Members of the MPI for Psycholinguistics are researching the interrelationship between language, cognition and the
conceptualization of space in various languages. Research results show that there are three frames of spatial reference, the
absolute, the relative, and the intrinsic frame of reference. This study first presents results of this research in general and then
discusses the results for Kilivila. Speakers of this Austronesian language prefer the intrinsic frame of reference for the location
of objects with respect to each other in a given spatial configuration. But they prefer an absolute frame of reference system in
referring to the spatial orientation of objects in a given spatial configuration. Moreover, the hypothesis is confirmed that
languages seem to influence the choice and the kind of conceptual parameters their speakers use to solve non-verbal problems
within the domain of space.
Lum, Jonathon, Bill Palmer, Jonathan Schlossberg & Alice Gaby
2022. Diversity in representing space within and between language communities. Linguistics Vanguard 8:s1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Tenbrink, Thora
2022. Linguistic spatial reference systems across domains: How people talk about space in sailing, dancing, and other specialist areas. Linguistics Vanguard 8:s1 ► pp. 151 ff.
Lum, Jonathon
2021. The intrinsic frame of reference and the Dhivehi ‘FIBO’ system. Cognitive Linguistics 32:4 ► pp. 703 ff.
Mishra, Ramesh C. & Rajesh K. Jha
2018. Effect of Hindi, Sanskrit and Urdu medium schooling on spatial language and encoding. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 2:1-2 ► pp. 9 ff.
Nikitina, Tatiana
2018. Frames of reference in discourse: Spatial descriptions in Bashkir (Turkic)
. Cognitive Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 495 ff.
Abarbanell, Linda, Rachel Montana & Peggy Li
2011. Revisiting the Plasticity of Human Spatial Cognition. In Spatial Information Theory [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6899], ► pp. 245 ff.
Hanks, William F.
2009. Fieldwork on deixis. Journal of Pragmatics 41:1 ► pp. 10 ff.
Hanks, William F.
2005. Explorations in the Deictic Field. Current Anthropology 46:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Majid, Asifa, Melissa Bowerman, Sotaro Kita, Daniel B.M. Haun & Stephen C. Levinson
2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:3 ► pp. 108 ff.
Levinson, Stephen C.
2003. Space in Language and Cognition,
Mishra, Ramesh C., Pierre R. Dasen & Shanta Niraula
2003. Ecology, language, and performance on spatial cognitive tasks. International Journal of Psychology 38:6 ► pp. 366 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.