Article published In:
Studies in Language: Online-First Articles

Anticausativization in Gyalrongic languages

| Nankai University School of Literature | Sichuan University, College of Foreign Languages
This article presents a comprehensive survey of anticausativization within Gyalrongic languages, a group of Sino-Tibetan languages spoken in Sichuan, China, contributing significantly to our understanding of this phenomenon’s theoretical and diachronic underpinnings. The research affirms that anticausative alternation is predominantly associated with verbs that exhibit a change of state semantics. This categorization includes decausative and autocausative verbs, further subdivided in Gyalrongic languages into specific semantic groups such as Separation, Removal, Physical Transformation, etc. Certain verbs with agent-oriented meanings also undergo anticausative alternation, calling for a revision of previous claims. Gyalrongic languages demonstrate a unique trend in their use of anticausative marking, deviating from global patterns by avoiding the polyfunctional employment of these markers. The article traces the origins of anticausative marking to a spontaneous / non-volitional action prefix and identifies the emergence of a new non-volitional prefix that has overtones of anticausative marking, descending from an orientational / TAME prefix.
Keywords: anticausativization, Gyalrongic languages, direction of derivation, agent-oriented meaning, change-of-state semantics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Valency changes
    • 1.2What is anticausativization?
    • 1.3Anticausatives compared to passives and reflexives
    • 1.4Gyalrongic languages
  • 2.Gyalrongic anticausativization in typological context
    • 2.1Formal typology
    • 2.2Semantic typology
  • 3.East Gyalrongic
    • 3.1Kyomkyo Situ
    • 3.2Bragbar Situ
    • 3.3Cogtse Situ
    • 3.4Bhola Situ
    • 3.5Japhug
    • 3.6Zbu
    • 3.7Tshobdun
  • 4.West Gyalrongic
    • 4.1Khroskyabs
    • 4.2Geshiza
    • 4.3Stau
    • 4.4Bragmda' rTa'u
    • 4.5Bawang
    • 4.6Stosde
    • 4.7Tangut
  • 5.Diachrony
    • 5.1Direction of derivation and voicing
    • 5.2Diachronic typology
  • 6.Orientational / TAME prefixes marking non-volitionality
  • 7.Contributions to anticausativization typology
    • 7.1Contributions to anticausative semantics
    • 7.2Diachronic contributions
  • 8.Conclusion and future research directions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 15 October 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23063.gat
References (53)
References
Bahrt, Nicklas N. 2021. Voice syncretism. Number 1 in Research on Comparative Grammar. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela. 2012. Aspectual constraints on the (anti)causative alternation in Old Italian. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3). 394–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique. Tome 11: Catégories et constructions. Paris: Hermes Science Publications.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory. Vol. 11: Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2000. Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gates, Jesse. 2012. Situ in situ: Towards a dialectology of Jiāróng (rGyalrong). MA thesis. Langley: Trinity Western University.
Gates, Jesse P. 2021. A grammar of Mazur Stau. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales PhD dissertation.
forthcoming. ‘Melt’ and the labial causative in Gyalrongic languages. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. TBA.
Gates, Jesse P. & Honkasalo, Sami & Lai, Yunfan. 2022. From transitive to intransitive and voiceless to voiced in Proto-Sino-Tibetan: New evidence from Stau, Geshiza, and Khroskyabs. Language and Linguistics 23(2). 212–239.Google Scholar
Geniusiené, Emma. 1987. The typology of reflexives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerner, Matthias. 2007. The lexicalization of causative verbs in the Yi group. Folia Linguistica Historica 28(1–2). 145–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gong, Xun. 2018. Le rgyalrong zbu, une langue tibéto-birmane de Chine du Sud-ouest : une étude descriptive, typologique et comparative. Paris: Institut national des langues et civilisations orientales PhD dissertation.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1987. Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type. Arbeitspapier 51 (Neue Folge). 51pp.Google Scholar
. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. Causatives and Transitivity 231. 87–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Universals of causative and anticausative verb formation and the spontaneity scale. Lingua Posnaniensis 58(2). 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Calude, Andreea & Spagnol, Michael & Narrog, Heiko & Bamyaci, Elif. 2014. Coding causal-noncausal verb alternations: A form-frequency correspondence explanation1. Journal of Linguistics 50(3). 587–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honkasalo, Sami. 2019. A grammar of Eastern Geshiza: A culturally anchored description. Helsinki: University of Helsinki PhD dissertation.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, & Beth Levin. 2024. Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron, and Ivy Sichel (eds), Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. 21–38. Oxford 2010 online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 May 2010), DOI logo, accessed 3 Aug. 2024.Google Scholar
Huáng, Liángróng & Sūn, Hóngkāi. 2002. Hàn jiāróng cídiǎn 漢嘉戎詞典 [Chinese- Rgyalrong dictionary]. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Inglese, Guglielmo. 2020. The Hittite middle voice: Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Cross-linguistic sources of anticausative markers. Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads 2(2). 127–186. Available at: [URL] (last access 27 May 2024).
Jacobsen, Wesley M. 1985. Morphosyntactic transitivity and semantic markedness. Chicago Linguistics Society 21(2). 89–104.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2012. An Internal Reconstruction of Tibetan Stem Alternations. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(2). 212–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The spontaneous-autobenefactive prefix in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area 38(2). 271–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. A note on volitional and non-volitional prefixes in gyalrong languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 40(2). 124–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. The labial causative in Trans-Himalayan. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 12(1). 1–11.Google Scholar
. 2021. A grammar of Japhug. Number 1 in Comprehensive Grammar Library. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Antonov, Anton & Lai, Yunfan & Nima, Lobsang. 2017. Stau (Ergong, Horpa). In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages. 2nd edn. 597–613. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & d’Alpoim Guedes, Jade. 2023. Sichuan peppercorn and the birth of numbing spices in east Asia. Ethnobiology Letters 14(1). 10–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Michaud, Alexis. 2011. Approaching the historical phonology of three highly eroded Sino-Tibetan languages: Naxi, Na and Laze. Diachronica 28(4). 468–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27(1). 77–138. Available at: [URL] (last access 27 May 2024). DOI logo
Kulikov, Leonid. 2010. Voice typology. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), Linguistic Typology, The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology. 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2016. Causativisation in Wobzi and other Khroskyabs dialects. Cahiers de Linguistique — Asie Orientale 45(2). 148–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi. Paris: Université Paris III PhD dissertation.
Mei, Tsulin. 2012. The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 1–28.Google Scholar
Nagano, Yasuhiko. 2018. Gyarongo bunpō kenkyū [a reference grammar of the rGyalrong language — Bhola dialect]. Tokyo: Kyuuko Syoin.Google Scholar
Nagano, Yasuhiko & Prins, Marielle (eds.). 2013. rGyalrongic Languages Database. Tokyo: National Museum of Ethnology. Available at: [URL] (last access 27 May 2024).
Nedyalkov, Vladimir P. & Silnitsky, Georgij G. 1973. The typology of morphological and lexical causatives. Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna & Peterson, David A. & Barne, Jonathan. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2). 149–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas Edward. 1997. Describing morphosyntax. A guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prins, Marielle. 2016. A grammar of rGyalrong Jiaomuzu (Kyom-kyo) dialects, A web of relations. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagart, Laurent & Baxter, William H. 2012. Reconstructing the s- prefix in Old Chinese. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 29–59.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian. 2009. The causative alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(2). 641–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shefts-Chang, Betty. 1971. The Tibetan causative: Phonology. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 42(4). 623–765.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2007. Morphological causative formation in Shangzhai Horpa. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 1(2). 207–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Sino-Tibetan: Rgyalrong. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 630–650. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T-S. & Blogros, Bstan’dzin. 2019. Tshobdun Rgyalrong spoken texts with a grammatical introduction. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Tunzhi. 2019. Outline of Bra’go variety of rTa’u (Horpa). Melbourne: La Trobe University PhD dissertation.
Yang, Chih-Fan. 2021. 巴旺霍爾語時、體、示證、情態範疇的形態句法 [The morphosyntax of tense, aspect, evidentiality and modality in Bawang Horpa]. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University PhD dissertation.
Zhang, Shuya. 2018. Stem alternations in the Brag-bar dialect of Situ rGyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41(2). 294–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Le rgyalrong situ de Brag-bar et sa contribution à la typologie de l’expression des relations spatiales : l’orientation et le mouvement associé. PhD dissertation. Paris: Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales. Available at: [URL] (last access 27 May 2024).
Zúñiga, Fernando & Kittilä, Seppo. 2019. Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar