpus family. Proceedings of the International Corpus Linguistics Conference 71. 125–127.Google Scholar
Klein, Henny
1998Adverbs of degree in Dutch and related languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
2017The comparative basis of intensification. In Maria Napoli & Miriam Ravetto (eds.), Exploring intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives, 15–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leuschner, Torsten & Nancy Decroos
2007Woordvorming tussen systeem en norm: Affixoïden in het Duits en in het Nederlands [Word formation between system and norm: Affixoids in German and Dutch]. Phrasis 21. 89–120.Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia
2014Geographic variation of quite + ADJ in twenty national varieties of English: A pilot study. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 21. 109–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Love, Robbie, Claire Dembry, Andrew Hardie, Vaclav Brezina & Tony McEnery
2017The spoken BNC2014: De-signing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3). 319–344.Google Scholar
Malloggi, Patrizio
2017Intensifying structures of adjectives across German and Italian. In Maria Napoli & Miriam Ravetto (eds.), Exploring intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives, 251–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Nayal, Belén
2021Synthetic intensification devices in Old English. Journal of English Linguistics 49(2). 208–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neels, Jakob, Stefan Hartmann & Tobias Ungerer
2023A quantum of salience: Reconsidering the role of extravagance in grammaticalization. In Hendrik De Smet, Peter Petré & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds.), Context, intent and variation in grammaticalization, 47–78. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noordegraaf, Jan
2008Progress in language and progress in communication: The case of Afrikaans. In Achim Eschbach, Mark A. Halawa & Jens Loenhoff (eds.), Audiatur et altera pars: Kommunikationswissenschaft zwischen Historiographie, Theorie und empirischer Forschung; Festschrift für H. Walter Schmitz [Audiatur et altera pars: Communication science between historiography, theory and empirical research: Festschrfit for H. Walter Schmitz], 209–223. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel, Sarah Sippach & Benjamin Houitte
2022Happy as a frog in a lily pond: Phrasal similes as semi-schematic idioms. Paper presented at Societas Linguistica Europaea 551, University of Bucharest, 24–27 August.Google Scholar
Oostdijk, Nelleke, Martin Reynaert, Véronique Hoste & Ineke Schuurman
2013The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch. In Peter Spyns & Jan Odijs (eds.), Essential speech and language technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN programme, 219–247. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2001Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Lingusitics 12(1). 47–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, Hans
1994Degree adverbs in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 269–288. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2022R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: [URL] (last access 16 October 2023).
Rhee, Seongha
2016On the emergence of the stance-marking function of English adverbs: A case of intensifiers. Linguistic Research 33(3). 395–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richter, Michael & Roeland van Hout
2020Ranking Dutch intensifiers: A usage-based approach. Language and Cognitions 12(2). 343–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlücker, Barbara
2019Compounds and multi-word expressions in German. In Barbara Schlücker (ed.), Complex lexical units: Compounds and multi-word expressions, 69–94. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Thomas
2014The Research and Teaching Corpus of Spoken German – FOLK. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation 91. 383–387.Google Scholar
Schröder, Daniela
2023The genre specifics of English wh-exclamatives. Functions of Language 30(2). 159–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter
2017English exclamative clauses and interrogative degree modification. In Maria Napoli & Miriam Ravetto (eds.), Exploring intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives, 207–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stratton, James M.
2020Adjective intensifiers in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 32(2). 183–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taalkommissie
2010Taalkommissiekorpus. Pretoria: Suid-Afrikaanse Akademie vir Wetenskap en Kuns.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali
2008So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Canadian English. English Language & Linguistics 12(2). 361–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016So sick or so cool? The language of youth on the internet. Language in Society 45(1). 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trollip, Benito
2021The meaning of affixoids in Afrikaans. Paper presented at Workshop on Afrikaans Linguistics, University of Zürich, 4–5 October.
Van der Wouden, Ton & Ad Foolen
2017A most serious and extraordinary problem: Intensification of adjectives in Dutch, German and English. Leuvense Bijdragen 1011. 82–101.Google Scholar
Van Goethem, Kristel
2014Reuze bedankt, het was echt top! Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar ‘loskoppeling’ van samenstellingscomponenten [Thank you very much, it was really super! A comparative study of debonding of compound components]. Internationale Neerlandistiek 52(1). 27–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Haeringen, Coenraad B.
1956Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels [Dutch between German and English]. The Hague: Servire.Google Scholar
Van Os, Charles
1989Aspekte der Intensivierung im Deutschen [Aspects of intensification in German]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Van Sluijs, Robbert
2013Afrikaans. In Susanne M. Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.), The survey of pidgin and creole languages, volume 1: English-based and Dutch-based languages, 285–296. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: [URL] (last access 16 October 2023).
Virtuele Instituut vir Afrikaans
2022Korpusportaal [Corpus portal]. VivA Afrikaans. Available at: [URL] (last access 16 October 2023).
Xiao, Richard & Hongyin Tao
2007A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of amplifiers in British English. Sociolinguistic Studies 1(2). 241–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar