Article published In:
Studies in Language: Online-First ArticlesManaging expectations
Referential expectedness and uncertainty in a syntactically flexible language
One of the central goals of human language is to convey intended messages successfully to the addressee. However,
communication inherently involves uncertainty or unexpectedness which hinders this delivery. Different languages have different
strategies to manage unexpectedness. In this article, we explore the strategies used in Murrinhpatha, an Australian Aboriginal
language with highly flexible syntax, that is, free constituent order and frequent NP omission. We argue that Murrinhpatha
speakers utilise the language’s syntactic flexibility to manage referential expectations. Highly unexpected referents tend to be
expressed preverbally, while expected referents which need to be ‘reinforced’ are usually expressed postverbally. Uniquely
expected referents are usually syntactically omitted. We argue that expectation and uncertainty provide a more convincing account
of Murrinhpatha compared to an account of accessibility. Our findings shed new light on several aspects of syntactically flexible
languages, including pragmatic salience and newsworthiness, and the functional distinction between postverbal NPs and NP
omission.
Keywords: referential uncertainty, free constituent order, NP omission, Australian Aboriginal languages
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Constituent order and NP omission in syntactically flexible languages
- 3.The role of addressees’ expectations and uncertainty in pronoun use
- 4.Preverbal NPs and unexpected referents
- 5.When referents match addressees’ expectations
- 5.1NP omission and uniquely expected referents
- 5.2Postverbal NPs and reinforcement of expected referents
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- List of abbreviations
-
References
Published online: 4 October 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23031.ma
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23031.ma
References (71)
Adamou, Evangelia, Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds.). 2018. Information
structure in lesser-described languages: Studies in prosody and
syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Arnold, Jennifer E. 2010. How speakers refer: The role of
accessibility. Language and Linguistics
Compass 4(4). 187–203.
Arnold, Jennifer E., Janet G. Eisenband, Sarah Brown-Schmidt & John C. Trueswell. 2000. The
rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from
eyetracking. Cognition 76(1). B13–B26.
Arnold, Jennifer E. & Zenzi M. Griffin. 2007. The
effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. Journal of
Memory and
Language 56(4). 521–536.
Austin, Peter. 2001. Word
order in a free word order language: The case of Jiwarli. In Jane Simpson, David Nash, Mary Laughren, Peter Austin & Barry Alpher (eds.), Forty
years on: Ken Hale and Australian
languages, 305–323. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
Austin, Peter & Joan Bresnan. 1996. Non-configurationality
in Australian aboriginal languages. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 14(2). 215–268.
Baker, Brett & Ilana Mushin. 2008. Discourse
and grammar in Australian languages. In Ilana Mushin & Brett Baker (eds.), Discourse
and grammar in Australian
languages, 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Beeching, Kate & Ulrich Detges (eds.). 2014. Discourse
functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language
change. Leiden: Brill.
Blythe, Joe. 2009. Doing
referring in Murriny Patha
conversation. Sydney: University of Sydney Ph.D. dissertation.
Bock, June Kathryn & Richard K. Warren. 1985. Conceptual
accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence
formulation. Cognition 21(1). 47–67.
Bowern, Claire. 2008. Bardi
arguments: Referentiality, agreement and omission in Bardi
discourse. In Ilana Mushin & Brett Baker (eds.), Discourse
and grammar in Australian
languages, 59–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse,
consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and
writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clark, Herbert H. & Gregory L. Murphy. 1982. Audience
design in meaning and reference. In Jean-François Le Ny & Walter Kintsch (eds.), Advances
in
psychology, 287–299. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North
Queensland. London: Cambridge University Press.
Downing, Pamela & Michael Noonan (eds.). 1995. Word
order in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Evans, Nicholas. 1985. Kayardild:
The language of the Bentinck Islanders of North West
Queensland. Canberra: The Australian National University Ph.D. dissertation.
. 2003. Bininj
Gun-wok: A pan-dialectical grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku and
Kune. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.
Ferreira, Victor S. 2019. A mechanistic framework for
explaining audience design in language production. Annual Review of
Psychology 70(1). 29–51.
Fletcher, Janet & Andrew Butcher. 2014. Sound
patterns of Australian languages. In Harold Koch & Rachel Nordlinger (eds.), The
languages and linguistics of
Australia, 91–138. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Frank, Michael C. & Noah D. Goodman. 2012. Predicting
pragmatic reasoning in language
games. Science 336(6084). 998.
Franke, Michael & Gerhard Jäger. 2016. Probabilistic
pragmatics, or why Bayes’ rule is probably important for pragmatics. Zeitschrift Für
Sprachwissenschaft 35(1). 3–44.
Fukumura, Kumiko & Roger P. G. van Gompel. 2010. Choosing
anaphoric expressions: Do people take into account likelihood of reference? Journal of Memory
and
Language 62(1). 52–66.
Givón, Talmy. 1983a. Topic
continuity and word-order pragmatics in Ute. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic
continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language
study, 141–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1983b. Topic
continuity in discourse. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic
continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language
study, 5–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(ed.). 1983c. Topic
continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language
study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2011. Ute
reference grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gleitman, Lila R., David January, Rebecca Nappa & John C. Trueswell. 2007. On
the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. Journal of Memory and
Language 57(4). 544–569.
Gordon, Bryan. 2016. Information-structural
variations in Siouan languages. In Catherine Rudin & Bryan Gordon (eds.), Advances
in the study of Siouan languages and
linguistics, 393–423. Berlin: Languages Science Press.
Grice, Herbert P. 1975. Logic and
conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech
Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Gundel, Jeanette, Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive
status and the form of referring expressions in
discourse. Language 69(2). 274–307.
Gürer, Aslı & Aslı Göksel. 2019. (Prosodic-)
structural constraints on gapping in Turkish. In Ayse S. Özsoy (ed.), Word
order in
Turkish, 219–259. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Hale, Ken. 1983. Warlpiri
and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 1(1). 5–47.
. 1992. Basic
word order in two “free word order” languages. In Doris L. Payne (ed.), Pragmatics
of word order
flexibility, 63–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
İşsever, Selçuk. 2019. On
the ban on postverbal wh phrases in Turkish: A syntactic
Account. In Ayse S. Özsoy (ed.), Word
order in
Turkish, 67–90. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Karmiloff-smith, Annette. 1985. Language
and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective. Language and Cognitive
Processes 1(1). 61–85.
Kehler, Andrew & Hannah Rohde. 2013. A
probabilistic reconciliation of coherence-driven and centering-driven theories of pronoun
interpretation. Theoretical
Linguistics 39(1–2). 1–37.
. 2019. Prominence
and coherence in a Bayesian theory of pronoun interpretation. Journal of
Pragmatics 1541. 63–78.
Kiss, Katalin É. 1981. Structural relations in
Hungarian, a “free” word order language. Linguistic
Inquiry 12(2). 185–213.
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of
generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
López, Luis. 2014. Dislocations
and information structure. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of information
structure, 402–421. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ma, Chun Long. 2024. Referential choice and free
constituent order in Murrinhpatha
narratives Melbourne: The University of Melbourne Ph.D. dissertation.
Meyer, Karen S. 1992. Word order in
Klamath. In Doris L. Payne (ed.), Pragmatics
of word order
flexibility, 167–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mithun, Marianne. 1992. Is
basic word order universal? In Doris L. Payne (ed.), Pragmatics
of word order
flexibility, 15–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1996. Grammar
sketches: The Mohawk language. In Jacques Maurais (ed.), Quebec’s
aboriginal languages: History, planning, and
development, 159–173. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
. 2006. The
Iroquoian languages. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia
of language & linguistics. 2nd
edn, 31–34. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Mushin, Ilana. 2005. Word
order pragmatics and narrative functions in Garrwa. Australian Journal of
Linguistics 25(2). 253–273.
Mushin, Ilana & Brett Baker (eds.). 2008. Discourse
and grammar in Australian languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nieuwland, Mante S. & Jos J. A. Van Berkum. 2008. The
neurocognition of referential ambiguity in language comprehension. Language and Linguistics
Compass 2(4). 603–630.
Nordlinger, Rachel. 2011. Transitivity
in Murrinh-Patha. Studies in
Language 35(3). 702–734.
Nordlinger, Rachel & Evan Kidd. 2023. Uncovering
ergative use in Murrinhpatha: Evidence from experimental data. Australian Journal of
Linguistics 43(1). 69–86.
Nordlinger, Rachel, Gabriela Garrido Rodriguez & Evan Kidd. 2022. Sentence
planning and production in Murrinhpatha, an Australian “free word order”
language. Language 98(2). 187–220.
Payne, Doris L. 1987. Information structuring in
Papago narrative
discourse. Language 63(4). 783–804.
(ed.). 1992. Pragmatics
of word order flexibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Poletto, Cecilia & Giuliano Bocci. 2016. Syntactic
and prosodic effects of information structure in Romance. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of information
structure, 642–662. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rohde, Hannah & Andrew Kehler. 2014. Grammatical
and information-structural influences on pronoun production. Language, Cognition and
Neuroscience 29(8). 912–927.
Rude, Noel. 1992. Word
order and topicality in Nez Perce. In Doris L. Payne (ed.), Pragmatics
of word order
flexibility, 193–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Simard, Candide. 2010. The
prosodic contours of Jaminjung, a language of Northern
Australia. Manchester: The University of Manchester Ph.D. dissertation.
. 2018. On
being first. In Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds.), Information
structure in lesser-described languages: Studies in prosody and
syntax, 85–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Simpson, Jane. 2007. Expressing
pragmatic constraints on word order in Warlpiri. In Annie E. Zaenen (ed.), Architectures,
rules, and preferences: Variations on themes by Joan W.
Bresnan, 403–427. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Simpson, Jane & Ilana Mushin. 2008. Clause-initial
position in four Australian languages. In Ilana Mushin & Brett Baker (eds.), Discourse
and grammar in Australian
languages, 25–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stevenson, Rosemary J., Rosalind A. Crawley & David Kleinman. 1994. Thematic
roles, focus and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive
Processes 9(4). 519–548.
Swartz, Stephen. 1991. Constraints
on zero anaphora and word order in Warlpiri narrative
text. Darwin: Australian Aborigines and Islanders Branch, Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Tachihara, Karina & Adele E. Goldberg. 2020. Cognitive
accessibility predicts word order of couples’ names in English and Japanese. Cognitive
Linguistics 31(2). 231–249.
Tily, Harry & Steven Piantadosi. 2009. Refer
efficiently: Use less informative expressions for more predictable meanings. Proceedings of the
Workshop on the Production of Referring Expressions: Bridging the Gap between Computational and Empirical Approaches to
Reference, 8 pps.