Review published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 24:2 (2000) ► pp. 470477
References
Chafe, Wallace
1976 “Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view.” In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, 25–55.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
1998 “Syntactic inquiries into discourse restrictions on multiple interrogatives”. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 421, 1–60.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette
1974The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. Doctoral dissertation. University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1998Language form and language function. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1981 “Toward a taxonomy of given/new information.” In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 223–254.Google Scholar
1986 “On the syntactic marking of presupposed open propositions.” Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory. Chicago Linguistic Society 221, 208–222.Google Scholar
1992 “The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status.” In Sandra Thompson & William Mann (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse analyses of a fundraising text. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 295–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rando, Emily N. & Donna Jo Napoli
1978 “Definites in there-sentences.” Language 541, 300–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Safir, Kenneth
1985Syntactic chains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strand, Kjetil
1996A taxonomy of linking relations. Paper presented at the IndiAna Workshop on Indirect Anaphora. Lancaster University, England.