Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 24:2 (2000) ► pp.462469
References (9)
References
Bybee, Joan L. 1995. “Regular morphology and the lexicon”. Language and Cognitive Processes 101. 425–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. “The emergent lexicon”. Chicago Linguistic Society 341.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan; William Pagliuca; and Revere Perkins. 1994. The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Green, John N. 1987. “The evolution of Romance auxiliaries: criteria and chronology”. In Harris, Martin and Paolo Ramat (eds), Historical development of auxiliaries, 257–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. “Emergent grammar”. Berkeley Linguistics Society 131. 139–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quesada, J. Diego. 1995. “ Estar + -ndo y el aspecto progresivo en español”. Iberoromania 421. 8–29.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 1998. Verbal periphrases in Romance: aspect, actionality, and grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar